Gut-wrenching
but practically guaranteed.
The
EU Will Not Stand by Iran
12 May, 2018
While European leaders
have made noises that they will defy Donald Trump’s reneging on the
Iran nuclear deal and resist U.S. sanctions, in the end the Europeans
will give in to U.S., argues Alexander Mercouris in this commentary.
By
Alexander Mercouris
Ever since Donald Trump’s
announcement that the U.S. would pull out of the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action (“JCPOA”) with Iran and would unilaterally impose
across-the-board sanctions on that country, a procession of European
leaders including the leaders of the U.S.’s most powerful European
allies – Britain, France and Germany – have publicly declared
their intention to stand by the JCPOA.
There is also brave talk
of the EU creating safeguards for European companies which in
defiance of the U.S. continue to trade or do business with Iran.
President Rouhani of Iran
– who has a big personal stake in the JCPOA, which he personally
negotiated – has for his part said that Iran will for the time
being abide by the terms of the JCPOA whilst it waits to see how
Europe will react.
In the meantime the talk
of the EU standing up to the U.S. over the JCPOA has increased talk –
or hope – that a corner in U.S.-EU relations has been turned, and
that the EU will henceforth increasingly defy the U.S., making Donald
Trump’s decision to pull out of the JCPOA a further step in the
decline of U.S. power.
These words of Craig Murray’s may stand as
a good example:
“We are yet to see the
detail, but by all precedent Trump’s Iran sanctions will also
sanction third country companies which trade with Iran, at the least
through attacking their transactions through U.S. financial
institutions and by sanctioning their U.S. affiliates.
But at a time when U.S.
share of the world economy and world trade is steadily shrinking,
this encouragement to European and Asian companies to firewall and
minimise contact with the U.S. is most unlikely to be long term
beneficial to the U.S. In particular, in a period where it is already
obvious that the years of the U.S. dollar’s undisputed dominance as
the world currency of reference are drawing to a close, the incentive
to employ non-U.S. linked means of financial transaction will add to
an already highly significant global trend.
In short, if the U.S.
fails to prevent Europe and Asia’s burgeoning trade with Iran –
and I think they will fail – this moment will be seen by historians
as a key marker in U.S. decline as a world power.”
I do not share these
expectations or these hopes.
Whilst there is no doubt
European leaders are deeply shocked by Trump’s announcement of a
pullout from an international agreement in negotiating which the EU
played a large part, I strongly doubt that they will find the courage
or the willpower to defy the U.S. by in effect encouraging their
companies to continue to do business with Iran.
Market Size Matters
It should be said that
even with such active encouragement it is unlikely in my opinion that
big European companies like Daimler or Airbus will risk U.S. fines by
continuing to do business with Iran. Even if European governments
were to guarantee them against any losses caused by such fines, they
would worry about losing access to the U.S. market, which utterly
dwarfs Iran’s.
Given the head of steam
that has built up inside the Trump administration against Iran, only
if the EU were to threaten publicly to impose reciprocal sanctions on
U.S. businesses doing business in the European Single Market might
there be a real possibility of the US being deterred from imposing
penalties on European companies which continue to do business with
Iran.
Frankly I think there is
no prospect of that happening because there is no unanimity within
the EU behind it (Poland and the Baltic States would certainly oppose
it) whilst I am sure that even the big EU states – Britain,
Germany, France, and Italy – would in the end be unwilling to risk
an all out rupture with the U.S. on such an issue.
Quite simply, though the
Europeans are anxious to trade with Iran and to do business with
Iran, Iran is not big enough, and trade with Iran is not important
enough, to make the risk of an all-out rupture with the U.S.
worthwhile.
I am sure that the
Europeans – angry though they certainly are – will therefore in
the end knuckle down, and do as the U.S. tells them to do.
That almost certainly
means that the JCPOA is doomed. The Iranians have made clear that
they will not stick with it if there are no economic benefits to them
from doing so. I expect within a few weeks – as it becomes
increasingly clear that the EU is not prepared to defy the U.S. –
that the Iranian nuclear programme will resume with a vengeance.
At that point the danger
of a U.S., Israeli and Saudi attack on Iran will grow.
In fact this episode has
been a profoundly humiliating one for Europe, exposing the extent of
its powerlessness.
Not only did Trump ignore
pleas to stand by the JCPOA from the U.S.’s closest European allies
– Merkel, Macron and May – but he apparently did not even inform
them in advance of the sweeping sanctions on Iran which he had
decided to impose.
The European leader who
has come out worst from this affair is France’s vain and foolish
President Emmanuel Macron.
Macron appears to have
genuinely believed that he had forged some sort of personal
relationship with Trump, and that France’s contribution to the
U.S.’s recent strike on Syria had made this bond even stronger.
In reality what Macron’s
recent trip to Washington has done is simply expose the extent to
which Trump and the U.S. take neither him nor France seriously. All
his pleas were ignored, whilst his fawning behaviour towards Trump
apparently went down badly back home.
As for Angela Merkel, she
at least avoided in her trip to Washington the disastrous optics of
Macron’s visit. She is far too skilled and experienced a
politician to be caught out in that way.
However no-one should be
in any doubt that it is Merkel’s disastrous leadership of Germany
and of Europe which has brought Europe to this pass.
Merkel, Macron and May,
Not Maggie
Ever since she became
German Chancellor she has repeatedly sacrificed European and German
interests in order to avoid rocking the boat with the U.S.
In July 2014 she took the
fateful step of supporting the U.S.’s demand for sectoral sanctions
against Russia even though these were contrary to German economic
interests, in effect legitimising the U.S. practice of imposing
unilateral sanctions without the agreement of the UN Security
Council. That makes it all but impossible to see how she can
realistically oppose such sanctions now.
The contrast with
Margaret Thatcher – who in the 1980s vigorously opposed unilateral
U.S. sanctions intended to block Russian pipeline projects – is
instructive.
In fact European
behaviour over the JCPOA has been a textbook case of appeasement.
Instead of telling Donald
Trump that a unilateral withdrawal from the JCPOA would be contrary
to international law – which it is – and that Europe would
strongly oppose US withdrawal from an international agreement which
was not only working but with which Iran is abiding, European leaders
like Merkel, Macron and May instead told Trump that they agreed with
him that the JCPOA was in some way “imperfect” and would have to
be “improved”.
Needless to say that not
only failed to persuade Donald Trump to stick with the JCPOA; it
almost certainly emboldened him, convincing him that he is right to
pull out of it.
Trump’s decision to
pull out of the JCPOA and to impose sweeping unilateral sanctions on
Iran will undoubtedly embitter European opinion against the U.S. It
is also likely to make Europe more resistant to any further U.S.
pressure to ramp up sanctions against Russia. Unlike trade with
Iran, European and especially German trade with Russia is
indispensable for the European and German economies, which explains
why constant U.S. pressure on Germany to pull out of the Nord Stream
2 project has been resisted.
In the longer term this
episode probably will harden further the anti-U.S. trend in voting on
the part of European electorates, though it is worth pointing out
that some of the right wing ‘populist’ European politicians who
have benefitted from this process are not friends of Iran’s.
However in the immediate
term Iran’s economic salvation as it finds itself under renewed
sanctions pressure will come not from Europe but from Russia and
China and the other Eurasian states.
This commentary
originally appeared on The Duran.
Alexander Mercouris is a
political commentator and the editor-in-chief of The Duran.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.