The short item below from Russian Vesti News is worth a whole year’s commentary from any of the western ‘pundits’.
It
features interviews with people who were in North Korea during the
Soviet period and who know the country well.
Korea
is a country that is united,most of all around the idea that all
foreigners are enemies and will never give in to any form of
pressure.
This commentary from Dmitry Kisilev makes the points that it is the generals who are in charge of U.S. foreign policy (not exactly a Junta but almost). This features the words of Vladimir Putin who appears to me, along with the Chinese leadership, to be the only adult in the room.
Generals Rule US Foreign Policy
Let's go back to what was only briefly mentioned earlier— the crisis surrounding North Korea. And, to the sensational words of Putin: “North Koreans will eat grass, but they won’t give up nuclear weapons."However, this is nothing they should be praised for. So, what would a unified and firm response to Pyongyang be?
This interview of Dmitry Babich of Sputnik News with CPR’s Don DeBar was made before the UN vote yesterday.
Here is another Russian voice
What Is Going On Around North Korea? - Valeriy Pyakin
Here is commentary by Patrick Henningsen on RT
Henningsen:
US on the Wrong Side of History in North Korea
12
September, 2017
The
North Korean crisis took another turn this week. Yesterday, the UN
Security Council passed a new round of sanctions against North Korea,
following their recent alleged hydrogen bomb test.
According
to the UN’s High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, Izumi
Nakamitsu, North Korea does not want to start a nuclear war, and the
US is not seeking regime change in Pyongyang.
“I
don’t think DPRK wants to start a nuclear war,” said Nakamitsu in
Geneva on Tuesday.
She
added: “Maybe I‘m missing something but as far as I hear, no one
is really asking for any collapse of DPRK, quite the contrary. No one
is talking about regime change, quite the contrary.”
While
this may not be true in literal terms, US officials have made a
series of counterproductive nuclear threats to North Korea. While
Defense Secretary James Mattis raised
the prospects of
the US deploying nuclear warheads in South Korea, Senator John
McCain threatened North
Korea with “extinction” if they did not stop ‘their
aggression’.
“In
other words, make sure that Kim Jong Un knows that if he acts in an
aggressive fashion, the price will be extinction,” said McCain to
CNN’s Jake Tapper.
21WIRE
editor Patrick
Henningsen explains
the fundamental flaw in Washington’s calculus and what needs to
happen for negotiations to bear real fruit for peace in the
region. Watch:
Finally, here are today’s headlines.
The
U.S is threatening to remove China from the U.S dollar after moves by
China, Russia and others to remove THEMSELVES from the U.S dollar.
What
a joke! Looks as if America has run out of options except for the
military one.
North Korea sanctions ‘nothing compared to what will have to happen’: Trump
UN pressures DPRK by banning its textile exports, DPRK promises "pain and suffering" in return
September
12th, 2017 - Fort Russ News -
-
Al Mayadeen - - translated by Samer Hussein -
12
September, 2017
North
Korea has blasted the UN Security Council resolution on imposing
tougher sanctions on the country, saying the United States would
soon feel the “most terrible pain ever.”
“The
regime in Washington is obviously excited about a political,
economic and military confrontation and is obsessed with a vicious
game of holding back the progress made by the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea (DPRK) in developing its nuclear program, even
though the latter has already reached the stage of completion”,
North Korean ambassador Han Tae Song told the U.N.-sponsored
Conference on Disarmament in Geneva on Tuesday.
“I
hope the North Korean regime will listen to the message and choose
a different route”, said Robert Woods, the US ambassador for
disarmament at the forum in Geneva on Tuesday.
On
Monday, the United Nations Security Council unanimously voted to
adopt the US draft resolution on adding more sanctions against
North Korea because of its nuclear program.
The
sanctions include a ban on North Korea’s textile exports, a cap
on the export of crude oil and refined petroleum products to the
country and an embargo on natural gas liquids and condensates.
This
was the ninth sanctions resolution unanimously adopted by the
15-member council since 2006 due to North Korea's ballistic missile
and nuclear programmes.
The
US Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Nikki Haley,
said that the United States is not seeking a war with North Korea,
noting that Pyongyang has not yet reached the “point of no
return.”
“Today's
decision would not have been made if it wasn’t for the strong
relationship that developed between the US President Donald Trump
and the Chinese President Xi Jinping”, the US Permanent
Representative to the United Nations said.
