Dare
I think Russia might have warded off this false flag attack?
Russia
Squelches Trump’s New Plan to Invade Syria
Eric
Zuesse
1
September, 2018
On
Friday, August 31st, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced
that Russia has handed
to the OPCW (Organization
for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons), and to the U.N., “proof”
that the U.S. Government has been working
with Al Qaeda to
set up a chemical incident in Syria. The U.S. and its allies will
then use that incident as a supposed justification for invading Syria
as a ‘humanitarian’ response to a chemical attack allegedly by
Syria’s Government, but actually done by U.S.-backed forces. The
goal is to re-ignite the 7-year-old ‘civil war’ between Syria’s
Government and U.S.-backed ‘rebels’, who consist almost
exclusively of fundamentalist-Sunni jihadists that are trained and
led by Al Qaeda in Syria, with U.S. help and Saudi financing.
On
August 29th Global Research headlined “Video:
US Creates Strike Force to Attack Syria”,
and posted an August 28th report from South Front saying:
Reports are appearing that the Syrian Air Defense Forces (SADF) have already started preparing to repel an expected US-led missile strike by deploying additional specialists and air defense systems near the crucial objects of the infrastructure, which they expect may be targeted.
On August 22, US National Security Advisor John Bolton claimed that “if the Syrian regime uses chemical weapons, we will respond very strongly and they really ought to think about this a long time.”
This was only one of a series of threats to the Syrian government issued by the US, the UK and France. While all these threats are clearly exploiting the chemical weapons narrative, their main goal is to prevent the defeat of the terrorists in Idlib by delaying the Syrian Army operation.
On August 25, a source close to the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) told the Kurdish news outlet Bas News that the US-led coalition began deploying radar stations at its bases in the governorates of al-Hasakah and Aleppo as part of a new plan to increase its control of Syrian airspace. The report pointed out the airbases in Kobani and Rmelan as places where the radars were installed.
The
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights was informed by reliable sources
that negotiations are underway between the Turkish intelligence
services and between Hayyaat Tahrir al-Sham [Syria’s Al Qaeda
branch, formerly called “Al Nusra”], The Islamic Turkestani
Party, and other jihadi groups, with the aim of reaching agreement
and consensus for these factions to resolve themselves, where these
endeavors coincide with accelerated preparations by the regime forces
and their loyal fighters for the start of the grand battle of
Idlib [the place to which the surrendered jihadists in Syria
have been sent], through which the regime forces seek to control the
province and other areas in its surroundings of Aleppo, Hama, and
Latakia provinces, and the continuation of negotiation comes after
the conflicted information about reaching consensus on this issue,
where Hayyaat Tahrir al-Sham and the rest of the groups continue to
experience confusion among their leaders and members, as a section of
which has agreed to the demands of the Turkish authorities to resolve
themselves, while the larger section rejects this process and refuses
to approve any of the Turkish terms within the Negotiations. …
[In
the] Idlib battle, … Hayyaat Tahrir al-Sham controls the largest
part of Idlib province, and shares it with other 3 parties: the rebel
and Islamic factions, the Islami Turkestani Party, and the regime
forces and militiamen loyal to them.
The
military operation to be conducted in Idlib province, … the regime
forces and their allies have been significantly preparing over the
past weeks, by bringing in thousands of members of their forces and
loyal gunmen as well as hundreds of faction fighters who have
recently joined the “reconciliation”, and hundreds of vehicles,
armored vehicles, ammunition, and machinery….
Hayyaat
Tahrir al-Sham … is one of the renewed names of al-Nusra Front
(al-Qaeda Organization in the Levant)…
The
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitored the regime forces
bringing more vehicles, members, materiel and ammunition, to these
lines, and in conjunction with these mobilizations by the regime
forces, the SOHR monitored on the 21st of August 2018 the leader of
Al-Nusra Front (Hayyaat Tahrir al-Sham) Abu Mohammad al-Julani,
taking a military tour in the northern mountains of Lattakia, where
al-Julani reviewed with a number of the commanders of the first and
second rank in Hayyaat Tahrir al-Sham, the members of Tahrir Al-Sham
and the front lines.
Like
other reports by U.S.-allied organizations, Syria’s Government is
called “the regime” instead of “the Government,” and the
jihadists (except for ISIS) are accepted as being the U.S. alliance’s
boots-on-the-ground in Syria to ‘liberate’ the Syrian people from
Syria’s Government.
So,
the U.S. Government can hardly call this allegation of U.S. working
in conjunction with Al Qaeda, ‘Russian propaganda’. However, on
that very same day, August 28th, RT bannered “US
army accuses RT of ‘ridiculous misinformation’ over Syria, but
not UN or NBC”,
and reported:
A US Army colonel has accused RT of ‘ridiculous misinformation’ for reporting a Russian government suggestion that Islamic State is operating inside a US-controlled zone in Syria, despite the UN and NBC reporting the same.”
