For some parts of the media this is the first mention of the airstrike on Iraqi positions which gave ISIS an advantage.
Radio New Zealand, for example had this headline,
US mistakenly kills nine Iraq soldiers, mentioning the incident for the first time. Western media has made reference to the Iraqi position.
Pentagon:
US strike that killed Iraqi soldiers could be 'mistake' by both sides
©
/ RT
RT,
26
November, 201
An
airstrike by a US warplane that killed Iraqi soldiers could have
resulted from "a mistake that involved both sides," the
Pentagon chief said, according to AP.
"[Iraqi
Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi] and I agreed that this was an event
that we both regretted and that there would be an investigation of
it, but that these kinds of things happen when you're fighting side
by side,"
US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said on Saturday.
The
US said they are conducting an investigation into the incident, which
was the first confirmed case of friendly fire since the US-led
coalition started a bombing campaign against the terrorist group
Islamic State in Iraq.
Earlier,
Iraq's defense minister said nine servicemen were killed in the
strike.
"The
coalition air forces were covering the advance of army ground troops
near Fallujah because the Iraqi army helicopters were not able to fly
due to the bad weather. The final death toll of the strike is nine
soldiers killed, including an army officer,"
Defense Minister Khaled al-Obeidi told a news conference.
The
Iraqi military earlier reported one fatality in the incident, which
happened some 65 kilometers west of Baghdad, and said nine others
were injured. Soldiers involved in the incident told the media that
as many as 25 troops could have been killed. Medical sources reported
treating at least 20 injured in the wake of the airstrike.
Baghdad
said the US mistake was likely due to Iraqi troops and their
opponents having been close to each other at the time of the bombing.
“The
distance between our forces and the enemy was very close, meters,”
an Iraqi Defense Ministry statement said Friday. “Our
forces got mixd.”
The
assessment was questioned by an Iraqi officer, who was injured by the
US airstrike.
“We
were moving forward and Daesh were retreating, when suddenly the
bombing took place on the forces that were behind us,”
he said on condition of anonymity, using the Arabic abbreviation for
Islamic State.
He added that the fact that senior officers got injured indicates that the airstrike didn't target the frontline.
The
incident fuels suspicions in Iraq that the US-led coalition may be
helping IS rather than fighting against it, a notion that is
widespread in the country. Shiite militias, which are fighting
against IS forces in Iraq, had suffered from American interventions
that helped the terrorists in the past, militia commander Hakim
al-Zamili told RT. Al-Zamili also heads the Iraqi parliament’s
defense and security committee.
“We
don't believe it was a technical mistake. We constantly see that the
United States are trying to provide air cover to Islamic State. They
are preventing us from making an offensive,”
he said.
“I
think everyone is now convinced that the United States is not sincere
in its fight against Islamic State. Maybe they have another agenda.
The Pentagon, the CIA and other agencies in the US are trying to make
a [rift] between Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq,”
he added. “They
are trying to tear [apart] Iraq with the help of their allies like
Turkey and the Gulf states.”
The
Shia militias are fighting against IS with the help of instructors
and officers from Iran. The US refuses to coordinate its combat
missions in Iraq with Tehran. Some members of the US-led coalition,
such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey, see Iran as an enemy and would
oppose any cooperation with Tehran.
The
attack on Iraqi troops is the second embarrassing incident for the US
Air Force in recent months. In early October, American warplanes
bombed a hospital run by the international aid organization Doctors
Without Borders in Afghanistan city of Kunduz, killing at least 42
people. Amid widespread condemnation, Washington said the strike was
a mistake and issued a presidential apology, a rare development for
incident involving civilian casualties caused by US bombings.
For a bit of accurate context, see this -
“If only we had an air force to provide air cover when we are fighting in the field.” Yesterday they got their wish (again).
“If only we had an air force to provide air cover when we are fighting in the field.” Yesterday they got their wish (again).
‘ISIS Air Force’: US Airstrike Takes Out Battalion of Iraqi Troops Who Were Battling ISIS
21st
Century Wire says…
ISIS
terrorists have often lamented, “if only we had an air force to
provide air cover when we are fighting in the field.” Yesterday
they got their wish (again).
The
dubious US-led ‘Anti-ISIL Coalition’ continues to spiral out of
control. As Iraqi soldiers closed in on ISIS terrorists on the
ground, a US airstrike struck their column – killing approximately
20 Iraqi soldiers and injuring at least 30 more (see full report
below). Additional casualty reports could rise over the coming days.
According
to Hakim al-Zamili, head of the Iraqi Parliament’s Security and
Defense Committee, this latest incident is said to have occurred
near Al-Naimiya in
the Fallujah province, after the Iraqi troops freed “a
strategically important area”
from ISIS.
What
was the US reaction to this dangerous move? Washington’s answer:
“We’re looking into it.”
According
to Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov:
“If
they were not involved in that airstrike, than why are the Pentagon’s
representatives, as leaders of the anti-ISIS coalition, hushing up
the presence of their allies’ aircraft in the Deir ez-Zor region on
December 6? Isn’t it because the [anti-ISIS] coalition air force
gets all the information on Islamic State targets in Syria from the
Pentagon?” he
asked.
