This is a video made by Margo's Healing Spot discussing a recent peer-reviewed paper on geoengineering.
Here is my own initial assessement
A scientific paper, Fifty Years after “How to Wreck the Environment”:
Anthropogenic Extinction of Life on Earth has been made available to me that discusses what the authors describe as a top-secret international military agreement to alter not only the weather (through cloud-seeding) but the climate (by seeding particulates in the atmosphere with aluminium, barium etc etc.
The article is published by the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International. The authors are J. Marvin Herndo, Mark Whiteside and Ian Baldwin who do not appear to be university academics and the editors appear to come from counries such as Cameroon and Bangladesh.
It is not so much a scientific paper as areview of “the interdisciplinary, historical, scientific and medical literature” and contains a history of peer review HERE
The first objection of sceptics is that it is not a real "scientific paper" coming from an "approved" academic institution in an "approved" country (such as the United States). This raises the history of Prof. Tim Garrett's paper on civilisation as aheat engine which was refused for publication by numerous scientific journals. Of course if is not published one can say loudly, "it is not peer-reviewed” - and therefore not acceptable.
It seems to me that the journal is bona fide and the authors have followed all the right procedures.
The paper takes an essay, “How to Wreck the Environment” written by Gordon J. F. MacDonald (1929 - 2002) that appeared in a book edited by British science writer, Nigel Calder, Unless Peace Comes that was published in 1968.
It reviews his article and brings the information up-to-date.
MacDonald was the real deal - not some sort of conspiracy theorist.
He was a American geophysicist and environmental scientist and a prominent early scientific advocate of action to address the threat of global warming from fossil-fuel combustion
He appeared in a1980 testimony to Congress where he warned that the climate changes due to a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would "probably have a profound effect on agriculture, on all aspects of energy use and generation, and on water and land use." "The dilemma we face is of historic proportions,"
In his article he stated:
“Our present primitive understanding of deliberate environmental change makes it difficult to imagine a world in which geophysical warfare is practised. Such a world might be one in which nuclear weapons were effectively banned and the weapons of mass destruction were those of environmental catastrophe. “
This is how the paper introduces things:
“MacDonald discussed overt and covert weather warfare based upon seeding clouds to cause rainfall. Subsequently, a method was developed for inhibiting rainfall by jet-emplacing pollution particulates where clouds form. For at least two decades citizens have observed such particulate trails occurring with increasing frequency. Forensic scientific investigations implicate toxic coal fly ash as their main constituent. Around 2010, the aerial particulate spraying ramped-up to a near-daily, near-global level. Presumably, a secret international agreement mandated the aerial spraying as a ‘sunshade’ for Earth. However, aerial spraying, rather than cooling, heats the atmosphere, retards Earth’s heat loss, and causes global warming. MacDonald also discussed destroying atmospheric ozone and triggering earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, activities now possible with high-frequency ionospheric heaters.
“The politically powerful geoscientist Gordon J. F. MacDonald (1929-2002) wrote an influential essay titled, “How to Wreck the Environment,” that was published in 1968 in a book called Unless Peace Comes . At a time when the military’s focus centered on nuclear warfare, MacDonald prophetically suggested: “Among future means of obtaining national objectives by force, one possibility hinges on man’s ability to control and manipulate the environment of his planet.” MacDonald, a top presidential science advisor and participant in national science-policy discussions, was well qualified to address the subject of future environmental warfare possibilities.
Much of what MacDonald predicted or speculated about has come to pass, not with the technology he described, but with potentially far more effective and devastating technology developed during the succeeding fifty years.”
The paper starts of with a discussion of weather modification which they equate with cloud-seeding that was discussed by MacDonald in his essay.
“Weather modification is a phenomenon limited in duration and geographical extent, whereas climate modification is necessarily global”
This6 is equivalent to a world-wide project of aerial spraying that they identify as having taken off in approximately 2010 which is when observant people started to notice an uptick in activity. The authors contend this is “presumably based on a secret international agreement
In common with others who talk about geoengineering they cotend that this is an existing program rather than a theoretical option which has not yet been put into effect:
"The U. S. military has been engaged for decades in aerial spraying of particulates into the regions where clouds form to modify weather and for other reasons, such as to enhance communication systems associated with electromagnetic radiation programs."
The authors state that if there was a secret agreement the presumption would be that it was benefiting mankind. However.its implementation is “exacerbating the problem of global warming and causing climate chaos,and adversely affecting the health of organisms, including humans”
The authors speculate that an agreement may have been sold on the grounds that geoengineering was going to cool the planet whereas they say t has done the opposite: it has further warmed the planet.
