Pentagon to present its own plan of ‘effective war on terror’ in Syria – without Russia
RT,
8
September, 2018
Washington
has its own plan on how to “effectively” combat terrorism in
Syria, the Pentagon has said, adding that the US is not planning to
cooperate with Moscow on the issue.
The
US military strategists have found what they call a “better, more
focused way” to do counterterrorism operations in Idlib, the US
Department of Defense said in statement on Saturday. The US military
revealed almost no details of its plan as the statement said only
that it would involve “using the US capabilities to spot the
terrorists – even in an urban environment – and take them out
with a minimum of civilian casualties.”
Washington
also apparently plans to go at it alone, without working with other
actors present in the area as the head of the US Joint Chiefs of
Staff, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford, “was not talking about
cooperating,” the statement added. He also said that he had not
spoken with his Russian counterpart, Army General Valery Gerasimov,
since the tensions around the Syrian northern militant-held Idlib
province began to rise, adding that the two military officials are
also “not scheduled” to talk in the near future.
Instead,
the US military once again warned against a government offensive on
the province, which is largely controlled by extremists, including
the Al Qaeda affiliate known as Tahrir al-Sham (former Al Nusra
Front), which it claimed would lead to a “humanitarian
disaster.”“The consequences of a major offensive operation in
Idlib will almost certainly be the suffering of a large number of
innocent civilians,” Dunford told journalists.
The
head of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff also slammed the results of the
summit between the leaders of Russia, Turkey and Iran on Syria, which
was recently held in Tehran, by saying that the “meeting …
failed” without going into further details.
Turkey’s
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Iran’s Hassan
Rouhani discussed the situation in Syria and in the Idlib province in
particular as part of the Astana peace process on Friday. All three
nations agree that the threat of radical Islamists in Syria must be
eliminated, but differed as to how this should be achieved.
While
Iran advocated a strong-arm approach, Turkey objected to such an idea
as it feared that a large-scale military operation could provoke a
mass exodus of refugees to the neighboring Turkish regions.
Eventually, a call for all armed groups in Idlib to lay down arms and
seek a political transition was included in the final communique of
the meeting. Both Turkey and Iran were, however, critical of the US
presence in Syria.
Ankara
was also persistent in its opposition to any potential offensive
against extremists in Idlib. Turkey plans to stop any “anticipated
attacks” on the militant-held province, Foreign Minister Mevlut
Cavusoglu said on Saturday, warning that any operation in Idlib could
possibly lead to a “serious humanitarian tragedy.”
“Our
aim is to stop airstrikes [in Syria’s Idlib]. We were anticipating
attacks, which could have happened,” Cavusoglu said, adding that
the clashes in the province “should stop” and the whole issue
should be “resolved in line with the agreement and the spirit of
Astana.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.