North
Korea has vowed “pain and suffering” and “firm response”
while condemning the UNSC decision, for which it said had brought
things to a “completely reckless stage.”
Pyongyang’s nuclear program aims to ‘deter hostile US policy’ – N. Korea ambassador to Russia
No
sanctions will make North Korea change its policies, says the
country’s ambassador to Moscow. The diplomat added that North
Korea’s nuclear program will help his country better deter the
“hostile policy of the US”.
US threatens to ‘cut China off’ from dollar if it does not uphold sanctions against N. Korea
U.S.
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin. © Yuri Gripas / Reuters
RT,
13
September, 2017
The
US could impose economic sanctions on China if it does not implement
the new sanctions regime against North Korea, the US Treasury
Secretary has warned. Steven Mnuchin said the restrictions could
involve cutting off Beijing’s access to the US financial system.
“North
Korea economic warfare works,” Mnuchin
said Tuesday at the Delivering Alpha Conference in New York City. “We
sent a message that anybody who wanted to trade with North Korea –
we would consider them not trading with us.”
The
Treasury Secretary echoed the words of the US envoy to the UN, Nikki
Haley, by calling the fresh round of sanctions against
Pyongyang “historic.” Mnuchin
added “if
China doesn’t follow these sanctions, we will put additional
sanctions on them and prevent them from accessing the US and
international dollar system.”
Washington
has, so far, been reluctant to impose economic sanctions on China
over concerns of possible retaliatory measures from Beijing and the
potentially catastrophic consequences for the global economy.
Washington
runs a $350 billion annual trade deficit with Beijing. China also
holds $1 trillion in US debt, which amounts to 28 percent of US
Treasury bills, notes and bonds held by a foreign government.
US
lawmakers, however, seemed to be more inclined to exert pressure on
Beijing and other countries striking deals with Pyongyang as they
demand a “supercharged” response
to North Korea’s nuclear tests, including imposing sanctions on
companies from China and any other country doing business in North
Korea.
“I
believe the response from the United States and our allies should be
supercharged,” said
Ed Royce, chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs
Committee during a hearing Tuesday.
“We
need to use every ounce of leverage... to put maximum pressure on
this rogue regime,” he
said, adding that “time
is running out.” Royce
also called on Washington to target major Chinese banks, including
the Agricultural Bank of China and the China Merchants Bank for
dealing with Pyongyang.
He
also said China was apparently reluctant to follow through on the
sanctions adopted by the UN Security Council (UNSC) against the
North. “It’s
been a long, long time of waiting for China to comply with the
sanctions that we pass and, frankly, with the sanctions that the
United Nations passed,” he
said.
The
committee chair went on to say the US could give Chinese banks and
companies “a
choice between doing business with North Korea or the United
States.” He
added that the US should also “go
after banks and companies in other countries that do business with
North Korea the same way.”
Committee
members also expressed unease over the fact that the sanctions
imposed on North Korea have so far been ineffective in preventing
Pyongyang from developing its nuclear and missile programs.
“We’ve
been played by the Kims for years,” Republican
Representative Ted Poe said, referring to North Korean leader Kim
Jong-un and his predecessors, as reported by Reuters.
President
Donald Trump also downplayed the role of the newly adopted sanctions
later Tuesday. ”We
think it’s just another very small step, not a big deal. I don’t
know if it has any impact,” he
told reporters at the start of a meeting with Malaysian Prime
Minister Najib Razak.
Trump
also said he already discussed the issue with his State Secretary of
State Rex Tillerson. He ominously added that “those sanctions are
nothing compared to what ultimately will have to happen” without
specifying what he meant by that.
The
UNSC unanimously approved a new resolution on sanctions against
Pyongyang on September 11. Following a series of behind-the-scenes
negotiations Sunday, diplomats agreed not to ban oil exports into
North Korea. Instead, the ninth set of restrictive sanctions against
Pyongyang authorized an annual cap of 2 million barrels of refined
petroleum products to North Korea.
It
also banned the North’s textile exports – the second-biggest
export for the country, which totals $752 million – according to
data from the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. Chinese and
Russian negotiators managed to persuade the US delegation nt to
impose a travel ban or asset freeze on North Korea’s leader Kim
Jong-un.
On
Tuesday, the North Korean ambassador to Moscow said sanctions will
not make his country change its policies. Pyongyang’s nuclear
program helps it to deter the “hostile
policy of the US,” Kim
Yong-jae added.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.