“If so, they have been conned into the greatest “science-based” scam ever perpetrated : Cause global warming and climate chaos by daily aerial spraying and then blame the warming result on anthropogenic greenhouse gases to undermine the authority of nation states, and erect new world governance structures to regulate anthropogenic,transnational greenhouse gas emissions”
One of the stronger bits of evidence for “chemtrails” has been the discovery of large amounts of toxic aluminium and barium. The consituents of spraying had long been kept secret but observant people concenred by the changes of what they saw in the sky took samples of post -spraying rainwater and had
them analyzed at commercial laboratories.
Very high levels of aluminium, barium etc. were identified in the tests. It was also found that aerosolized particulates are consistent with coal fly ash that comes from the incomplate combustion of coal.
"Coal fly ash, when exposed to moisture or body fluids, releases numerous toxins, including aluminum in a chemically mobile form, which is an environmentally and biologically unnaturalstate. Chemically mobile aluminum is deadly to plants and trees as well as to amphibians. Aluminum is associated with neurological disorders , and has been found in high levels in bees"
Usually, particulates are talked about in connection with the aerosol masking effect; aerosols act as an “umbrella” which prevents heat from reaching the surface of Earth (‘global dimming’).
However, in contradiction to the conventional wisdom the authors contend that, rather than cool the Earth they warm it:
“Strongly light-absorbing aerosols, such as CFA, directly heat the
atmosphereand indirectly reduce snow albedo by their warming effect As the aerosolized particulates fall to Earth, especially in far northern and far southern regions, they change the albedo of the ice/snow, which allows more solar energy to be absorbed by Earth . This behavior, especially when considered in the context of near-daily, near-global aerosol spraying clearly may contribute to global warming. Consequently, the thermal state of Earth is biased toward warming, the exact opposite of official claims for geoengineering”
In common with Dane Wigington the authors of the paper contend that the ozone layer is not healing – in fact There is “new evidence for the continuous loss of ozone in the lower stratosphere”
“Previously, depletion of lower stratospheric ozone has been attributed to rapidly increasing anthropogenic (and some natural) short-lived substances that contain chlorine or bromine . However, the aerosolized CFA used for climate modification, now conducted on a near-daily, near-global basis, places massive quantities of chlorine, bromine, fluorine, and iodine into the atmosphere, including highly reactive nano-particulates. These are potential destroyers of ozone”
In addition to the chemical destruction of stratospheric ozone, there are indications that high-frequency ionospheric heaters (equivalent to, but not restricted to HAARP), now dispersed globally, may adversely affect stratospheric ozone
In this regard they point to Russian research that “disovered a new physical phenomenon of the decrease of the intensity of microwave emission from the mesosphere in the ozone line upon the modification of the ionosphere with high-power high-frequency (HF) radio waves”
Fifty years ago MacDonald noted: “The enhanced low-frequency electrical oscillations in the earth-ionosphere cavity relate to possible weapons systems through the little understood aspect of brain-physiology....No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantage is to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades.”
With ionospheric heater transmitters scattered throughout the world, that time might be close at hand half a century after MacDonald’s forecast.
The authors talk about the great extinctions and how the Permian extinction 250 million years ago resulted in one of the world’s largest petroleum and gas deposits
The relationship between major petroleum and natural gas production wells and the boundary of the Siberian Traps, indicated by the black line. Methane hydrate deposits currently locked in the permafrost within this extensive area upon melting pose a major catastrophe
- Herndon JM. New concept on the origin of petroleum and natural gas deposits. JPetrol Explor Prod Technol 2017;7(2):345 -52.
The authors contend that Anthropogenic “global warming, caused by the near-daily, near-global aerial particulate spraying, poses a serious risk
of massively thawing and releasing that entrapped methane to tthe atmosphere. The potential for another mass-extinction event, should this happen, cannot be dismissed”
Here is the authors’ conclusion:
"The decision to alter the natural workings of our planet, to pollute the air we breathe, to disrupt natural climate, to weaponize natural geophysical processes, to disrupt the ionosphere that protects us from the sun’s deadly electromagnetic radiation, and to mislead the public about the health risks involved was accurately forecasted in 1968 by Gordon J. F. MacDonald in his essay aptly entitled “How to Wreck the Environment.” But MacDonald’s vision was not 20/20. He imagined that a nation would be able to develop military technology for the benefit of its own natural national interests, but failed to see the evolution of a planetary“enemy” and the resultant pressures on nation states’ militaries to act in planetary concert against this so
"MacDonald also failed to fully appreciate the negative impacts of the future environmental warfare technologies, including their impact on human and environmental health. Ninety percent (90%) of the world’s population now lives in areas with unhealthy air. Coal-combustion products are the most important single contributor to this global air pollution, with exposure to the PM2.5particles that characterize coal fly ash the leading environmental risk factor for all such deaths (4.5 million in 2015) . Air pollution disproportionately affects the young and the old and those with chronic illness.
