14
Signs That There Is A Plot To Use Russia As An Excuse To Steal The
Presidency From Trump On December 19th Or January 6th
By
Michael Snyder
12
December, 2016
Donald
Trump could have the election legally stolen from him on either
December 19th when the Electoral College casts their votes or on
January 6th when a joint session of Congress gathers to count those
votes. The establishment is in full-blown panic mode at this
point, and they seem to have settled on “Russian interference in
the election” as the angle that they plan to use to try to deny
Trump the presidency. As you will see below, there is an
all-out effort to try to persuade members of the Electoral College
that are supposed to be committed to Donald Trump to cast their votes
for someone else instead. And if that doesn’t work, the
groundwork is being laid for the Electoral College votes to
potentially be invalidated when a joint session of Congress meets to
count those votes on January 6th. I will explain how that would
work later on in this article, but first let’s take a look at 14
signs that indicate that there is a plot to use Russia as an excuse
to steal the presidency from Donald Trump…
#1 A
group of 10 presidential electors has sent a
letter to
National Intelligence Director James Clapper asking to be briefed on
Russian efforts to interfere in the election in November. This
group is being led by Nancy Pelosi’s daughter Christine.
#2 The
Clinton campaign is
publicly supporting the effort to
arrange for the members of the Electoral College to be given an
“intelligence briefing” on Russian interference in the election
before they cast their votes.
#3 White
House spokesman Josh Earnest claims that Donald Trump “called
on Russia to hack his opponent” and
that Trump “benefited from malicious Russian cyberactivity”.
#4 Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has
announced that
he supports an investigation into “Russian election interference”.
#5 On Sunday,
U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer, Jack Reed, John McCain and Lindsey
Graham announced that they very much desire to see an investigation
into Russian interference in the election.
#6 U.S.
Representative David Cicilline is
urging electors to
consider the “extent that foreign interference in the United States
presidential elections may have influenced the final result” before
they cast their votes.
#7 U.S.
Representative Jim Himes is calling Donald Trump “a
danger to the republic” and
is publicly encouraging members of the Electoral College to
vote for someone other than Donald Trump on
December 19th. I don’t recall any member of Congress ever
suggesting members of the Electoral College do such a thing in any
other election.
#8 Time
Magazine is openly
lobbying for
members of the Electoral College to vote for someone other than
Donald Trump on December 19th.
#9 The
former acting director of the CIA has boldly proclaimed that Russian
attempts to alter the outcome of the election in November were “the
political equivalent of 9/11″.
#10 Former
CIA agent Bob Baer recently went on CNN and publicly
called for a new election if
it can be shown that the first election was not legitimate due to
Russian interference.
#11 Former
CIA operative and erstwhile presidential candidate Evan McMullin
says that Donald Trump is “not
a loyal American”
because his views are not anti-Russian enough.
#12 The Huffington
Post is
touting a 1995 federal court ruling as a precedent that could be used
to take the presidency from Donald Trump and hand it to Hillary
Clinton if a court finds that Russian interference altered the
outcome of the election.
#13 Hillary
Clinton’s Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri is
now claiming that
a “foreign state” tried to hack her Gmail account just days
before the election.
#14 Barack
Obama has ordered the intelligence community to gather all of the
evidence that it can find of Russian interference in the election and
to deliver that evidence to him before
he leaves office.
Most
Trump supporters do not realize how very serious this is. The
establishment absolutely hates Trump and wants to find a way to keep
him from taking office. Now that they have gained traction with
this “Russian hacking” angle, they plan to push this as hard as
they can. An article that was just posted by Time
Magazine explained
why this issue could potentially cause some members of the Electoral
College to change their votes…
And still further, we now learn that the Russians played a significant role in manipulating information available to the American people in a concerted effort to bring about the election of Trump. Even if this was not Trump’s doing, is it not the duty of the members of the Electoral College to consider whether the 2016 presidential election was undermined by a foreign power? And mustn’t it matter that the foreign power did so in order to bring about the election of a particular candidate? As Alexander Hamilton made clear, this was, one of the chief concerns of the Framers. As Hamilton explained in The Federalist Papers, a primary reason for the Electoral College was the need to protect our nation against “the desire of foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils . . . by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union.”
Of
course this is completely and utterly ridiculous, but this is the
kind of mental gymnastics that they are going through right now.
They want to feel justified in denying Donald Trump the presidency,
and so they are going to make this “Russian interference in the
election” into the biggest issue that they possibly can.
Which
is ironic, because as Paul
Joseph Watson has
pointed out, foreigners have been influencing our elections and we
have been influencing foreign elections for many, many years…
Isn’t it funny how all you democrats who cry over foreign influence had no objection whatsoever to Saudi Arabia bankrolling Hillary’s campaign. You had no problem taking all that George Soros money, did you? You had no problem with the Obama State Department overthrowing the government of Ukraine. You had no problem with Obama interfering in the U.K.’s referendum on leaving the EU.
But
ultimately this is not about Russian interference in our election.
Rather, this is all about the elite doing whatever is necessary to stop Donald Trump. The elite are going to fight against him every step of the way, and they are never, ever going to give up. This is a point that I made during an interview with Alex Jones on Monday…
The
next key date that we need to be watching for is December 19h.
On
Monday, members of the Electoral College will gather in Washington
D.C. and in all 50 state capitols to cast their votes. We know
that at least one Republican elector that is supposed to be pledged
to Trump will not be voting for him, and that elector claims that
there are others that
also will not be voting for Trump.
If
37 Republican electors can be persuaded to cast their votes for
someone other than Trump, that would throw the election into the
House of Representatives, and it is unclear what the House would do
in that scenario.
If
Trump is not stopped at the Electoral College, there is also the
possibility that he could be derailed when a joint session of
Congress gathers to count the Electoral votes on January 6th.
As
I discussed yesterday,
all it takes to force a vote on the validity of Electoral College
votes is an objection in writing that is signed by at least one
member of the House and one member of the Senate. As the
official House.gov website explains,
if both the House and the Senate vote to approve the objection, the
votes covered by the objection are not counted…
Since 1887, 3 U.S.C. 15 sets the method for objections to electoral votes. During the Joint Session, Members of Congress may object to individual electoral votes or to state returns as a whole. An objection must be declared in writing and signed by at least one Representative and one Senator. In the case of an objection, the Joint Session recesses and each chamber considers the objection separately in a session which cannot last more than two hours with each Member speaking for no more than five minutes. After each house votes on whether or not to accept the objection, the Joint Session reconvenes and both chambers disclose their decisions. If they agree to the objection, the votes in question are not counted. If either chamber does not agree with the objection, the votes are counted.
In
both the Senate and the House, there are anti-Trump Republicans that
would absolutely cherish the opportunity to deny him the presidency.
I
don’t know if it will happen, but this Russian interference issue
is the kind of thing that could be used to justify taking this kind
of action.
Of
course if the election was stolen from Donald Trump that would likely
throw the entire nation into a state of chaos, but I think that at
this point the elite would be willing to risk just about anything to
keep Donald Trump out of the White House.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.