UN Security Council unanimously adopts tougher sanctions on North Korea
RT,
11
September, 2017
The
United Nations Security Council has unanimously approved a new
resolution, banning North Korea’s textile exports and capping its
oil imports following Pyongyang’s sixth nuclear test conducted last
week.
The
UNSC resolution was passed Monday after Washington agreed to revise
the draft to accommodate the positions and concerns voiced by Beijing
and Moscow.
Following
a series of behind-the-scenes negotiations Sunday, diplomats agreed
not to ban oil exports into North Korea. Instead, the ninth set of
restrictive sanctions against Pyongyang, unanimously adopted by the
15-member UN Security Council, following North Korea's sixth nuclear
test earlier his month, authorized a cap of 2 million barrels a year
of sales of refined petroleum products to North Korea, Reuters
reported. The sanctions also place a cap on crude oil exports to the
communist regime at current levels.
The
UNSC also placed a ban on the country's textile exports, North
Korea's second-biggest export, totaling $752 million, according to
data from the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency.
Chinese
and Russian negotiators have also managed to persuade the US
delegation not to impose a travel ban or asset freeze on Kim Jong-un.
"We
are done trying to prod the regime from doing the right thing,"said
US UN Ambassador Nikki Haley. "We are now trying to stop it from
having the ability to do the wrong thing."
Japan's
UN mission called the latest resolution "an urgent call for
North Korea to change its behavior."
The
French UN mission described the new set of sanctions as an "antidote
[which will] pave the way for a political solution" to the
Korean peninsula crisis.
Just
ahead of the Security Council meeting, the North Korean foreign
ministry warned it will be forced to retaliate using “ultimate
means,” should stricter sanctions follow.
“In
case the US eventually does rig up the illegal and unlawful
'resolution' on harsher sanctions, the DPRK [Democratic People's
Republic of Korea] shall make absolutely sure that the US pays due
price,” the ministry's statement read, according to the state-run
KCNA news agency.
“The
DPRK is ready and willing to use any form of ultimate means. The
forthcoming measures to be taken by the DPRK will cause the US the
greatest pain and suffering it had ever gone through in its entire
history,” the statement added.
Russia
and China have been calling for a peaceful resolution to the Korean
crisis, urging both sides to avert provocations. While condemning
North Korea's nuclear ambitions, Moscow and Beijing are pushing for
the so-called double freeze initiative that would see North Korea
suspend its missile and nuclear tests in exchange for South Korea and
the US dropping their joint military exercises. The US has rejected
the proposal, asserting that its own exercises are legal, unlike
Pyongyang’s, which are subject to existing international sanctions.
"It
is clear that it is impossible to solve the problems of the Korean
peninsula by sanctions alone and pressure," Russian President
Vladimir Putin said at the economic forum in Vladivostok following
talks with South Korean President Moon Jae-in last week.
"One shouldn’t give in to emotions and drive North Korea into a corner," Putin stated, adding that everyone now needs to show composure, avoiding “steps that lead to an escalation of tension.”
From yesterday
Nuclear Reaction: US threatens actions against UN doing business with North Korea
From 4 days ago:
Christopher Green does speak a lot of nonsense (including here) but I believe he might be onto something when he says that further sanctions - specifically and oil embargo - may be the stimulus needed to stimulate an attack by North Korea in the style of Pearl Harbour.
Does anyone think this is just going to go away?
Why the North Koreans Aren’t Afraid of Either Sanctions or Nuclear War
Let's go back to what was only briefly mentioned earlier— the crisis surrounding North Korea. And, to the sensational words of Putin: “North Koreans will eat grass, but they won’t give up nuclear weapons."However, this is nothing they should be praised for. So, what would a unified and firm response to Pyongyang be?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.