"War trumps all humanity’s other organized activities. It involves not only life -and-death secrecy protocols but distorts the openness of scientific discovery . The secret war on climate change is no exception to this rule. MacDonald did not realize half a century ago that the world’s militaries could be co-opted by a secret international agreement to wage a first-ever war on the planetary Earth system, on all Earth’s biota and fundamental biogeochemical processes-called enemy –climate change."
A lot of the above goes right against the grain of conventional climate science and verges on climate change denial.
That, however, has never been an arguments to me.I am deeply opposed to reductionistic thinking and that things cannot be one thing AND another. This, to me is clearly not the case.
What has pesuaded me this year to rethink my position is the appearance in our New Zealand skies of absolutely bizarre cloud-cover, not on an occasional basis but every day. Wheras previously our skies looked like a vibrant oil painting now they look more like skies all round the world – wore akin to a washed out water colouring painting.
In parallel with this just looking at the Arctic on NASA Worldview every day my friend,Margo, and I noticed some very strange phenomena and suspected that NASA were removing inconvenient data, usually the next day.
Unless one is taking screenshots of everything every step of the way it is hard to prove this.
However, proof came from this paper in the form of a NASA Worldview satellite image from February 4, 2016 showing jet-laid particulate trails blanketing the air above the Republic of Cyprus but nearly absent in surrounding regions.
I decided to check for myself the veracity of this image and went to NASA Worldview and found the data for the exact same day – all the jet-laid particulate trails had been removed and replaced by blue sky!
One’s own prejudices and belief systems will probably determine how one relates to this informaton.
If you think that 9/11 was carried out with a group of Saudis with box cutters and that prior to Donald Trump coming to power America was the policeman of the world, and that the IPCC is the fount of all knowledge on climate change you are highly unlikely to accept a single word of this.
If, however, you are open to looking at new evidence and don’t have such a rose-tinted spectacle view of the world you might just come to the conclusion that higher life forms on planet Earth are threat from human-induced climate change as well as a program to engineer both the weather and the climate.
With the unleashing of a large quantity of positive feedbacks and trigger points it beoomes somewhat of an intellectual exercise as to what the initial causes of planetary warming are – greenhouse gases released by the industrial heat engine or of geoengineering.
I am willing to wager that there are two things at play here. In addition to what we call climate change (and I call abrupt climate change) there is an ill-thought out program to filter out the sunlight and thereby cool the planet.
Whenever this happens, either through the cessation or near-cessation of industrial activity or through the cessation of spraying our skies with particulates laden with heavy metals, we are going to see rapid warming that will lead to a cascade of catastrophic events culminating in the extinction of our favourite species
Unless Peace Comes
A Scientific Forecast of New Weapons
July 22, 1968 - Viking Adult - ISBN: 978 067 074 1140 edited by Nigel Calder
With its telling and dispassionate prose and with its life-or-death message, this remarkable and urgently important book should and must chill the hearts and sober the thoughts of anyone who reads it. Nigel Calder is a widely known and respected English science writer and editor. For many years he edited London's New Scientist, which achieved a reputation and influence far beyond its circulation. In this volume he has marshaled the services of sixteen eminent scientists from six countries and asked them from the vantage points of their own disciplines to set down their projections of warfare in the future. No layman who reads this will ever be likely again to characterize the whole scientific community as either oblivious or uncaring. As the French authors of the chapter on chemical warfare put it, "The question may arise: is all science damned? We must either eliminate science or eliminate war. We cannot have both." There is undeniably a chilling fascination in these glimpses into the future— at robot centipede tanks fused with H-bombs; at nerve gases; at refined missiles and submarines; at bacterial weapons; at the fatal fallacies built into atomic deterrence; at the possibilities of tampering with nature itself; at all the political, scientific, and military nightmares which mankind is striving to make real. Yet there is no danger that any reader will for a moment lose sight of the fact that Unless Peace Comes is not an extrapolative catalogue of the gadgetry of warfare but an awesome underlining of the hugest moral imperative in the history of mankind.
Chapter from 'Unless Peace Comes'
HOW TO WRECK THE ENVIRONMENT