"This Cannot Be Tolerated":
Beijing Hints It Could Send
Troops Into Hong Kong If
Protests Don't Stop
24 July, 2019
A
few days after another round of violent protests rocked Hong Kong,
Beijing on Wednesday issued its harshest warning yet to the citizens
of Hong Kong:
It
sought to remind them that Beijing has the authority to mobilize the
People's Liberation Army garrison in Hong Kong if it felt that the
central government's authority was threatened.
The New
York Times reports
that the warning was part of the unveiling of the Communist Party's
new "defense strategy" which relied heavily on demonizing
the western powers - an oblique reference to the US and the UK - for
encouraging the protests.
Col.
Wu Qian
Citing
the Sunday protests, Senior Col. Wu Qian, a spokesman for China's
defense ministry, implied that the destructive behavior - protesters
painted the central government's liaison office with graffiti, the
latest example of the extradition bill protests leading to the
vandalism of government buildings - was swiftly straining the
patience of Beijing.
"The
behavior of some radical protesters challenges the central
government’s authority,touching
on the bottom line principle of 'one country, two systems,'"
Colonel Wu said during a news conference in Beijing where he laid out
the government's new strategy. "That
absolutely cannot be tolerated."
When
pressed, Wu said that "Article 14 of the Garrison Law has clear
stipulations," and refused to elaborate, the SCMPreports.
Hong
Kong's government would need to request the garrison's assistance,
like it does during a natural disaster.
In
response, a spokesman for the Hong Kong government said on Wednesday
that the city was "fully capable" of dealing with its own
affairs.
"There is no need to ask for assistance from the garrison," he said.
Eric
Chan Kwok-ki, director of the Chief Executive’s Office, dismissed
Wu's reference to the Garrison law, suggesting that it wasn't a
threat.
"This is nothing new," he said. "The Hong Kong government has no plan to seek help from the [PLA Hong Kong] garrison in accordance with that provision."
The
press conference coincided with the
release of a new defense report -
the first to be published since the beginning of Xi Jinping's second
term - that identified these same 'western powers' as a threat to
global stability. It's one of the clearest signs yet that Beijing
views the US as its key geopolitical adversary, and is ready to
strike back should Washington continue to 'support' Taiwan by
supplying it with advanced arms. The paper restated Beijing's goal of
eventually presiding over the 'reunification' of Taiwan with mainland
China - and notably didn't rule out the use of force.
Notably,
the paper accused the US of jeopardizing international stability by
expanding its nuclear arsenal, boost its missile defenses and
cyberwarfare capabilities and weaponize outer space (remember the
Space Force?).
Circling
back to the press conference, Col. Wu cited the specific laws
detailing relations between Hong Kong and Beijing that would allow
the PLA to intervene. Notably, Hong Kong wasn't specifically
mentioned in China's new defense paper, but Wu relayed the
above-mentioned warning and the Communist Party's view on the
situation in response to a question asked by the 'press'. Not long
before Wu spoke, Hong Kong police arrested six men for partaking in
Sunday's protests and a similarly violent episode that took place on
July 1. Some of these men reportedly had links to 'triad' criminal
gangs.
Protests
have been ongoing in Hong Kong since mid-June, in response to the HK
government's fast-tracking of a controversial extradition bill that
would have empowered Beijing to extradite people from Hong Kong (both
citizens and people just passing through) something that would give
it unprecedented powers to crack down on dissidents.
If
the PLA were to 'intervene' in the protests, local financial markets
would probably melt down (HK's stock market has performed remarkably
well despite the protests). Western powers would also condemn China's
actions, and it might impact the prospects for a permanent trade
truce to the US. But would the West actually do anything
to stop them? That's extremely unlikely.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.