White
House warned on imminent Arctic ice death spiral
National
security officials worried by rapid loss of Arctic summer sea ice
overlook threat of permanent global food shortages
2
May, 2013
Senior
US government officials are to be briefed
at the White House this week
on the danger of an ice-free Arctic
in the summer within two years.
The
meeting is bringing together Nasa's acting chief scientist, Gale
Allen, the director of the US National Science Foundation, Cora
Marett, as well as representatives from the US Department of Homeland
Security and the Pentagon.
This
is the latest indication that US officials are increasingly concerned
about the international and domestic security implications of climate
change.
Senior
scientists advising the US government at the meeting include 10
Arctic specialists, including marine scientist Prof Carlos Duarte,
director of the Oceans Institute at the University of Western
Australia.
In
early April, Duarte warned that the Arctic summer sea ice was melting
at a rate faster than predicted by conventional climate models, and
could be ice free as
early as 2015
- rather than toward the end of the century, as the UN
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projected in 2007.
He said:
"The
Arctic situation is snowballing: dangerous changes in the Arctic
derived from accumulated anthropogenic green house gases lead to more
activities conducive to further greenhouse gas emissions. This
situation has the momentum of a runaway train."
Duarte
is lead author of a paper
published last year in Nature Climate Change documenting how "tipping
elements" in the Arctic ecosystems leading to "abrupt
changes" that would dramatically impact "the global earth
system" had "already started up". Duarte and his team
concluded: "We are facing the first clear evidence of dangerous
climate change.
New
NASA satellite imagery from March 2013 reveals massive cracks in ice
connecting Beaufort Gyre region to Alaska
New
research suggests that the Arctic summer sea ice loss is linked to
extreme weather. Rutgers University climate scientist Jennifer
Francis points to the phenomenon of
"Arctic amplification", where:
"The
loss of Arctic summer sea ice and the rapid warming of the Far North
are altering the jet stream over North America, Europe, and Russia.
Scientists are now just beginning to understand how these profound
shifts may be increasing the likelihood of more persistent and
extreme weather."
Extreme
weather events over the last few years apparently driven
by the accelerating Arctic melt process
- including unprecedented heatwaves and droughts in the US and
Russia, along with snowstorms and cold weather in northern Europe –
have undermined
harvests,
dramatically impacting global food production and contributing to
civil
unrest.
US
national security officials have taken an increasing interest in the
destabilising impact of climate
change.
In February this year, the US Department of Defense (DoD) released
its new Climate
Change Adaptation Roadmap,
which noted that global warming will have:
"...
significant geopolitical impacts around the world, contributing to
greater competition for more limited and critical life-sustaining
resources like food and water."
The
effects of climate change may:
"Act
as accelerants of instability or conflict in parts of the world...
[and] may also lead to increased demands for defense support to civil
authorities for humanitarian assistance or disaster response, both
within the United States and overseas … DoD will need to adjust to
the impacts of climate change on its facilities, infrastructure,
training and testing activities, and military capabilities."
The
primary goal of adaptation is to ensure that the US armed forces are
"better prepared to effectively respond to climate change"
as it happens, and "to ensure continued mission success" in
military operations - rather than to prevent or mitigate climate
change.
While
the DoD is also concerned about the Arctic, the focus is less on
risks than on opportunities:
"The
Department is developing cooperative partnerships with interagency
and international Arctic stakeholders to collaboratively address
future opportunities and potential challenges inherent in the
projected opening of the Arctic."
Arctic
"stakeholders" include US,
Russian, Canadian, Norwegian and Danish energy firms,
which are scrambling to exploit the northern polar region's untapped
natural wealth. The region is estimated to hold a quarter of the
world's remaining undiscovered oil and gas reserves, sparking
concerted efforts by these countries to expand
their Arctic military presence.
The
US
Homeland Security Department's Climate Change Roadmap
released last year raised similar issues, warning that climate change
"could directly affect the Nation's critical infrastructure",
as well as aggravating "conditions that could enable terrorist
activity, violence, and mass migration".
On
the Arctic, the report highlights the imperative to protect US
resource interests by increasing regional military penetration:
"Melting
sea ice in the Arctic may lead to new opportunities for shipping,
tourism, and resource exploration, but the increase in human activity
may require a significant increase in operational capabilities in the
region in order to safeguard lawful trade and travel and to prevent
exploitation of new routes for smuggling and trafficking."
A
public
statement
in response to news of the White House's Arctic briefing released on
Tuesday by the UK-based Arctic
Methane Emergency Group
(AMEG) - a group of international climate scientists – called on
governments to recognise that the dramatic loss of summer sea ice in
the Arctic would amplify the types of extreme weather events that
have already affected the world's major food basket regions,
undermining global food production for the foreseeable future with
serious consequences for international security.
The
group, which includes among its founding members leading Arctic
specialists such as Prof Peter Wadhams, head of the Polar Ocean
Physics Group at Cambridge University, stated that:
"The
weather extremes from last year are causing real problems for
farmers, not only in the UK, but in the US and many grain-producing
countries. World food production can be expected to decline, with
mass starvation inevitable. The price of food will rise inexorably,
producing global unrest and making food security even more of an
issue."
The
AMEG statement adds that governments should consider geoengineering
techniques - large-scale technological interventions in the climate
system - to "cool the Arctic and save the sea ice" in order
to avert catastrophe. Critics point out, however, that untested
geoengineering technologies could have damaging unintended impacts on
ecosystems,
and that a regulatory framework is needed before embarking on major
projects.
Dr
Nafeez Ahmed
is director of the Institute
for Policy Research & Development
and author of A
User's Guide to the Crisis of Civilisation: And How to Save It
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.