Just the fact that this is being agreed upon by conservative scientists means that this picture is already hopelessly optimistic.
We’ve missed the boat on Climate Change
We’ve
had a chance to curb climate change. But we’ve blown
it.
2
July, 2016
So
say researchers at the International Institute for Applied Systems
Analysis in Austria, who have looked more closely at the pledges made
by individual countries at last December’s climate conference in
Paris to reduce their carbon emissions. Those pledges, they say, are
bound to lead to a global temperature rise of between 2.6°C and
3.1°C by the end of the century. “In fact,” they point out,
based on the findings of a new study, “the entire carbon budget for
limiting warming to below 2°C might have been emitted by 2030.”
The
Paris Agreement is meant to limit warming to below 1.5°C (or 2°C at
most) above pre-industrial levels, but we have already missed the
boat on that. “[The agreement] puts in place a flexible framework
for a long-term transformation towards a low-carbon society,” said
Joeri Rogelj, a researcher at the institute. “But our analysis
shows that these measures need to be strengthened in order to have a
good chance of keeping warming to well below 2°C, let alone 1.5°C.”
By
overshooting the 2°C mark, we are risking many of the most
destructive effects of global climate change worldwide: prolonged
droughts, intense storms, rising sea levels, extended heat waves.
Even a relatively moderate increase of 1.5°C in global temperatures
could spell disaster for several countries, such as small island
nations at the forefront of rising sea waters. An increase of twice
that or more will spell disaster for many more.
Owing
to the large number of variables and unknowns, current climate models
cannot accurately predict all the adverse impacts of global warming
in decades to come. Yet all indicators point in the direction of
cataclysmic environmental upheaval. A rise of 3°C in temperatures
would increase sea levels by around 6 meters, thereby inundating vast
areas of low-lying areas in countries like Malaysia.
Is
all lost then? Not necessarily. But all nations worldwide will need
to do a lot more to reduce their carbon emissions in coming years and
decades. “To go the rest of the way, we would need to assume much
more stringent action after 2030, which leads to emissions reductions
of about 3-4% per year globally,” stressed Niklas Höhne, a
researcher at the New Climate Institute in Germany. “But in
practice, switching to such stringent reductions right after 2030
would be challenging and require time. That means that in order to
ensure a chance of meeting these targets, we need significant further
action from countries before 2030.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.