Flood Risk at Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear
reactors are located near bodies of water, introducing unique
flood-related risks.
Union
of Concerned Scientists,
Nuclear
power plants are always situated near a body of water—a river,
lake, estuary or ocean—because they require a plentiful, reliable
source of water for cooling purposes. In the absence of cooling
water, a nuclear reactor will overheat, leading to core damage,
containment failure, and release of harmful radiation into the
environment.
However,
water can quickly turn dangerous when floods occur. Flooding can
damage equipment or knock out the plant's electrical systems,
disabling its cooling mechanisms. This is what happened at the
Fukushima Dai-ichi plant in Japan as a result of the March 2011
tsunami, causing severe damage to several of the plant's reactors.
Floods
due to natural causes
While
tsunamis are not a significant risk for most U.S. nuclear power
plants, there are other natural weather events that can lead to
flooding. Heavy rain or snow can cause rivers to overflow, and
tropical storms or nor'easters can cause storm surges that threaten
coastal plants.
Floods
from such natural weather events have caused problems at several U.S.
nuclear power plants in recent years. In June 2011, unusually high
water on the Missouri River, caused by a combination of heavy spring
rains and Rocky Mountain snowmelt, inundated the Fort Calhoun plant
in Nebraska. And in October 2012, flooding from Hurricane Sandy
caused two New Jersey nuclear plants, Salem and Oyster Creek, to shut
down when high water levels threatened their water intake and
circulation systems.
Floods
caused by dam failures
Not
all floods that threaten nuclear reactors have natural causes,
however. Many nuclear plants are situated near rivers, and some of
them are downstream from a dam. When the dam fails, the resulting
flood is sudden and can be catastrophic. Unlike river overflows or
hurricanes, dam failures are likely to occur with little or no
advance warning, leaving plant operators scrambling to protect their
facilities before the floodwaters arrive, typically within hours.
So
far, dam failures have not affected any U.S. nuclear power plants.
But in July 2011 we learned that we may been luckier than we knew, as
the NRC released a report stating that previous estimates of flood
risk for many reactors were based on outdated information and would
need to be revised upward.
As
the 2011 NRC report points out, dam failures are far from rare; there
have been more than 700 of them in the U.S. since 1975. The NRC has
estimated the likelihood of failure at one particular dam—the
Jocassee dam, which lies a few miles upstream of the Oconee Nuclear
Station in South Carolina—at approximately 1 in 180 over the 20
years remaining on its license to operate.
While
1 in 180 may sound like a reasonably low probability, it is high
enough to require corrective action according to NRC standards. And
when we consider that 34 nuclear plants lie downstream from more than
50 dams, the cumulative likelihood of at least one plant being
affected by a dam failure is too high to ignore—especially since
these risk estimates do not account for the impacts of earthquakes or
the possibility of sabotage.
The
NRC's responsibility
Almost
as worrisome as the threat of dam failure itself is the fact that the
NRC apparently was aware of the increased risk for years before
addressing it—and passages indicating this were blacked out in the
2011 report on its original release, according to an NRC engineer,
Richard Perkins, who contacted the agency's Inspector General in
September 2012. The NRC had claimed that the redactions were
necessary for security reasons, but Perkins asserted that the
agency's real motive was to avoid embarrassment.
The
NRC should fulfill its responsibility to the public and act to ensure
that the threat of flood risk is adequately addressed at our nation's
nuclear plants.
Nuclear Plants at Increased Flood Risk from Dam Failure
The
following 34 U.S. nuclear plants were identified in the NRC's 2011
report as being at heightened risk of flood damage due to upstream
dam failures.
For
more information on these and other U.S. commercial nuclear reactors,
visit the Nuclear
Power Information Tracker.
Alabama
Browns
Ferry,
Units 1, 2, 3
Arkansas
Arkansas
Nuclear,
Units 1, 2
Louisiana
Waterford,
Unit 3
Minnesota
Prairie
Island,
Units 1, 2
Nebraska
New
Jersey
Hope
Creek,
Unit 1
Salem, Units 1, 2
Salem, Units 1, 2
New
York
Indian
Point,
Units 2, 3
North
Carolina
McGuire,
Units 1, 2
Pennsylvania
Beaver
Valley,
Units 1, 2
Peach Bottom, Units 2, 3
Three Mile Island, Unit 1
Peach Bottom, Units 2, 3
Three Mile Island, Unit 1
Tennessee
Texas
South
Texas,
Units 1, 2
South
Carolina
H.B.
Robinson,
Unit 2
Oconee, Units 1, 2, 3
Oconee, Units 1, 2, 3
Vermont
Virginia
Surry,
Units 1, 2
Washington
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.