On
August 25th, RT had headlined “Terrorists
readying chemical attack to frame Damascus & provide pretext for
US strikes – Russian MoD”,
and reported:
The
US and its allies are preparing new airstrikes on Syria, the Russian
Defense Ministry said, adding that militants are poised to stage a
chemical weapons attack in order to frame Damascus and provide a
pretext for the strikes.
The
attack would be used as a pretext for US, UK and French airstrikes on
Syrian targets, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman, Major General
Igor Konashenkov said. USS ‘The Sullivans,’ an Arleigh
Burke-class Aegis guided missile destroyer, was already deployed to
the Persian Gulf a couple of days ago, he added.
The
destroyer has 56 cruise missiles on board, according to data from the
Russian Defence Ministry. A US Rockwell B-1 Lancer, a supersonic
bomber equipped with 24 cruise missiles, has also been deployed at
the Qatari Al Udeid Airbase.
On
August 24th, RT had headlined “ISIS
& Al-Nusra terrorists are hiding in Syrian refugee camp within
US-controlled zone – Moscow”,
and reported that:
Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) and the Al-Qaeda proxy group Jabhat al-Nusra found quiet shelter in one of the biggest camps, Rukban, near the Syria-Jordan border. … The same refugee camp was listed in a recent UN Security Council’s Sanctions Monitoring Team report as one of the sources of IS reemergence. The same document reported that ISIS had been defeated in most of the Syrian Arab Republic during 2017, but ‘rallied in early 2018’ due to ‘loss of momentum’ by forces fighting in the east of Syria, where the US base is located.”
Rukban … is an arid remote area near the extreme northeast of Jordan, close to the joint borders with Syria and Iraq. The area contains a refugee camp lying along the demilitarized berm between Jordan and Syria, a no man’s land.”
That
would be an ideal place for the U.S. and its allies to be assembling
the materials for what will be alleged to be a chemical weapons
attack ‘by the Assad regime’. Rukban is located in Jordan, a U.S.
ally, and adjoining Syria, of which the U.S. has been an enemy ever
since first failing in 1949 to turn Syria into a land controlled by
the Saud family, as Obama and now Trump are again trying to do.
I
had reported, on
August 25th,
the history of this sort of operation by the U.S. Government, going
back to 1949, and mentioning recent faked ‘chemical attacks’ set
up by the U.S. Government working in conjuction with Al Qaeda in
Syria. So: with that lengthy history as background, there exists very
sound reason for Syria and its allies to be expecting now yet another
invasion of Syiria by U.S.-and-allied missiles, to be ‘justified’
on the basis of lies.
The
latest of America’s missile-invasions of Syria occurred back on 14
April 2018, allegedly in response to a Syrian Government ‘chemical
weapons attack’ in the city of Douma, which had allegedly occurred
on April 7th. Russia tried to get the U.N. Security Council to
announce that no invasion of Syria should occur until after the OPCW
would enter Douma and collect samples and testimony to determine
whether any such attack had actually occurred; and, if so, who had
done it. The U.S. blocked that proposal, and invaded on the 14th.
Despite that, the OPCW rushed in, to examine Douma, even after the
invasion. On April 18th, America’s jihadist allies in Douma shot
at OPCW inspectors,
who courageously continued their work, despite the U.S. Government’s
repeated efforts to stop it. The OPCW’s findings have been kept
secret, so that the public still doesn’t know what the evidence
about that April 7th matter actually showed.
Also
on April 18th, Turkey’s newspaper Yeni
Safak headlined “US
to build Arab force in NE Syria as part of new ploy: The
US is seeking to amass an Arab force in northeastern Syria comprised
of funding and troops from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE.”
That
effort by Trump failed; so, the only path forward for him on Syria
now is a U.S. invasion, but this one will have to be much larger than
the last one, which was done on April 14th, and in which UK and
France also supplied a few of the 100+ missiles. Perhaps, if the U.S.
does that, Russia will this time target and maybe destroy some U.S.
planes and warships. Then, the question would be whether to go to
all-out nuclear war, over the Syrian matter and, of course, over
America’s other excuses for its aggressions against Russia and its
allies, such as America’s
2014 conquest of Ukraine and turning that country over to nazis
Perhaps
these are the reasons why Russia is announcing clearly, ahead of
time, that it won’t simply acquiesce if the U.S. tries this faked
accusation against Syria, yet again. Perhaps things won’t be so
easy, if there is a “next time” on this particular matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.