Monday 1 July 2019

Talking of clouds


Introduction to 
“homogenitus” cloud
A wee way back I posted an article with these strange cloud formations and explained that although I have seen these clouds on a regular basis in the last year whereas previously I had never seen them before at any stage of my 63 years on the planet.



A reader came back immediately  and helpfully pointed me towards pictures of what I learned are called scalar wave clouds.

 I decided to look back to previous years and see what Collier's Encyclopedia (ca. 1980) said about cloud formations.



On searching I found a video made by an Andy Leifer who leafs back over old books on clouds and finds examples from the 1920's and 1930's of altostratus clouds which Colliers says "rain or snow will follow within 15 or 20 hours"
The thing is that these clouds have NEVER ONCE produced rain or snow when I have seen them.

The following is what Wikipedia says about all of this:





Here is an example relating to different types of cirrus cloud:

High-level cirriform, stratocumuliform, and stratiform[edit]

High clouds form in the highest and coldest region of the troposphere from about 5 to 12 km (16,500 to 40,000 ft) in temperate latitudes.[4][5] At this altitude water almost always freezes so high clouds are generally composed of ice crystals or supercooled water droplets.

Genus cirrus[edit]

Cirrus uncinus clouds (V-2)
Cirrus spissatus (V-3) clouds
Cirrus fibratus radiatus (V-8)
Abbreviation: Ci
Cirriform clouds tend to be wispy and are mostly transparent or translucent. Isolated cirrus do not bring rain; however, large amounts of cirrus can indicate an approaching storm system eventually followed by fair weather.
There are several variations of clouds of the cirrus genus based on species and varieties:
Species[edit]
  • Cirrus fibratus (V-1)
    High clouds having the traditional "mare's tail" appearance. These clouds are long, fibrous, and curved, with no tufts or curls at the ends.
  • Cirrus uncinus (V-2)
    Filaments with up-turned hooks or curls.
  • Cirrus spissatus (V-3)
    Dense and opaque or mostly opaque patches.
  • Cirrus castellanus (V-4)
    A series of dense lumps, or "towers", connected by a thinner base.
  • Cirrus floccus (V-5)
    Elements which take on a rounded appearance on the top, with the lower part appearing ragged.[6]
Opacity-based varieties
  • None; always translucent except species spissatus which is inherently opaque.[7]
Fibratus pattern-based varieties
Pattern-based variety radiatus
Large horizontal bands that appear to converge at the horizon; normally associated with fibratus and uncinus species.
Pattern-based variety duplicatus
Sheets at different layers of the upper troposphere, which may be connected at one or more points; normally associated with fibratus and uncinus species.
  • Varieties are not commonly associated with Ci species spissatus, castellanus, or floccus.[6][7]
Precipitation-based supplementary features
  • Not associated with cirrus.
Cloud-based supplementary feature
  • Mamma
    Bubble-like downward protuberances; mostly seen with species castellanus.[8]
Genitus mother clouds
  • Cirrus cirrocumulogenitus
  • Cirrus altocumulogenitus
  • Cirrus cumulonimbogenitus
  • Cirrus homogenitus. Cirrus formed by spreading of aircraft contrails.
Mutatus mother cloud
  • Cirrus cirrostratomutatus

This was interesting. They have come up with a new category of clouds that was definitely not in Colliers or any former book on clouds - homeogenitus clouds


 "Contrails formed from the exhaust of aircraft flying in the upper level of the troposphere can persist and spread into formations resembling any of the high cloud genus-types and are now officially designated as cirrus, cirrostratus, or cirrocumulus homogenitus. If a homogenitus cloud of one genus changes to another genus type, it is then termed a homomutatus cloud. Stratus cataractagenitus (Latin for 'cataract-made') are generated by the spray from waterfalls. Silvagenitus (Latin for 'forest-made') is a stratus cloud that forms as water vapor is added to the air above a forest canopy.[83]"


Now, the interesting thing about the Wikipedia articles (there are at least two) on clouds is that they have the following examples of clouds that would certainly never have featured in previous books on clouds (because they never existed).

They are precisely those clouds that people have been posting on the internet to indicate geoengineering, 'chemtrails' and so forth.

