Did
Saudis, CIA Fear Khashoggi 9/11 Bombshell?
15
October, 2018
The
macabre case of missing journalist Jamal Khashoggi raises the
question: did
Saudi rulers fear him revealing highly damaging information on their
secret dealings? In
particular, possible involvement in the 9/11 terror attacks on New
York in 2001.
Even
more intriguing are US
media reports now
emerging that American intelligence had snooped on and were aware of
Saudi officials making plans to capture Khashoggi prior to his
apparent disappearance at
the Saudi consulate in Istanbul last week. If the Americans knew the
journalist’s life was in danger, why didn’t they tip him off to
avoid his doom?
Jamal
Khashoggi (59) had gone rogue, from the Saudi elite’s point of
view. Formerly
a senior editor in Saudi state media and an advisor to the royal
court, he was imminently connected and versed in House of Saud
affairs. As one commentator cryptically put it: “He knew where all
the bodies were buried.”
For
the past year, Khashoggi went into self-imposed exile, taking up
residence in the US, where he began writing opinion columns for the
Washington Post.
Khashoggi’s
articles appeared to be taking
on increasingly critical tone against the heir to the Saudi throne,
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The
33-year-old Crown Prince, or MbS as he’s known, is de facto ruler
of the oil-rich kingdom, in place of his aging father, King Salman.
While
Western media and several leaders, such as Presidents Trump and
Macron, have been indulging MbS as “a reformer”, Khashoggi was
spoiling this Saudi public relations effort by criticizing the war in
Yemen, the blockade on Qatar and the crackdown on Saudi critics back
home.
However,
what may have caused the Saudi royals more concern was what Khashoggi
knew about darker, dirtier matters. And not just the Saudis, but
American deep state actors as as well.
He
was formerly a media
aide to
Prince Turki al Faisal, who is an eminence gris figure in Saudi
intelligence, with its systematic relations to American and British
counterparts. Prince Turki’s father, Faisal, was formerly the king
of Saudi Arabia until his assassination in 1975 by a family rival.
Faisal was a half-brother of the present king, Salman, and therefore
Prince Turki is a cousin of the Crown Prince – albeit at 73 more
than twice his age.
For
nearly 23 years, from 1977 to 2001, Prince Turki was the director of
the Mukhabarat, the Saudi state intelligence apparatus. He was
instrumental in Saudi, American and British organization of the
mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan to combat Soviet forces. Those
militants in Afghanistan later evolved into the al Qaeda terror
network, which has served as a cat’s paw in various US proxy wars
across the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia, including
Russia’s backyard in the Caucasus.
Ten
days before the 9/11 terror attacks on New York City, in which some
3,000 Americans died, Prince Turki retired from
his post as head of Saudi intelligence. It was an abrupt departure,
well before his tenure was due to expire.
There
has previously been speculation in
US media that this senior Saudi figure knew in advance that something
major was going down on 9/11. At
least 15 of the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked three commercial
airplanes that day were Saudi nationals.
Prince
Turki has subsequently been named in a 2002 lawsuit mounted by
families of 9/11 victims. There is little suggestion he was wittingly
involved in organizing the terror plot. Later public comments
indicated that Prince Turki was horrified by the atrocity. But the
question is: did
he know of the impending incident, and did he alert US intelligence,
which then did not take appropriate action to prevent it?
Jamal Khashoggi
had long served as a trusted media advisor to Prince Turki, before
the latter resigned from public office in 2007. Following 9/11, Turki
was the Saudi ambassador to both the US and Britain.
A
tentative idea here is that Khashoggi, in his close dealings with
Prince Turki over the years, may have gleaned highly sensitive inside
information on what actually happened on 9/11. Were
the Arab hijackers mere patsies used by the American CIA to
facilitate an event which has since been used by American military
planners to launch a global “war on terror” as a cover for
illegal wars overseas? There
is a huge body of evidence that the 9/11 attacks were indeed a “false
flag” event orchestrated by the US deep state as a pretext for its
imperialist rampages.
The
apparent abduction and murder last week of Jamal Khashoggi seems
such an
astoundingly desperate move by the Saudi rulers. More
evidence is emerging from Turkish sources that
the journalist was indeed lured to the consulate in Istanbul where he
was killed by a 15-member hit squad. Reports are saying that the
alleged assassination was ordered at the highest level of the Saudi
royal court, which implicates Crown Prince MbS.
Why
would the Saudi rulers order such a heinous act, which would
inevitably lead to acute political problems, as we are seeing in the
fallout from governments and media coverage around the world?
Over
the past year, the House of Saud had been appealing to Khashoggi to
return to Riyadh and resume his services as a media advisor to the
royal court. He declined, fearing that something more sinister was
afoot. When Khashoggi turned up in Istanbul to collect a divorce
document from the Saudi consulate on September 28, it appears that
the House of Saud decided to nab him. He was told to return to the
consulate on October 2. On that same day, the 15-member group arrived
from Riyadh on two private Gulfstream jets for the mission to kill
him.
Official
Saudi claims stretch credulity. They
say Khashoggi left the consulate building unharmed by a backdoor,
although they won’t provide CCTV images to prove that. The Turks
say their own CCTV facilities monitoring the front and back of the
Saudi consulate show that Khashoggi did not leave the premises. The
Turks seem confident of their claim he was murdered inside the
building, his remains dismembered and removed in diplomatic vehicles.
The two private jets left the same day from Istanbul with the 15
Saudis onboard to return to Riyadh, via Cairo and Dubai.
To
carry out such a reckless act, the Saudis must have been alarmed by
Khashoggi’s critical commentaries appearing in the Washington Post.
The columns appeared to be delivering more and more damaging insights
into the regime under Crown Prince MbS
The
Washington Post this week is reporting that
US intelligence sources knew from telecom intercepts that the Saudis
were planning to abduct Khashoggi. That
implicates the House of Saud in a dastardly premeditated act of
murder.
But
furthermore this same disclosure could also, unwittingly, implicate
US intelligence. If the latter knew of a malicious intent towards
Khashoggi, why didn’t US agents warn him about going to the Saudi
consulate in Istanbul? Surely, he could have obtained the same
personal documents from the Saudi embassy in Washington DC, a country
where he was residing and would have been safer.
Jamal
Khashoggi may have known too many dark secrets about US and Saudi
intel collusion, primarily related to the 9/11 terror incidents. And
with his increasing volubility as a critical journalist in a
prominent American news outlet, it may have been time to silence
him. The
Saudis as hitmen, the American CIA as facilitators.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.