Fiddling while the planet burns – that’s all they’ve ever done.
As World Burns, Richest Nations Can't Decide When to End Fossil Fuel Handouts
Despite
ambitious pledges, global energy ministers could not agree on a
target date to phase out billions in subsidies to dirty energy
"The
world is in a deep hole with climate change, and the first thing to
do in a hole is stop digging," said Stephen Kretzmann of Oil
Change International. (Photo: ribarnica/flickr/cc)
1
July, 2016
The
world's richest nations have failed to agree on a deadline to phase
out fossil fuels subsidies—a commitment energy ministers made in
2009—stirring new fears over the impact of the hundreds of billions
of taxpayer dollars that go toward keeping dirty energy afloat every
year.
Energy
ministers from the Group of 20 (G20) met in Beijing on Wednesday and
Thursday to discuss bringing those subsidies to a close after the
Group of 7 (G7), the world's seven wealthiest economies, last month
committed to eliminate "inefficient" fossil fuel handouts
by 2025. A report published
in 2015 by the climate group Oil Change International found that the
combined G20 subsidies for oil, gas, and coal production amounts to
roughly $444 billion a year.
But
despite ambitious pledges during the COP21 summit in Paris last year
and long-term campaigning from climate groups, who urged an even
earlier phase-out deadline of 2020, officials could not agree on a
target date.
According
to the
state-run Chinese news agency Xinhua,
as the two-day meeting wrapped up without a firm plan in place,
ministers released a communique and three other draft plans that
reportedly "encouraged" G20 members to "formulate
development strategies and action plans to boost renewable energy
investment and consumption."
The
G20 were also asked to "hold dialogues on emergencies in this
field, guard against market disruptions and promote energy safety."
"G20
countries talked big in Paris about their commitment to fighting
climate change, but when it comes to the basic task of stopping
public support for climate changing fossil fuels, they can't seem to
take the first steps, much less walk the walk," said Stephen
Kretzmann, executive director at Oil Change International.
"The
world is in a deep hole with climate change, and the first thing to
do in a hole is stop digging," Kretzmann said. "If world
leaders want to show that they’re committed to the kind of bold
climate action they agreed to in Paris, the least they can do is
commit to ending fossil fuel subsidies by 2020."
U.S.
Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz told reporters in Beijing that a
communique drafted by the ministers "repeats the importance of
moving towards a subsidy reduction. But within the G-20 there are
different views on how fast and how aggressive one can be on that."
He
added that in the U.S., "we'd like to see very substantial
progress" by 2025 or 2030. The G7, which includes the
U.S., agreed to
phase out fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 in May—though, as Overseas
Development Institute research fellow Shelagh Whitley said at the
time, "we could easily get there twice as fast."
Li
Shuo, a climate campaigner at Greenpeace, told the Washington
Post on
Thursday, "We think that it is critical that the G-20 follows
this approach and the timeline should be even earlier."
This
week's meeting was a lead-up to another G20 summit in September to
take place in Hangzhou.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.