The
New Zealand governmentIs diverging funds from an insurance payout,
and from the Christchurchr ebuild into its own coffers
Housing
NZ cash cow for Govt: Labour
Report
shows insurance cash considered to help cover surprise dividend
demand
26
January, 2013
Housing
New Zealand considered using an insurance payout for Christchurch
earthquake damage to meet an unexpected demand to pay higher
dividends to the Government in 2011, official letters disclose.
The
heavily edited letters, provided to Labour housing spokesman Phil
Twyford under the Official Information Act, show that the corporation
also slowed down its repairs and maintenance to fund an unexpected
$45 million jump in the dividend required that year - from $63
million agreed in the agency's statement of intent to $108 million.
The
documents also reveal that Housing NZ plans to raise $383 million in
the three years to June 2016 by selling or leasing state houses to
community and iwi groups and "the possible introduction of third
party equity via possible overseas providers".
This
is the first time anyone has mentioned foreign companies being
involved in planned state house sales, and Mr Twyford said it might
point to possible public/private partnerships to redevelop state
housing.
He
said ministers had forced Housing NZ to pay $216 million more in
dividends than they gave it in capital contributions in the four
years to last June, and Housing NZ's statement of intent showed that
the agency planned to pay a further net $252 million to ministers in
the three years to June 2016. "If that's not asset-stripping, I
don't know what is."
"They
have reduced the net number of state houses by 700 in the last 12
months. They are using it as a cash cow in the middle of a housing
shortage." However a spokeswoman for Housing Minister Nick Smith
said Housing NZ had always had to pay a dividend and its highest
dividend in recent years was $176 million in 2002, under a Labour
Government.
"Saying
the dividend will come from the insurance payout is not true,"
she said. "Housing NZ's most recent statement of intent shows
very clearly that the insurance payment is for capital expenditure
and that its surplus [dividend] is funded out of normal operating
revenue."
A
letter from then Housing Minister Phil Heatley in May 2010 set
targets for the agency's return on equity of 1.1 per cent in 2010-11,
1.2 per cent in 2011-12 and 1.3 per cent in 2012-13. Those targets
were reiterated in February 2011. Then suddenly, in an undated letter
evidently written in May 2011 after the February 2011 earthquake, the
required returns were raised to 1.6 per cent in 2011-12 and 1.7 per
cent the next year.
Corporation
chairman Alan Jackson wrote back the next month stating that the
board would pay the extra $45 million required that year "from a
combination of operational savings, changes to capital structure that
may include increasing debt, and changes to capital programmes which
may include use of insurance proceeds from the Canterbury
earthquakes".
There
is no evidence in the documents that the insurance money was used to
pay the dividend. Other figures show that Housing NZ plans to spend a
net $542 million on repairs and new building in Christchurch in the
three years to June 2016, much more than the $320 million it received
in insurance claims.
However
the "operational savings" included decisions announced in
August 2011 to end the agency's social services and focus on its role
as a landlord, and to close its offices from April 2012 except for
appointments made through a call centre.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.