U.S.
Military Proposal to Arm Rebels Includes No-Fly Zone in Syria
A
U.S. military proposal for arming Syrian rebels also calls for a
limited no-fly zone inside Syria that would be enforced from
Jordanian territory to protect Syrian refugees and rebels who would
train there, according to U.S. officials
WSJ,
13
June, 2013
Asked
by the White House to develop options for Syria, military planners
have said that creating an area to train and equip rebel forces would
require keeping Syrian aircraft well away from the Jordanian border.
To
do that, the military envisages creating a no-fly zone stretching up
to 25 miles into Syria which would be enforced using aircraft flown
from Jordanian bases and flying inside the kingdom, according to U.S.
officials.
The
White House is currently considering proposals to arm the rebels in
Jordan, according to U.S. officials. White House National Security
Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden declined to comment on the details
of those deliberations.
The
limited no-fly zone wouldn't require the destruction of Syrian
antiaircraft batteries, U.S. officials said.
Officials
said the White House could decide to authorize the U.S. to arm and
train rebels in Jordan without authorizing the no-fly zone
recommended by military planners. A White House announcement could
come soon, officials said.
Jordan
has been inundated by a flood of refugees that Jordanian and U.S.
officials say is a growing threat to the kingdom, a key U.S. ally in
the region. The U.S. has already moved Patriot air defense batteries
and F-16 fighter planes to Jordan, which could be integral to any
no-fly zone if President Barack Obama approves the military proposal.
Proponents
of the proposal say a no-fly zone could be imposed without a U.N.
Security Council resolution, since the U.S. would not regularly enter
Syrian airspace and wouldn't hold Syrian territory.
U.S.
planes have air-to-air missiles that could destroy Syrian planes from
long ranges. But officials said that aircraft may be required to
enter Syrian air space if threatened by advancing Syrian planes. Such
an incursion by the U.S., if it were to happen, could be justified as
self-defense, officials say.
Military
planners believe it would be dangerous to set up a major operation
inside Jordan to arm the rebels without creating a no-fly zone to
hold Syrian aircraft back.
"Unless
you have a good buffer zone inside Syria, you risk too much,"
said a U.S. official briefed on the military proposal.
Creating
even a limited buffer zone that Syrian airplanes cannot enter will be
expensive, costing an estimated $50 million a day. Still, officials
say that a full no-fly zone covering all of Syria would cost far more
money. Officials said the U.S. hopes the operation would be conducted
with other allies, who could help pay for the cost of a no-fly zone.
The
U.S. planes involved in the no-fly zone would fly from Jordan and
possibly from Navy ships in the Mediterranean or Red Sea. Jordan has
offered the U.S. and its allies the use of its military bases to
protect a safe zone inside the kingdom, according to U.S. officials.
Jordanian officials in Washington had no immediate comment.
U.S.
military officials believe it will take about a month to get such a
limited no fly zone up and running, officials say. Officials say
there may be a limited window to do so. If Russia decides to provide
advanced, long-range S-300 air defense weapons to Syria, it would
make such a limited no-fly zone far more risky for U.S. pilots.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.