Biggest
Loser: Thawing Greenland Competes With Collapsing Antarctic For
Fastest Ice Loss
Several
new studies underscore scientists’ concerns we’re headed toward a
coastline at least this flooded (20 meters or 69 feet) over many
hundreds of years
Joe
Romm
A
glacier in southwest Greenland flows down a rocky canyon like those
mapped in a new study. Hundreds of previously unknown coastal canyons
that are buried under the ice “could contribute to far higher sea
level rise than previously predicted.” Via NASA.
20
May, 2014
The
worst-case scenario for sea level rise has now become simply the
“business-as-usual” scenario, recent studies from NASA make
clear. NASA glaciologist Eric Rignot, co-author of a new Greenland
study, says
that, taken together, the new papers “suggest that the globe’s
ice sheets will contribute far more to sea level rise than current
projections show.”
That
means if we don’t reverse carbon pollution emissions trends ASAP,
sea level rise will likely be 4 to 5 feet or more by century’s end.
Also, the rate
of sea level rise in 2100 could be upwards of 1 inch per YEAR!
No
one has any concept of how to adapt cities, ports, infrastructure and
the like to such a rate of sea level rise. This underscores the New
York Times reporting
last week that we are risking “enough sea-level rise that many of
the world’s coastal cities would eventually have to be abandoned.”
Last
week two
studies provided evidence
that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has begun an irreversible process
of collapse, in part because its key glaciers are grounded below sea
level and are melting
from underneath.
Now,
a team of researchers from NASA and UC Irvine reports
that the Greenland ice sheet has a similar instability:
Greenland’s
icy reaches are far more vulnerable to warm ocean waters from climate
change than had been thought,
according to new research by UC Irvine and NASA glaciologists. The
work, published today in Nature
Geoscience,
shows previously uncharted deep valleys stretching for dozens of
miles under the Greenland Ice Sheet.
The
bedrock canyons sit well below sea level, meaning that as subtropical
Atlantic waters hit the fronts of hundreds of glaciers, those edges
will erode much further than had been assumed and release far greater
amounts of water.
We’ve
known for a while that the Greenland ice sheet has been melting at an
“extraordinary” rate, “with nearly a five-fold increase since
the mid-1990s,” as one 2012
study
reported. The new study shatters the conventional wisdom that such an
accelerating melt rate was not sustainable:
Ice
melt from the subcontinent has already accelerated as warmer marine
currents have migrated north, but older models predicted that once
higher ground was reached in a few years, the ocean-induced melting
would halt. Greenland’s frozen mass would stop shrinking, and its
effect on higher sea waters would be curtailed.
“That
turns out to be incorrect. The glaciers of Greenland are likely to
retreat faster and farther inland than anticipated – and for much
longer – according to this very different topography we’ve
discovered beneath the ice,” said lead author Mathieu Morlighem, a
UC Irvine associate project scientist. “This has major
implications, because the glacier melt will contribute much more to
rising seas around the globe.”
That
2012 study had also found that Antarctica’s rate of ice loss rose
50 percent in the decade of the 2000s. Now, a new paper
out this week looks at “3 years of Cryosat-2 radar altimeter data
to develop the first comprehensive assessment of Antarctic ice sheet
elevation change.”
Three
years of observations show that the Antarctic ice sheet is now losing
159 billion tonnes of ice each year – twice
as much as when it was last surveyed….
Lead
author Dr Malcolm McMillan from the University of Leeds said: “We
find that ice losses continue to be most pronounced along the
fast-flowing ice streams of the Amundsen Sea sector, with thinning
rates of between 4 and 8 metres per year near to the grounding lines
of the Pine Island, Thwaites and Smith Glaciers.”
So
Antarctica’s ice loss is accelerating, and the greatest ice loss is
exactly where last
week’s studies
said the risk of glacier collapse is the greatest.
Climatologist
Richard Alley told me “The new Morlighem, Rignot et al study in
Greenland is solid.” And since most sea level rise analyses use the
older, incorrect topology for the ice sheet beds, they almost
certainly underestimate the amount of sea level rise Greenland will
contribute this century and beyond.
NASA
Glaciologist — and coauthor of two of the recent studies — Eric
Rignot told me:
All
these studies clearly point toward an increasing contribution of ice
sheets to sea level. What the layperson should get out of the recent
news, however, is that ice sheet melting is a serious thing, there is
no red button to stop it, we can slow it down or get it as fast as we
can. Right now, we have chosen the latter.
So
the “good” news is that it might take 1000 years (or longer) to
raise sea levels several tens of feet, and the choices we make now
can affect the rate of rise and whether we ultimately blow past 69
feet to beyond
200 feet.
Glaciologist
Jason Box made this point in a 2013 interview, “Humans
Have Already Set in Motion 69 Feet of Sea Level Rise“:
So
what can we do? For Box, any bit of policy helps. “The more we can
cool climate, the slower Greenland’s loss will be,” he explained.
Cutting greenhouse gases slows the planet’s heating, and with it,
the pace of ice sheet losses.
“It’s
like a terrible competition between Greenland and Antarctica for
Biggest Loser,” Box told me today. “Multiple factors have been
combining to produce surprisingly rapid change. This is the hallmark
of a system unable to catch up with an exponentially increasing
forcing.”
This
concern is underscored by the paleoclimate data. In 2012,
the National Science Foundation reported
on paleoclimate research that examined “rock and soil cores taken
in Virginia, New Zealand and the Eniwetok Atoll in the north Pacific
Ocean.” Lead author Kenneth Miller of Rutgers University said:
“The
natural state of the Earth with present carbon dioxide levels is one
with sea levels about 70 feet higher than now.”
And
that was only slightly less worrisome than a 2009 paper in Science
that found the last time CO2 levels were this high, it
was 5° to 10°F warmer and seas were 75 to 120 feet higher.
The
time to act was a quarter century ago, but now remains infinitely
better than later. Otherwise, we’ll end up the biggest loser of
all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.