Obedience
at home
Guy
McPherson
9
June, 2013
As
if he could peer into the future, American author Henry David Thoreau
is credited with the expression: “Disobedience is the true
foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.”
I’ve
written and spoken often about the requirements for maintaining an
empire, particularly an empire in decline: obedience at home,
oppression abroad, and wholesale destruction of the living planet.
I’ve written numerous essays about the latter two phenomena.
Although I’ve spoken about a few examples concerning obedience at
home, I’ve not focused on the topic with a single essay. Ergo, this
essay.
Herein
I present a few recent examples of oppression abroad. This essay is
hardly comprehensive, and the hits keep coming. But it’s a minor
start to a major issue. I’m certain many more examples will appear
— though not to the typical,
purposely ignorant American —
until American Empire finally sinks to the bottom of the cesspool in
which it is mired.
I
focus on the Obama administration because it is the most recent and
also the most horrific example of imperialism. I refuse to play the
game currently popular among Democrats in which Obama is compared to
Mitt Romney or John McCain. Obama has a record as president, and
Romney and McCain don’t. I cannot imagine a worst president than
Obama, although that’s what I thought about his predecessor, too.
I’m hardly the only person to refer to Obama
as the worst president ever.
Full disclosure: When I was registered to vote, I was a lifelong
Democrat.
When
he was in the Oval Office, I thought Ronald Reagan was the worst
president ever. But I still recall thinking, when Reagan was shot,
that it could be worse: We could have his vice president, ex-director
of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) George Herbert Walker Bush,
as president. A few day less than eight years later, we did. Then
along comes Slick Willy, who slyly managed to outflank his
predecessor and the opposing party on several significant issues. In
every case, Bill Clinton outflanked the opposition by moving further
to the political right. Just when I thought it couldn’t get any
worse, George W. Bush was selected. Twice. And then, he was replaced
by somebody even worse. In my voting lifetime, each neo-conservative
U.S. president has been replaced by a worse version. And lest you
believe otherwise, our two-party, one-ideology system of governance
is working. It’s not working for us, but that’s never been the
plan.
Within
my lifetime, Democrats have shifted far to the right, thus coopting
the ideas of the Grand Old Party. The latter
party is effectively gone,
serving only to make the Democrats seem sane by comparison. Obama and
the Democrats can get away with every imaginable abuse — and many
abuses I could not have imagined until they occurred — simply by
using the Republicans as cover. The corporate media are fully engaged
in the cover-up, as pointed
out in the 21 March 2013 issue ofHarper’s
magazine:
“Barack Obama … never stops serving the ruling class, yet the
mainstream media, from right to left, continues to pretend that he’s
some sort of reincarnation of Franklin D. Roosevelt, fully committed
to the downtrodden and deeply hostile to the privileged and the
rich.”
Obama’s
corporate government is a doing the bidding of the corporations. The
corporate media aids and abets the enemies of the people. As Noam
Chomsky points out, “any dictator would admire the uniformity and
obedience of the U.S. media.” The American people, fully convinced
they are consumers instead of citizens, capitulate to their masters.
The unseen bars keep the people enslaved.
Obama
seeks cradle-to-grave
power to rule over Americans,
with examples that are breathtaking in their number and scope. He is
responsible for torture, according
to two-year independent investigation by the Constitution
Project released
16 April 2013 (see here).
Obama’s Department of Justice has brought charges against six
whistleblowers under the Espionage Act of 1917, a number
that exceeds every previous administration combined.
Indeed, he destroys whistle-blowers with a hateful vengeance, with
a recent
example focusing on a man who tried to reduce government waste.
His vision of this country is termed Obama’s
wiretap America in
the 8 May 2013 issue of Salon,
although it’s merely an extension of policies in place since at
least 2001, according to an 11
May 2006 story in USA
Today.
Even before then, the National
Security Agency (NSA) had a back door built into Windows software.
Obama’s government gives AT&T
and other telecommunications companies secret immunity from wiretap
laws.
In fact, officials in his administration have authorized
a new government program involving the interception of communications
on Internet service providers,
as well as to record
every single telephone conversation (as reported
in the Guardian as
recently at 6 June 2013).
