Why
did the Paris Agreement not specify a year for preindustrial?
Remember
the Paris Agreement, when politicians pledged to take efforts to
ensure that the temperature would not cross 1.5°C above
preindustrial?
Why
did the Paris Agreement not specify a year for preindustrial? Perhaps
the idea was that total anthropogenic global warming should not
exceed 1.5°C. In other words, the warming that people had already
caused by 1750, plus the warming people caused since 1750, plus the
warming that is already baked in for the decades to come.
The image illustrates this idea and also shows that we're well above 1.5°C anthropogenic global warming.
From the post 'Will August 2018 be the hottest month on record?', at: https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2018/08/will-august-2018-be-the-hottest-month-on-record.html
The image illustrates this idea and also shows that we're well above 1.5°C anthropogenic global warming.
From the post 'Will August 2018 be the hottest month on record?', at: https://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2018/08/will-august-2018-be-the-hottest-month-on-record.html
In
the early days of the Industrial Revolution, no one would have
thought that their burning of fossil fuels would have an almost
immediate effect on the climate. But our new study, published
today in Nature,
reveals that warming in some regions actually began as early as the
1830s.
That
is much earlier than previously thought, so our discovery redefines
our understanding of when human activity began to influence our
climate.
Determining
when global warming began, and how quickly the planet has warmed
since then, is essential for understanding how much we have altered
the climate in different parts of the world. Our study helps to
answer the question of whether our climate is already operating
outside thresholds that are considered safe for human society and
functional ecosystems.
Our
findings show that warming did not develop at the same time across
the planet. The tropical oceans and the Arctic were the first regions
to begin warming, in the 1830s. Europe, North America and Asia
followed roughly two decades later.
Surprisingly,
the results show that the southern hemisphere began warming much
later, with Australasia and South America starting to warm from the
early 20th century. This continental-scale time lag is still evident
today: while some parts of Antarctica have begun to warm, a clear
warming signal over the entire continent is still not detectable.
The
warming in most regions reversed what would otherwise have been a
cooling trend related to high volcanic activity during the preceding
centuries.
Global
warming got underway much earlier in the north.
By
pinpointing the date when human-induced climate change started, we
can then begin to work out when the warming trend broke through the
boundaries of the climate’s natural fluctuations, because it takes
some decades for the global warming signal to “emerge” above the
natural climate variability.
According
to our evidence, in all regions except for Antarctica, we are now
well and truly operating in a greenhouse-influenced world. We know
this because the only climate models that can reproduce the results
seen in our records of past climate are those models that factor in
the effect of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere by
humans.
These
remarkable findings were pieced together from the most unusual of
sources – not thermometers or satellites, but rather from natural
climate archives. These include coral skeletons, ice cores, tree
rings, cave deposits and ocean and lake sediment layers, all of which
record the climate as they grow or accumulate.
These
archives provide long records that extend back 500 years – well
before the Industrial Revolution – and provide a critical baseline
for the planet’s past climate, one that is impossible to obtain
otherwise.
class="caption"
style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px;
font-size: 11px; vertical-align: baseline; background:
transparent;"Corals can
help reveal the climate of centuries past, long before weather
records began. Eric
Matson/AIMS, Author provided
But
why is there no clear warming fingerprint yet seen across Antarctica?
The answer most likely lies in the vast Southern Ocean, which
isolates the frozen continent from the warming happening elsewhere.
The
westerly winds that circulate through the Southern Ocean around
Antarctica keep warm air masses from lower latitudes at bay. Ozone
depletion and rising greenhouse gas concentrations during the 20th
century have also caused this wind barrier to get stronger.
The
Southern Ocean currents that flow around Antarctica also tend to move
warmer surface waters away from the continent,
to be replaced with cold deeper water that hasn’t yet been affected
by surface greenhouse warming. This process could potentially delay
Antarctica’s warming by centuries.
Ocean insulation
The
delay in warming observed in the rest of the southern hemisphere is
something we do not yet fully understand. It could simply be because
fewer records are available from the southern hemisphere, meaning
that we still don’t have a full picture of what is happening.
Alternatively,
like Antarctica, the southern hemisphere’s oceans could be holding
back warming – partly through winds and currents, but perhaps also
because of “thermal inertia”, whereby the ocean can absorb far
more heat energy than the atmosphere or the land before its
temperature markedly increases. Bear in mind that the southern half
of the globe has much more ocean than the north.
Essentially,
then, the coolness of the southern hemisphere’s vast oceans could
be “insulating” Australasia and South America from the impact of
global warming. The question is, for how long?
If
our evidence of delayed warming in the southern hemisphere holds
true, it could mean we are in in for more climate surprises as global
warming begins to overcome the thermal inertia of our surrounding
oceans. Could the recent
record warming of Australian waters,
and the subsequent
damage to the Great Barrier Reef,
be an early sign that this is already occurring?
Recent
research suggest that the mass bleaching event of the reef was
made 175
times more likely by climate change.
Following the recent severity of such extremes, a better
understanding of how anthropogenic greenhouse warming is already
impacting the southern hemisphere is critical.
What to do about it
Leading
scientists from around the world met
in Geneva last
week to discuss the goal of limiting average global warming to 1.5℃
– the more ambitious of the two targets enshrined in the Paris
climate agreement.
Last
year, global temperatures crossed the 1℃
threshold,
and 2016 is on
track to be 1.2-1.3℃ above our climate baseline.
But
here’s the kicker. That baseline is relative to 1850–1900, when
most of our thermometer-based temperature records began. What our
study shows is that for many parts of the world that estimate isn’t
good enough, because global warming was already under way, so the
real baseline would be lower.
The
small increases in greenhouse gases during the 19th century had a
small effect on Earth’s temperatures, but with the longer
perspective we get from our natural climate records we see that big
changes occurred. These fractions of a degree of extra warming might
seem insignificant at first, but as we nudge ever closer to the 1.5℃
guardrail (and potentially
beyond),
the past tells us that small
changes matter.
The
UN Paris Agreement on climate change aims to ensure increases in
global temperature are less than 2°C above ‘pre-industrial’
levels, with an aspirational 1.5°C limit. However, the ‘starting
line’ of the pre-industrial era is not defined by the UN
agreements, or by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC).
A new
analysis by
an international team of researchers aims to better define the
pre-industrial baseline, informing the world’s decision makers on
the required limits to greenhouse gas emissions needed to meet the
terms of the Paris agreement. The study concludes that 2015 was
likely the first time in recorded history that global temperatures
were more than 1°C above pre-industrial levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.