This week Bill McKibben of 350.org is touring New Zealand and was interviewed by Kim Hill on Radio New Zealand on Saturday.
Don't
get me wrong. Bill McKibben has been one of the main voices for
bringing climate change to the attention of the public.
However, I
have some reservations about 350.org that I wrote about in THIS
ARTICLE.
Nothing
makes me any more comfortable about the message being brought by
McKibben from hearing this interview. If anything, it confirms my
suspicions.
Basically
he is saying the same as what he has been saying since I first heard
him, which is basically the situation is pretty dire and unless we do
something about our emissions then we will have some pretty bad
consequences.
Everything
is still in the future.
When
is the recognition going to come that inaction has led to a situation
where so many greenhouse gasses have been released that global
warming has probably become irreversable (if we collapse the world
industrial economy NOW, not just stop burning fossil fuels) and have
released some self-reinforcing, non-linear feedbacks.
Essentially
we are at the start of runaway global warming.
No
time for solar energy, petitioning a reasonable (sic) government to
make changes.
I
never heard Mr. McKibben make reference to any of these feedbacks.
The
feeling that I am left with is that Mr McKibben relies for funding of
his 350.org on some very rich sponsors who would not be very
interested in his communicating the true state of affairs.
Then
there is a certain degree of understandable denial in most of us –
who wants to allow the idea of near-term extinction?
But
when it comes from someone with the influence of Bill McKibben it
becomes dangerous.
Bill
McKibben: doing the maths
PS
Last
week I sent a letter
to Radio New Zealand about their science programme on climate
change.
I
received a very nice response from Veronika Meduna, the producer in
which she more or less says that Radio New Zealand is is only
interested in a parochial coverage of global warming
– something that, if I read correctly between the lines, she is not
comfortable with.
Many
thanks for your email – and my apologies if the profile of
Generation Zero was offensive to you.
I
completely agree with you that events in the Arctic demonstrate most
forcefully what is happening with the world’s climate system.
However, our brief for the programme is to have a New Zealand
connection, so we usually look towards Antarctica and the Southern
Ocean, simply because that’s where polar scientists who are based
here tend to do their research.
Having
said that, we will increase our coverage of climate change science in
the lead-up to
the release of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change’s 5th
assessment report in October (the release starts with the Working
Group 1 report on the science of climate change, followed by the two
reports on mitigation and adaptation next year). Within that coverage
you will also find a number of international scientists and climate
change campaigners – for example, Bill McKibben will talk to Kim
Hill tomorrow morning and will also be on our show the following
week. I’d personally like to have Jim Hansen on the show, too.
Apart from our coverage on air, we’ve also been using our website
(www.radionz.co.nz/ourchangingworld)
and social media to alert our listeners and followers to other
coverage, including some of the links you’ve provided below.
Given
New Zealand’s particular profile of greenhouse gas emissions, some
of our on-air coverage will remain ‘parochial’, but leading up to
the IPPC report, we’ll be picking up some more global topics as
well. I hope you’ll tune in again and let us know what you think.
Many
thanks again for your feedback,
Best
wishes
Veronika
(Meduna)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.