It seems to me an attempt to paint as "normal" what is not normal at all.

Sceptics tend to point to articles like this and say "look, here you are. It's all normal and scientific".

What we are seeing however, is nothing more or less than a classification of clouds using traditional criteria.

Just classifying something and giving it a Latin name gives it a scientific aura and says nothing about the origin of the clouds.

Here are some examples of what I am talking about.

 With those Latin names it has to be real, right?



Just because something as weird as the above is given a name like cirrus fibratus radiatus  does it mean that it has a natural origin?

Of course it doesn't!

Here are some cloud formations that have been described as scalar energy clouds.

I haven't seen any examples of these with a Latin name!




Talking of "cirrus homegenitus"  here is an article someone wrote about this.

Cirrus Homogenitus

Posted on December 12, 2017 by arjaybe

Credit Craig Sunter – CC-BY
Cloud of the Day – Cirrus Homogenitus
In the past, meteorologists refused to include human-made phenomena in their classifications of cloud types. Yes, they said, the steam and smoke coming out of our smokestacks can appear like clouds or fog, but they’re not really. While weather observers might observe reduced visibility and even attribute it in part to our activities, there was no place for them on the reporting forms. If they were going to mention smog or condensation trails, it would be in the comments only. In the case of condensation trails, they became abbreviated in common language as “contrails.” On the reporting forms they appeared in the comments section as “COTRA.”

Credit Acabashi – CC-BY-SA
Now, with the updating this year of the International Cloud Atlas, hosted by the World Meteorological Organization, as reported on the Green Comet blog, a number of new cloud types have been included. I’ve already reported on asperitas, volutus and flumen, which are natural cloud types that have been included in this edition of the Atlas. Today I present another inclusion, this time a cloud type that results from human activity: cirrus homogenitus. Literally, cirrus made by humans. Condensation trails can now come out of the comments and take their rightful place in the form proper.

Credit Adam Jones Ph.D – CC-BY-SA
Cirrus homogenitus is the new name for contrails that have persisted for at least ten minutes. It comes in the one type only, with no sub-types or varieties. That’s because contrails are usually quite ephemeral and either disappear or change rapidly.

Credit Blue Stahli Luan – CC-BY
Cirrus homogenitus are like other cirrus clouds in that they don’t result in any precipitation or other weather. Unlike cirrus, they can’t even be credited with foretelling the approach of a weather system. They’re just the result of an airplane flying in the stratosphere, portending nothing more than its arrival, hopefully at its destination.
And another article -

Weather Engineering Signatures in Cloud Formations
GIANT RADIALS


Giant radial cloud formation over the Santa Barbara, Ca, USA coastline. November 1, 2016
—Photo © Anthony Craddock
Canon EOS 5D Mk IV
f/8, 1/320, ISO-100, 16mm






What does this indicate?

First of all, it is not a natural cloud pattern.
Here is the official 1928 U.S. Government Department of Agriculture Weather Bureau catalog of Cloud Forms,
compiled by the Weather Bureau Cloud Committee.
This was authored at a time when the clouds were not being artificially manipulated by unseen electromagnetic forces, so is a great reference for how true natural cloud forms should look.
(As are many of the skies filmed in old movies!)
Many of us are too young to have ever seen true natural clouds in the sky

“Thank you, so much, for making this document available.  The younger generation will never be able to help heal the atmosphere in the future if they don't have information like this to see what the unmolested atmosphere looks like.  Brilliant move!!”
Best regards.

Peter Lindemann
28 April, 2019

Click to Download this free reference booklet
(thanks so much to our brilliant research assistant for finding this booklet)

So what is going on here?
Tom Bearden's diagrams in his “Fer de Lance” and  “Star Wars Now!” books shows us exactly how this cloud formation indicates the steering of the jetstream across the U.S.A by creating low and high pressure spots.
These books are recommended for further study.



