By
Paul Antonopoulos
25
September, 2018
In
August 2017, Donald Trump said he did not exclude the military option
to solve the Venezuelan crisis, which provoked a strong rejection
both inside and outside the United States. However, the idea remains
present even though many express themselves against it, writes the
Business Insider newspaper.
The
military option for resolving the crisis in Venezuela is on the table
or at least in the head of the US president. So
the AP news agency reported earlier this summer that President Donald
Trump had discussed the military invasion of Venezuela during a White
House meeting last year. To bolster his arguments, Trump recalled the
military interventions of Grenada and Panama, which he said were a
success.
Other
voices in the United States have also been in favor of using military
force. In particular, as the Business Insider underscores, in late
August this year, Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio, an advisor
on Latin American affairs and close to Trump, said Venezuela has
become a destabilizing force in the region.
“I
believe that the armed forces of the United States are only used in
the case of a threat to national security,” Rubio said, adding that
he believed there was a “very strong” argument that “Venezuela
and the Maduro regime have become a threat to the region and to the
United States.”
There
are also other opinions. Even if the Venezuelan crisis justifies
pushing for political change, military intervention is not the way to
do it, said Shannon O’Neil, senior researcher for Latin American
affairs at the Council on Foreign Relations.
“But
US military intervention is not the way to do it,” O’Neil argued
this month. “Venezuela isn’t Grenada or Panama, the two Latin
American countries invaded by the US during the closing days of the
Cold War.”
According
to O’Neil, a military invasion of Venezuela would be similar on a
scale to that of Iraq, a country twice smaller than Venezuela, with a
slightly larger population. Not taking into account that, according
to the polls, American troops would not be welcomed with open arms in
the Latin American country.
“Any
invasion requires preparations on a similar scale, meaning a
100,000-plus force,” the analyst was quoted as saying.
For
James Stavridis, a retired naval admiral, rather than resorting to
military force unilaterally in Venezuela, Washington should boost
interagency interaction and encourage more involvement of other
countries in resolving the situation.
“The
US should definitely not act alone,” adds James Bosworth, founder
of Hxagon.
Although
resistance to the use of force in Venezuela remains strong, US
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo promised on Friday that Washington
will increase pressure on Caracas.
“You’ll
see in the coming days a series of actions that continue to increase
the pressure level against the Venezuelan leadership folks, who are
working directly against the best interest of the Venezuelan people,”
Pompeo said. “We’re determined to ensure that the Venezuelan
people get their say.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.