Challenging
Monsanto: 200,000 in 40 countries to rally against GMO
Activists
around the world are gearing up for a weekend of rallies to protest
Monsanto, the biotechnology giant accused of genetically engineering
agriculture and food while turning a blind eye to their potentially
deadly health ramifications
RT,
24
May, 2013
Organized
by the 'March Against Monsanto' movement, an estimated 200,000
activists will participate in the massive campaign spanning six
continents, 40 nations, and at least 48 US states.
Angered
by the lack of action from governments on the issue, activists in
hundreds of cities – including New York, Chicago, Montreal,
Berlin, Paris, Brussels, Moscow and Melbourne – will stage
coordinated protests against Monsanto and demand a ban on Genetically
Engineered and Genetically Modified Organisms (GE/GMOs).
Initially
a small, grassroots event, the march became a globe-spanning movement
through the efforts of local activists and environmentalists. The
protest is being organized on Facebook and Google Documents, where
users can find a list of events near their location.
Activists
of the global environmental watchdog Greenpeace demonstrate against
US biotech giant Monsanto and the commercial sowing of transgenic
corn, at "Parque de los Venados" in Mexico City (AFP Photo)
March
Against Monsanto Director Nick Bernabe told the Natural Society
that genetically engineered food could affect everyone, even the
apathetic: “What we’re trying to do is bring awareness to GMOs
and the health effects that they’re causing and bring about some
solutions about what people can do to take back their food supply,”
he said. “They’re expecting more than 15,000 people in
San Francisco alone… We want to get people working together in
their communities.”
Monsanto
has described current research into GMO crops as "inconclusive,"
and has lobbied hard in Washington and around the globe to continue
manufacturing lab-made foods without the oversight demanded by
activists.
In
March, Congress passed a biotech rider dubbed the 'Monsanto
Protection Act' that effectively allows Monsanto and other companies
that use GMOs to plant and sell genetically altered products even if
legal action is taken against them.
Up
until it was signed, “the USDA [US Department of
Agriculture] oversaw and approved (or denied) the testing of
genetically modified seeds, while the federal courts retained the
authority to halt the testing or sale of these plants if it felt that
public health was being jeopardized. With HR 933 now a law, however,
the court system no longer has the right to step in and protect the
consumer,” explained James
Brumley, a reporter for Investor Place.
“They
own the largest share of the agribusiness, pesticides and seeds,”
Joanne Montana, who organized a protest in Florida, told the
Gainesville Sun. “They’re transnational, in food behind
the scenes and a big conglomerate.”
Protesters
against Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) are chained to a vehicle
as they block a delivery entrance to a Monsanto seed distribution
facility in Oxnard, California (Reuters / Mario Anzuoni)
The
'Monsanto Protection Act' was co-authored by a senator who
has received thousands of dollars
in campaign contributions from the company — a revelation that did
not surprise many, given that another important figure in Washington,
Justice Clarence Thomas, served as an attorney for the corporation
before he was nominated to the Supreme Court, only to eventually
preside over a case involving his former employer.
But
according to Food & Water Watch, the relationship between
Monsanto and the government extends beyond Congress and the Supreme
Court. In a statement accompanying a health report, Food & Water
Watch wrote that communications uncovered by WikiLeaks detailed how
“the US State Department lobbies foreign governments to
adopt pro-agricultural biotechnology policies and laws, operates a
rigorous public relations campaign to improve the image of
biotechnology and challenges commonsense biotechnology safeguards and
rules – including opposing genetically engineered (GE) food
labeling laws.”
With
the protest approaching, organizers have accused Monsanto of going on
the offensive and wrote on the event’s Facebook page that the mass
rallies had not been cancelled, debunking a false rumor they accused
Monsanto sympathizers of spreading.
“Events
are disappearing, posts are being put on city event pages that say
events are being cancelled,”
said Tom Canal, an administrator for the March Against Monsanto
Facebook page, according to the Organic Prepper blog. “In
no way, shape or form, has any event been cancelled. I believe
Monsanto is behind this. Some of the people on the page that are
commenting have newly made profiles and seemingly those profiles were
made strictly to cause problems and get a rise out of our
participants on the page.”
Jane
Michalek (R) drinks soup during an eat-in protest in front of the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition in College Park, Maryland (Reuters / Gary Cameron)
In
an interview with Bloomberg earlier this month, Monsanto CEO Hugh
Grant portrayed those who do not agree with his business tactics as
snobs: “There is this strange kind of reverse elitism: If
I’m going to do this, then everything else shouldn’t exist,”
he said. “In the US, we’ve got a system that works.”
In
their ongoing struggle to reach a wider audience through the
mainstream media, anti-GMO activists have outlined a number of
solutions and goals for which they are advocating, including the
"labeling of GE/GMOs so that consumers can make those
informed decisions easier,"
"further scientific research on the health effects of
GE/GMOs," and, perhaps most
importantly, "taking to the streets to show the world
and Monsanto that we won't take these injustices quietly."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.