The same day, the Washington
Post reports that
one of George W. Bush’s legacies, continued by Obama, is a
collaboration between U.S. spy agencies and Microsoft, Yahoo, Google,
Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, and Apple. Oh, and
Obama’s Internal
Revenue Service could be reading your email without a warrant.
These invasions of privacy in name of security — an
overview of the “best” articles on this worst of horrors is
offered by ProPublica —
are merely warm-up acts for the massive National Security Agency data
collection and analysis centerunder
construction in Utah which,
according to a former NSA official, puts us very near “a turnkey
totalitarian state.”
All
of this probably is fine with most Americans. It’s been a long,
relatively gradual road to
this point. Most American citizens favor imprisoning terrorist
suspects even without evidence to convict,according
to a Rasmussen poll conducted in April 2013.
And we’re busily looking the other way as the NSA
uses a bogus, secret interpretation of the Patriot Act to get away
with recording millions of telephone calls and retaining every email
message for an indeterminate length of time.
Fortunately for them and all of us law-abiding citizens, Obama
refuses to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay — yet another in an
endless string of broken campaign promises — and instead has
approved major upgrades.
And,
lest we ever forget, I’m here to remind you what George W. Bush and
his cabal of evil-doers proclaimed: Those terrorists hate us for our
freedoms.
Many
people more informed than I have argued that the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA) is running the show, and has been doing so at least as
far back as 22 November 1963. One needn’t get into the big picture
to point out that the CIA’s
mission, with respect to data, is “collect everything and hang onto
it forever.”
The CIA
admits to using broadcast news to manipulate the American citizenry
as far back as 1954.
The good-guy/bad-guy story of Al
Qaeda is a classic example of an organization founded by the CIA in
1998,
and then demonized by the CIA and other government entities.
Rather
than the CIA running the show, maybe the big
banks have been in charge, at least since the 1990s.
According to the 29 December 2012 issue of the Guardian,
the brutal
crackdown on Occupy was coordinated by the big banks.
Indeed, a compelling case can be made that JP Morgan Chase runs the
whole show, since the Federal
Reserve Bank and JP Morgan Chase appear to be the same entity.
Rather
than the CIA or the big banks running the show, maybe it’s the
tyranny of oligarchy. Consider the revolving doors between the
federal government and corporations. A recent
example has
former CIA head and four-star Army General David Petraeus joining
buyout firm KKR & Co. L.P. (formerly known as Kohlberg Kravis
Roberts & Co.), one of the world’s largest private equity
firms.
Not
surprisingly, the corporate media is barely making a peep as Obama’s
corporate government continues to practice socialism for the rich and
capitalism for the poor. Why do you think a
homeless man gets a 15-year sentence for stealing a few dollars
whereas a CEO receives a 3-year sentence for stealing $3 billion? Why
do you think local
police officers work for Exxon after a spill? Why
do you think the Fifth
Amendment no longer exists as a functioning law of the land?
Obama’s
corporate government flaunts the illegal acquisition of information
as he launches a war on journalism, according to recent reporting
by the
Guardian and Slate.
Too little, too late, the corporate
media express outrage long after they acquiesed to fascism.
A recent example is the New
York Times calling
for the citizenry to trust the official government story on the
Boston bombing or be proclaimed insane.
Contrary
to popular belief in the neoconservative blogosphere, Obama is not
coming for your guns. The federal government has way more artillery
than the citizenry could possibly muster, and it is no
longer able to cover up huge purchases of ammunition.
Writing for the 11 April 2013 issue ofGuardian, Glenn
Greenwald exposes Obama’s lies about drones:
(1) The Obama administration often has no idea who they are killing;
(2) Whisteblowers are vital for transparency and accountability,
which is precisely why the Obama administration is waging a war on
them; and (3) Secrecy ensures both government lies and abuses of
power. A month after Glennwald’s piece appeared, Obama
finally admits
his drones killed four Americans.
That’s why Obama and his government don’t care about your guns:
They have more firepower than you.
The
feds don’t need your guns, but they’re broke, so they need your
money. Already, a confiscation
scheme is planned for the United Kingdom and the U.S. Unfortunately
for the government, it’s getting a little late to extract fiat
currency from most Americans. In a closely related issue, the
ccriminalization
of political dissent is complete in America.
It’s
difficult for me to imagine a more passive citizenry than the current
state of American Empire. Surely Thoreau would be stunned.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.