BREAKING:
Court Orders Hillary Clinton To Testify UNDER OATH about Private
Email Server
Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch
More
than two-years after Hillary Clinton refused to answer some of
Judicial Watch's questions about her email server, a judge is
stepping in to make her comply. One America's Kara McKinney has the
latest on the lawsuit.
Courtesy
of OAN
So
far, no compliant audits have emerged in the public domain
from 1998, 1999 or 2000 — years when Bill Clinton was
president and when those running his foundation may have believed the
IRS and Department of Justice would not intervene to enforce
laws and regulations.
‘Judgement
Day' Nears: Analyst on Why Clinton May Finally End Up Behind Bars
Ekaterina
Blinova
15
November, 2018
While
the rumours about Hillary Clinton's potential third presidential run
continue to circulate in the media, the conservative camp is
seemingly determined to "lock her up." Speaking to Sputnik,
Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel explains why "judgement day"
for the Clinton Foundation is near.
It
appears that US conservatives are not going to let former
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton go. Controversy is
still simmering around the Clinton Foundation and Hillary
Clinton's email scandal.
Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst and investigative journalist who
has been conducting a private investigation into the Clintons'
charity, calls the Clinton Foundation the
biggest charity fraud ever.
The
analyst emphasizes the importance of November 15 as a date
for the Clintons, suggesting that the truth about their
charity may soon emerge.
For
his part, Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch tweeted November 15 that
the Federal Court ruled that Hillary Clinton will have to answer
the watchdog's further questions concerning her Clinton.com,
non-state.gov email system.
"The
public and the media have a right to a full accounting from top
officials of the Clinton State Department," Judicial Watch
President Tom Fitton said.
Sputnik:
Why is November 15, 2018 a crucial date for the Clinton
Foundation?
Charles
Ortel:
Under US federal laws, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton
Foundation ("BHCCF") must file a complete, truthful report
on IRS Form 990 by the close of business on November
15, 2018 concerning its operations and financial results for 2017.
This is the final filing deadline and no extensions are possible.
In
addition, BHCCF must file reports with numerous states by 15
November 2018. Many of these states impose tough filing
requirements — one example is New York State, which,
effectively, is the base from which BHCCF's
globaYork requires charities
to list out all of their subsidiaries, branches and
affiliates, to provide details concerning all of the grants
given to them by governments (foreign and domestic), and
to procure an audit from an independent and certified
professional accounting firm that is wholly consistent with US
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Since
1998, when these New York laws were applied, BHCCF has never complied
and therefore has been in gross, uncured violation of laws
which the state has enforced vigorously, including with respect
to the Trump Foundation.
Sputnik:
Why do you insist that the charity will not be able to present a
comprehensive fiscal report? How is the situation likely to unfold
in this case?
Charles
Ortel:
In the US, strict
rules apply
to financial reporting for charities. The report that is
due concerning 2017 can only be filed accurately if BHCCF attempts
to correct years of false and misleading prior filings that
used accounting techniques not allowed in the US for charities
and includes missing schedules and information that never was validly
filed.
When
formed on October 23, 1997, BHCCF was then called the "William
J. Clinton Presidential Foundation". Despite being required
to do so, this entity did not file an IRS return on form
990 for the "short period" from its formation
through December 31, 1997. There is no statute of limitations
concerning this failure to file an initial "short period"
return.
Financial
information purporting to be "audits" for 2001,
2002, 2003, and 2004 has emerged, though these documents
are omitted from the
BHCCF web portal.
These
reports flatly state that they are prepared using accounting
techniques that are not permitted within the United States.
The
first attempt to file compliant accounting reports was made
starting June 9, 2006, when BHCCF attempted to correct work
issued for 2003, 2004, and 2005. This attempt is manifestly
false and misleading, as I have explained through my website.
It
is not possible to file correct, truthful reports concerning
2017 without correcting all previous filings. Think of a
house, built on a foundation of sludge — you can
paint the outside (provide a view of what happened in 2017)
and make it look nice superficially, but if you fail to remove
the sludge and ensure that it rests on solid ground, it will
inevitably collapse.
Sputnik:
Why do you believe that this time the IRS will pay much more
attention to discrepancies in the Clinton Foundation's
files?
Charles
Ortel:
Under George W. Bush and then under Barack Obama, the IRS
division that oversees charities was run by a controversial
person named Lois Lerner.
In
the early period of the Trump presidency, forces
loyal to former President Obama (in
particular), appear to have defended against efforts
to expose the true extent of abuses perpetrated by Lerner
and her allies using the IRS to target political opponents,
chiefly conservatives during the Obama years.
Even
now, I and others suspect that the Justice Department still has Obama
loyalists working actively to obstruct the progress of the
Trump Administration. It was only recently that President Trump was
able to have the Senate confirm his choice to head the
IRS — Charles Rettig.
So,
November 15, 2018 will be the first filing deadline when Trump
appointees at the IRS and the Justice Department have firm and
informed hands on the levers of power — one hopes
they will administer justice fairly.
Sputnik:
If suspicions are justified, what sort of inquiries and probes
could be launched by state and federal authorities and how could
it backfire on the Clintons' associates, the charity donors and
Hillary, Bill and Chelsea Clinton?
Charles
Ortel:
Recently, a former Republican US congressman, Steve Stockman,
was sentenced to 10
years in federal prison for a set of crimes involving
only $1 million in charity fraud as well as public
corruption.
Previously,
a former Democratic US congressman, Corrine Brown, was sentenced to 5
years in federal prison for her role in a similarly
sized charity fraud.May
Find Her Way to Jail
Using
flawed figures that likely do not capture the full extent of
"donations" sent towards the network of Clinton
"charities", about $3 billion may have been sent
towards BHCCF and its affiliates.
Because
BHCCF has never had a board of trustees tough enough to defend
the interests of that entity against the conflicted
personal and political interests of the Clinton family, BHCCF
has never been validly audited, and no outsider actually knows how
much money may have been stolen or diverted for illegal purposes
since 1997.
Once
the November 15, 2018 deadline passes,
I suspect the federal government and state authorities will be forced
to shine spotlights on ongoing abuses perpetrated by BHCCF,
its executives, its trustees/directors, and its significant donors.
All of these should have been able to spot obvious errors,
false statements and omissions that have been circulating in the
public domain, around the world, for years.
This
Is Why Everything Needs To Be Put In Place Before The Hammer Is
Dropped
X22
Report
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.