This
is not the first time the US Air Force has targeted legal military
forces fighting against ISIS and al Qaeda on the ground. Two weeks
ago, the US did the same thing in Syria. RT
International reports:
“Earlier,
the Russian Defense Ministry said four Western coalition warplanes
had been spotted over the Deir ez-Zor area in Syria on December 6,
when a Syrian Army camp came under attack. An airstrike on a field
camp of the 168th Brigade of the 7th Division of the Syrian Army left
four servicemen dead and 12 injured. It also destroyed three APCs and
four vehicles bearing 12.7mm heavy machine guns.”
Since
the US-led Anti-ISIS Coalition began 15 months ago, Washington claims
to have been waging war against ISIS, but clearly that has not been
the case – as the US-led effort has actually coincided with a
massive increase in
ISIS-held territory in both Iraq and Syria. One can only conclude
here that the real US agenda was never to defeat ISIS
and al Qaeda/al Nusra on
the ground, but rather to facilitate their growth. The facts on the
ground lead to this conclusion. It was only after
Russia legally entered
the Syrian Conflict on the side of the Syrian government and its army
– that ISIS and al Qaeda positions began to rapidly recede in
Syria. The facts on the ground lead to that conclusion as well.
It’s
already confirmed – beyond any doubt – that US
and NATO allies Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are arming and funding
al Qaeda (al Nusra) in Syria – this with the full
knowledge and endorsement of Washington DC.
In
addition, despite Washington’s denial of the facts, US
lethal weapons and support are making it into the hands of ISIS and
al Qaeda in Syria, and US ally Israel is also aiding terrorist
fighters in Syria too.
Sadly,
statements by US officials continue to languish in an imaginary zone
of suspended disbelief and outright deception regarding Syria, and
terrorist militants on the ground who are benefiting from the
so-called US-led ‘Coalition’…
A
least 20 Iraqi soldiers have been killed and 30 injured in an
airstrike carried out by the US military, Hakim al-Zamili, head of
the Iraqi Parliament’s Security and Defense Committee, told Sputnik
news agency.
.
“The
55th brigade [of the Iraqi Army] was hit by the US aviation. More
than 20 soldiers were killed and over 30 servicemen were wounded as a
result of the airstrike,” Zamili
said.
The
incident occurred near the town of Al-Naimiya in the Fallujah
province after the Iraqi troops had freed “a
strategically important area” from
the Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) militants, he dded.
According
to the official, who visited the site of the attack and personally
talked to commanders and soldiers of the 55th brigade, the death toll
may well rise, as many Iraqi soldiers were heavily injured.
The
Americans carry out airstrikes with 100% precision… How could have
they mistaken by kilometers?” he
wondered.
Zamili
said “it’s
very dangerous” that
the Iraqi forces are being hit by airstrikes and that the country
“won’t
allow it” to
happen again.
The
MP called upon the Iraqi Prime Minister, Haider Al-Abadi, to carry
out an immediate investigation into the airstrike.
According
to the official, Iraq is going to go to court over the incident
as “this
crime mustn’t go unpunished.”
However,
the Iraqi Army’s Command Centre in Baghdad, the capital, said the
air the strike had caused fewer casualties and happened due to
miscommunication and bad weather.
“We
[Iraqi Forces Command] had demanded aerial support from the
international coalition air force. The airstrike was launched without
an update on the advance of the Iraqi forces and the coalition forces
were unable to distinguish between the fighters on the ground due to
bad weather,” it
said.
According
to the Iraqi military, one Iraqi army commander was killed and nine
servicemen were injured in the airstrike.
A
Pentagon representative told RIA Novosti they are looking into the
report.
Earlier,
the Russian Defense Ministry said four Western coalition warplanes
had been spotted over the Deir ez-Zor area in Syria on December 6,
when a Syrian Army camp came under attack.
An
airstrike on a field camp of the 168th Brigade of the 7th Division of
the Syrian Army left four servicemen dead and 12 injured. It also
destroyed three APCs and four vehicles bearing 12.7mm heavy machine
guns.
The
information about two pairs of warplanes, members of the US-led
international anti-ISIS coalition, which were operating in the Deir
ez-Zor area on the day of the attack, was announced by Russian
Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov.
“If
they were not involved in that airstrike, than why are the Pentagon’s
representatives, as leaders of the anti-ISIS coalition, hushing up
the presence of their allies’ aircraft in the Deir ez-Zor region on
December 6? Isn’t it because the [anti-ISIS] coalition air force
gets all the information on Islamic State targets in Syria from the
Pentagon?” he
asked.
The
US has been bombing IS positions in Iraq since August 2014. However,
according to Iraq’s former PM Nouri al-Maliki, this campaign has
been “unbelievably” ineffective
in fighting the terror group.
“It’s
unbelievable and unacceptable that more than 60 nations comprising
this coalition that have the most modern aircraft and weapons at
their disposal have been conducting their campaign in Iraq for 14
months and IS still remains in the country,” he
told RT’s Arabic-language sister-channel Rusiya Al-Yaum in
November.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.