New
Zealand banks are falling slavishy into line with American demands
who are taxed twice.
Not
so the Swiss.
Swiss
Banks Tell American Expats to Empty Their Accounts
“My
U.S. passport has been such a liability,” complains one Zurich
resident, as Swiss banks crack down on U.S.-owned accounts following
new, strict American legislation coming into effect next year
Time,
20
December, 2015
A
few months ago, Geneva journalist Christophe Ungar got quite a shock:
without any prior notice, his local bank closed out his mutual funds
account, resulting in considerable losses due to the early
withdrawal. This was not an inadvertent mistake, but, rather, an
intentional move to oust Ungar, a US citizen, from the financial
institution where he had banked for years. “When the bank realized
I was American, they started treating me like I had the plague,” he
says.
This
scenario is all too familiar to another American, Geneva financial
adviser Anne Hornung-Soukup. Her accounts – including a pension
investment fund – were suddenly closed in recent months by her two
banks, each explaining in a letter that its services are no longer
available to US citizens.
“This
really ticks me off,” says Hornung-Soukup, who adds that the forced
early withdrawal of her retirement fund meant she had to pay taxes on
it earlier than she had anticipated.
Neither
Hornung-Soukup nor Ungar’s case is unique or even rare. According
to the Geneva-based expatriate advocacy group, American Citizens
Abroad (ACA), which follows this issue closely, increasing numbers of
US nationals in Switzerland are being denied banking services.
However, according to ACA tax director Jackie Bugnon, the banks may
not be totally to blame since they are “held hostage to US
policies,” which require opening of American-held accounts to the
scrutiny of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
The
backlash against US clients has been building up since 2008, with the
news that Switzerland’s largest financial institution, UBS, helped
wealthy Americans hide billions of dollars in undisclosed offshore
accounts to evade taxes. The bank had to pay a $780 million fine and
release the names of 250 suspected American tax dodgers. In recent
years, however, Swiss banks have stepped up their efforts to curb the
flow of undeclared money from the U.S. and elsewhere.
The
United States is the only developed country (the other one is
Eritrea) that taxes its citizens who live overseas, even if their
income is generated in a foreign country and they live abroad
permanently. Due to the financial burden of double taxation – by
their country of residence and the U.S.–growing numbers of US
citizens take the drastic step of relinquishing their American
nationality. This year, nearly 2,400 expatriates have given up their
U.S. citizenship or turned in their green cards. While this number
may seem miniscule, it represents a 33% increase over 2011; experts
say the real numbers are much higher because thousands of
applications are still waiting to be processed.
Because
of its tax policy, the U.S government has created a myriad of
requirements for other nations to follow in order to ensure that no
foreign account belonging to an American goes untaxed by Uncle Sam.
The latest such regulation is the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
(FATCA), which was passed by Congress in 2010 and goes into effect on
January 1, 2014. It requires foreign banks to report to IRS all the
assets exceeding $50,000 that belong to US citizens – whether
living in America or abroad. Additionally, in August Switzerland
signed a separate treaty with the United States, ending a
longstanding tax dispute between the two countries, that also gave
the IRS unprecedented access to Swiss accounts held by Americans and
US green card holders.
Banks
are reluctantly abiding by the new rules because of hefty fines –
the IRS can withhold 30% of dividends and interest payments due to
the banks from U.S accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations
can seriously impact the Swiss banks’ ability to do business in
America. “This is very risky for a financial institution because an
indictment could bar the bank from the US capital market,” says
Sindy Schmiegel, spokesperson for the Swiss Banking Association, an
umbrella group for Switzerland’s financial institutions.
But
the compliance with the US rules doesn’t come cheap – banks have
to set up special logistics to deal with American clients and the
Swiss government estimates the cost of FATCA reporting in a
double-digit million figure for bigger financial institutions.
Therefore, banks prefer the “better safe than sorry” approach
that excludes American clients and the meddlesome oversight of the
United States government. But for tens of thousands of US nationals
living in Switzerland, no access to financial services means
inability to set up retirement accounts, obtain loans, mortgages, or
even rent an apartment.
“My
U.S. passport has been such a liability,” says a Zurich resident
who identifies herself only as “Jeannie.” Not only was she not
allowed to open a savings account at any of the four banks she
visited last month, but even her Swiss husband was denied a mortgage
because Jeannie’s name was on a joint account. “We were told that
they don’t deal with Americans because of all the hassle,” she
says. “This really makes me mad – how am I supposed to have a
normal life if I don’t have access to a bank?”
Paradoxically,
regulations that were intended to catch and punish tax cheats are
making life difficult for ordinary, middle-class people who have
always played by the rules. Many, like Hornung-Soukup, have lived
overseas for decades, and others, like Ungar, have only tenuous ties
to the U.S. — his father is American but he himself was born in
Switzerland, never lived in the U.S. at all, and has no plans to move
there.
The
denial of bank services is most acute in Switzerland because the
August agreement it signed with the US has accelerated the impact of
FATCA. But once the law kicks in worldwide next month, an estimated 7
million Americans who live in other countries will likely face
similar difficulties. In fact, some have already experienced
problems; at an ACA town hall meeting held last week in London, about
a third of the participants said they either had an account closed
already or the threat of closing was held over their heads.
So
far, no relief is in sight, but in October ACA’s executive director
Marylouise Serrato wrote a letter to Robert Stack, IRS’ Deputy
Assistant Secretary, noting that while the organization supports the
government’s efforts to combat tax evasion, banking services would
be more accessible to US nationals abroad if financial accounts
located – and taxed – in the country of residence would not be
subject to FATCA reporting.
The
letter remains unanswered, which means that, for now at least,
financial services are one commodity Americans living abroad can no
longer bank on.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.