Embedded in this Interference Zone is a
NETWORK OF VIRTUAL (non physical) TRANSMITTERS
which are used to steer the jet stream by creating hotspots and cold spots
VIRTUAL TRANSMITTERS EMBEDDED IN THE INTERFERENCE GRID

Embedded in this Interference Zone is a
FORMATION OF A SINGLE GIANT RADIA

FORMATION OF A DOUBLE GIANT RADIAL
A comprehensive explanation of how exactly all this scalar EM weather engineering is carried out, as well as its history of development, can be seen in Tom Bearden's classic DVD “Soviet Weather Engineering over North America.” 
Moving the jet stream around to engineer the weather can, for example, entrain moisture from over the Pacific Ocean, and mix it with cold air displaced from Canada to create snow and icy conditions.  If curls are added, tornadoes will result, and so on.
 
Note: the radial clouds are now deliberately “roughed up” to try to make the pattern less obvious to casual observers. They are usually stable in a wind blown sky, and will disappear almost immediately when the generating power is cut off.


HOW DOES THE INVISIBLE SCALAR EM SIGNAL CREATE THESE VISIBLE SIGNATURES IN THE CLOUD PATTERNS?
 
 The reason that clouds of water droplets and/or ice particles detect the scalar interferometry and form signature patterns is simple:
Consider each H2O molecule as having two light little hydrogen atoms hanging on to the much heavier oxygen atom.  The covalent sharing with the oxygen atom of the electron from each hydrogen atom means that
(1) the electrostatic scalar potential between the H ion and the O ion it is bonded to, is rhythmically varying as the electron is shared back and forth,
(2) this varying potential contains “electron spin holes” since it is made by the moving electron,
(3) two such varying potentials exist since there are two H atoms sharing covalent electrons with the O atom,
(4) the two H ions are at an angle of over 100 degrees with respect to each other,
(5) the molecule assembly thus constitutes one part (one half, so to speak) of a scalar interferometer with imbedded electron spin holes for electron hooking,
(6) Incident scalar waves from outside the system interact with the “half scalar interferometer.”  This scalar interferometry interaction is coupled to the covalent bonding electron because of the internal spin hole pattern of the molecular half of the interferometer.  The coupled electron moves with the scalar pattern's changes, causing an observable interaction with and in the electrical structure and ionic potential of the molecule,
(7) the weak H to H hydrogen bonding between molecules connects resulting ionic potential changes to the structuring of the entire macroscopic cloud assembly.  Thus by scalar interferometry with the H2O “half interferometers”, an incident scalar EM pattern is detected and translated into patterns of E and B force fields.  The H2O molecules then “line up” in accord with the electrical patterns detected.
   
Thus the clouds form “signature patterns” according to the incident scalar EM radiation patterns.  Giant cloud radials in the targeted area are probably due to the type and shape of antennas—including the type and shape of the electrical wires establishing the antennas' ground planes—used by the Soviet Union to project the scalar waves.  Note that such “radial” antenna patterns were occasionally used by James Harris Rogers in his underground and undersea scalar EM transmission system. 

        [For Rogers' patents, see U.S. patent numbers 1,316,188, Radiosignaling system, Sept.16, 1919; 1,322,622, Wireless Signaling System, Nov. 25, 1919 (figure 6 of this patent clearly shows a “radial wire” ground plane antenna); 1,349,103, Radiosignaling system, Aug. 10, 1920 (the fourth version in figure 1 shows inside/outside variation which, for the long waves used, to a distant observer appears as a varying magnetostatic scalar potential using opposing B fields); 1,349,104, Radiosignaling system, Aug.  10, 1920; 1,220,005, Wireless Signaling System, Mar. 20, 1917; 1,303,729, Wireless signaling system, May 13, 1919; 1,303,730, Radiosignaling system, May 13,1919;  l,315,862, Radiosignaling system, Sept. 9, 1919; also 958,829, Method and Apparatus for Producing High Frequency Oscillating Currents, May 24,1910.].
 
—Tom Bearden excerpt from “Fer de Lance”
Note: as an American military officer on active status, Tom Bearden's focus was always outside the U.S. on external threats.
There are however other nations involved in weather modification. And other technologies being used (chemtrails, cloud seeding,  Reich cloudbusters etc. are not discussed here).



Read the rest of the article HERE

Posted by at
Labels: , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)