Iran
arrested ‘tens of spies’ within government – minister
28
August, 2018
Iranian
security forces have identified and arrested “tens of spies”
working in government agencies, according to Intelligence Minister
Mahmoud Alavi.
“The
intelligence ministry's anti-espionage unit has successfully
identified and arrested tens of spies in different governmental
bodies,”
Alavi was quoted by the news agency ISNA on Tuesday.
The
minister did not offer any details about the arrests or identities of
the alleged spies. He did say the ministry has been on the lookout
for dual nationals, however.
Security
forces arrested a member of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL)
militant group in southern Iran earlier this month, and broke up
a “terrorist
cell” in
the north of the country, Alavi said.
The
intelligence ministry has also foiled several bombing plots in metro
stations and universities, but had not previously disclosed it to the
public, said the minister.
Alavi’s
announcement comes as the US has reimposed sanctions on Tehran
following President Donald Trump’s unilateral withdrawal from the
2015 JCPOA nuclear deal. More sanctions are scheduled to take effect
in November, and the US has threatened to punish anyone in the world
who does business with Tehran.
Iran
has responded by unveiling new homemade weapons, including a fighter
jet and
a ballistic
missile,
as well as saying its navy is “vigilantly
controlling”
the Strait of Hormuz. Some 18.5 million barrels of crude oil transit
the strait every day, on the way from the Persian Gulf to the rest of
the world.
In
February, Iranian authorities arrested three environmental activists
in the southern province of Hormozgan, charging them with spying for
the CIA and the Israeli Mossad.
Earlier
this month, the US arrested and charged two Iranian nationals,
accusing them of spying on an orthodox Jewish center in Chicago and a
New York conference of the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK), a US-backed
exile group Iran considers a terrorist organization.
NOTE: This comes from western reports.
Fissures
Grow At Top Of Iran's Government As Rouhani Censured, Top Officials
Sacked
28
August, 2018
Iran's
parliament has censured President Hassan Rouhani, voting on Tuesday
to reject his explanations for why the country's economy is
crumbling.
Reuters reports this
came after Rouhani underwent a grilling in front of parliament on
live TV as hardliners gain the upper hand after crippling rounds of
US sanctions.
It's
but the latest sign of deep
fissures that run to the top of Iran's government after parliament
sacked the minister of economy and finance over the weekend.
This
followed the labor minister's sacking as well — both
were blamed for not staving off the collapse of the rial and surging
inflation.
Fighting
erupted over whether to oust the finance minister during a
parliamentary session in Tehran. Image source: EPA via LA Times
The
dismissal of the now former finance minister Masoud Karbasian is
unlikely to do anything positive to halt the downward spiral at
this late hour with the rial falling to new lows seemingly on a
weekly basis against the U.S. dollar.
The
rial fell this past weekend to 107,000 to the dollar,
while a year ago it was about 33,000 rials to $1.
It
signals an overall trend that conservatives and Islamists are
seizing the opportunity to gain momentum over moderates and
pragmatists amidst trying to survive economic war with the US.
“Over
the last year since you became the minister, the dinner table of the
people has shrunk to the point of invisibility,” conservative
lawmaker Hosseinali Hajideligani told the finance minister
during a contentious legislative
hearing over the weekend. “The
purchasing power of the people has dropped down at least by 50%. You
have made the people poorer every day."
Karbasian,
for his part, blamed the sanctions while implying there's nothing
that could have stopped the pressure from squeezing the entire
economy, saying America had “targeted our entire economy and social
fortifications.”
“America
is seeking to block the country's economic vessels to put people
under pressure and stir dissatisfaction,” the finance minister told
lawmakers. “They
are after hitting the government and ruling system. You should
believe that we are at an all-out economic war.”
But
in the end a narrow majority of 137 lawmakers in the 260-seat
parliament voted to boot Karbasian, suggesting that moderates who
joined in on lashing out at the chief administrative overseer of
economic policy may have tipped the scales against him.
One reformist
lawmaker, Elias Hazrati of Tehran charged: “What have we
done? What have we done to the Iranian people?” And questioned
further, “Why should the people suffer from this situation?
What is the people's fault?”
No
doubt, the White House welcomes these growing public divisions as
President Trump has now on multiple occasions credited increased
domestic turmoil in Iran with his pulling the US from the Iran
nuclear deal last May and reimposing aggressive sanctions targeting
major industries.
As
Reuters acknowledges, "The
action in parliament is a further sign of how the Trump
administration’s decision to re-impose sanctions could affect
Iran’s leadership and its relationship with the outside world,
potentially for decades to come."
And
yet, as a number of analysts predicted, the hard-nose approach will
likely raise the stature of the Islamic hardliners in Tehran, who
from the beginning preached that American duplicity, saying the US
would never honor the 2015 deal when Rouhani entered into it.
Iran’s rulers have been divided between a pragmatic faction that aims for better international relations, and hardliners who are wary of reforms. Trump’s decision to abandon the nuclear deal was opposed by U.S. allies in Europe, who argued that he undermined Rouhani and strengthened the hands of the hardliners.
Meanwhile
it appears there's likely more carnage within Tehran's leadership to
come: following the exit of both the finance and labor ministers this
month, Tasnim news agency reported that 70 lawmakers have
already moved to impeach a third: the Minister of Industry,
Mines and Business.
The
long-term ascendancy of the hard-line faction in Iran's government
is also likely to make it easier for hawks in Washington and Tel
Aviv to make a public case that the regime needs to be toppled.
Iran Asks UN Court to Lift US Sanctions, Argues Violation of 1955 Treaty
27
August, 2018
After previously
filing a lawsuit against the U.S. over the threat of new
sanctions, Iran asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on
Monday to lift new sanctions imposed in recent weeks.
The latest
developments on the case are available at the ICJ’s
website. The full transcript of today’s proceedings can be
found here.
An earlier
request by the tribunal to halt new sanctions was not
fulfilled by the U.S. State Department. In addition to new sanctions
on Iran, the U.S. also established a new ‘Iran
Action Group’ to coordinate all of its anti-Iran policies.
On July 25th, the ICJ issued “urgent communications” to the U.S. not to impose any new sanctions against Iran until the court could hear arguments and reach a verdict in the lawsuit filed by the Islamic Republic. (Photo: Tehran Times)
Iran
has filed a lawsuit at the International Court of Justice
(ICJ) seeking
a court order to lift US sanctions against them. The sanctions
were imposed in recent weeks as part of the US withdrawing from the
P5+1 nuclear deal, and subsequently trying to reimpose nuclear
sanctions on the Iranians.
Iran
argues that the unilateral sanctions are in violation of the 1955
Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations signed between Iran and the US
in 1955. The treaty has been cited in previous Iranian lawsuits
against the US at the ICJ.
This
is the first time, however, that Iran has pushed a lawsuit regarding
the treaty to prevent US sanctions. This may reflect that in the
past, US sanctions tended to be part of international measures, while
in this case, the US unilaterally withdrew from the existing
diplomatic deal, and seeks to reimpose sanctions unilaterally,
pushing the rest of the world to comply with them.
The
US hasn’t commented on the new lawsuit, though since previous
administrations have cited the 1955 treaty with Iran in other
contexts, so it will be difficult for the current administration to
claim that it isn’t still effectively in place.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.