Mike
Ruppert - Crumbs
I had not seen this, but watching this video brought up some pain remembering this period. I can clearly see the pain in Mike in reaction to events at a time when it seriously looked like the US and Israel were going to going to go to war- and nuclear war was certainly not out of the question.
I can see the extent to which Mike had lost his equanimity - to an extent that I have not seen over the whole time he was in Colorado.
For me personally, it was a time when I was involved with CollapseNet, drawing up a list of stories every day alongside Jenna Orkin and Rice Farmer. Mike had brought into the family because I was overwhelming his Facebook page (and presumably him) with stories.
Within a very few weeks of me being being there there was a crisis and Mike left CollapseNet to retire to practise permaculture in Sebastopol.
What I didn't know at the time was how close to suicide Mike was at that time and that, by his own admission, he had gone to Colorado 'to die'.
It is painful to see this video and I'm not sure I can see it through to the end, but am posting it to help us get another insight into Mike, his humanity and his torment.
One can never know what is going on in the innermost depths of someone else's soul - - so much less so if your communication is electronic.
I am fairly confident that during his time in Colorado by immersing himself in Dakota ways he came to know himself.
I have no problem in understanding the depth of the torment caused by the circumstances of his life and the pressures of being a whistleblower and 'prophet' for 35+ years.
I struggled to understand his spirituality, but now, after his death, I am getting some insights and am beginning to understand how it helped him to make his (albeit violent) transition to the Deathless.
ADDENDUM;
Apposite
comments from Michael Green -
"As
I see spirituality, Robin, it exists on every level, no exceptions
whatsoever. The problem is that we often mix up levels. As Jung said,
we also very frequently conflate transpersonal and collective
energies with the personal. These energies are archetypal in nature.
As such, they are said to be numinous, as well - rather like an acid
trip - which , unless we're good at distinguishing levels, can fuel
manic-like (mana-filled) behaviors or, in another kind of
personality, cause the ego to identify with them, perhaps conferring
a sense of infallible prophetic insight or that they themselves are
Jesus Christ or God. The thing of importance is that there are levels
of experience, and to conflate them is like rather trying to comb our
hair with a pitchfork just because a pocket comb too has teeth.
"Ideally,
the function of the ego is to assist in making these discriminations,
but if the ego function is shaky - due to any number of things,
including inherited disposition, poverty or serious loss (etc.) -
these discriminations are not well-made. At that point, say the
Jungians, the archetypal energy floods the ego with its own unique
character. Jung said that at the collective level, this is happening
all the time. We think we're in control but, really, we are acting
out the archetypal constellations of our time that are pouring
through the collective unconscious. I'm not thrilled with that term,
and to tell the truth I am also less than thrilled with many, if not
most, Jungians - they are often precious beyond belief, imagining
they have deep intellectual insight when they're just intellectually
constipated - but Jung himself, IMO, displayed quite a lot of insight
in these matters.
"The
objective of therapy, in his view, was not to channel the archetypes
and to become their vessel, but rather to become more conscious of
them and individuate from them, differentiating oneself from them
while yet relating to what might be termed the centralizing archetype
of the Self. Sadly, in our time, most "spirituality" seeks
to do the exact opposite. It imagines that the "higher" we
get, the more inflated we become with archetypal energies, the more
we're channeling something of importance. It not only destroys the
ego but, all too often, it also is soul-destroying as well.
"All
this applies to MCR, just as it applies to everyone on the planet.
But in this video, to be frank,. I don't see a lot of evidence of
that. Moreover, I totally agree with everything he said, except for
what I consider to be minor and mostly irrelevant details as to the
timing of the Eschaton. At around 11:00, he begins to get pissed. The
interviewer, however, has been baiting him. I totally get Michael's
anger at that stage. No matter, the interviewer persists. More
baiting. By 14:20, I myself want to punch the interviewer in the
face. I think Mike does too, probably quite unconsciously, which
accounts for his increasing agitation, frustration and anger.
Michael, however, is much nicer than me. He may or may not have
identified with a Christlike archetype toward the end - that too is
speculative, however - but here, I see him as well-mannered and very,
very lucid.
"Michael
definitely had his moments but I do not see this as one of them -
except, perhaps, for his tendency to go off at the mouth with
Cassandra-like predictions that were often too specific. That,
however, has to be deemed one of his more harmless traits. It's
rather endearing, actually.
"For
reasons I have just described, I see this as one of his best
interviews. No shame. My hope is that he takes it to the underworld
(where we're all going) with pride."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.