Paul
Craig Roberts On Assange: "Justice Has Disappeared In The West"
23
November, 2018
Justice
has disappeared in the West. In Justice’s place stands Revenge.
This fact is conclusively illustrated by Julian Assange’s ongoing
eight year ordeal.
For
eight years Julian Assange’s life has been lived in a Kafka Police
State. He has been incarcerated first under British house arrest and
then in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, despite the absence of any
charges filed against him.
Meanwhile,
the entirety of the Western world, with the exception of former
Educadoran President Rafael Correa and a UN agency that examined the
case and ruled Assange was being illegally detained by the UK
government’s refusal to honor his grant of political asylum, has
turned its back to the injustice.
Assange
is locked away in the Ecuadoran Embassy, because to protect him from
false arrest, former Ecuadoran President Correa gave him political
asylum. However, the corrupt and servile UK government that serves
Washington, and not justice or law, refused to honor Assange’s
asylum. The US vassal known as the UK stands ready to arrest Assange
on Washington’s orders if he steps outside the embassy and to hand
him over to Washington, where a large number of both Democrats and
Republicans in Congress have said he should be executed. The Trump
regime, carrying on the illegal practices of its forebears, has a
secret indictment waiting to be revealed once they have their hands
on Assange.
The
current president of Ecuador a servant of Washington, Lenin Moreno—a
person so lacking in character that his name is an insult to Lenin—
is working a deal with Washington to rescind Assange’s grant of
asylum so that the Ecuadoran Embassy in London has to expel Assange
into the hands of Washington.
What
has Assange done? He has done nothing but to tell the truth. He is a
journalist who heads Wikileaks, a news organization that publishes
leaked documents—exactly as the New York Times published the leaked
Pentagon Papers from Daniel Ellsberg. Just as the publication of the
Pentagon Papers embarrassed the US government and helped to bring
about the end of the senseless Vietnam War, the documents leaked to
Wikileaks embarrassed the US government by revealing Washington’s
war crimes, lies, and deception of the American people and US allies.
The
allies, of course, were bought off by Washington and remained silent,
but Washington intends to crucify Assange for the embarrassment and
payoff expense he caused the criminal government in Washington.
In
order to assert authority over Assange, Washington is using the
extra-territoriality of US law, a claim that Washington bases not on
law but on might alone and uses to violate the sovereignty of
independent countries. Assange is a citizen of Australia and Ecuador.
He is not subject to US law. Even if he were, he has committed no
espionage. The false equivalence Washington is trying to establish
between the exercise of the First Amendment and treason shows how
totally lost are the American people. The silence of the US media
demonstrates that the presstitutes don’t mind losing the First
Amendment’s protection as they have no intention of telling any
truths.
Washington’s
secret indictment—it is secret so that two-bit punks such as James
Ball can write in the Guardian that Assange faces no threat of arrest
( https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/11/18/empire-keeps-proving-assange-right-about-everything.html )
—most likely accuses Assange of espionage. But it is not legally
possible to accuse a non-citizen operating outside the country of
espionage. All countries engage in espionage. Every country on earth
could accuse Washington of espionage and arrest the CIA. The CIA
could, as it often has, accuse Israel of espionage. Of course, any
Israeli, such as Jonathan Pollard, who is convicted of espionage in
the US becomes a point of contention between Washington and Israel
and Israel always wins. The corrupt Obama regime released Pollard
from his life sentence on orders and, no doubt, generous bribes, from
Israel.
If
Assange were Israeli, he would be home free, but he is a citizen of
two countries whose governments place high value on being
Washington’s vassals.
There
was a time in America, many decades ago, when the Democrats stood for
justice and the Republicans stood for greed.
There
was a time in America, prior to 9/11, when the media would have
rushed to the defense of the freedom of the press and defended
Assange from his mistreatment and false charges. To be sure that the
reader understands the mistreatment of Assange, it is identical to
the mistreatment of Cardinal Josef Mindszenty of Hungary whose asylum
in the US Embassy in Budapest was not acknowledged by the Soviet
government, forcing Mindszenty to live out all but three years of his
remaining life in the US embassy. President Nixon negotiated his
release in 1971, but the Nixon haters give Nixon no credit for his
attention to one man locked away in an injustice part of the
earth.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/József_Mindszenty
Today
there is no such attention to injustice except for the “victim”
groups in Identity Politics. Where is the champion of Assange now
that Rafael Correa has to live abroad to avoid persecution by
Washington’s puppet Moreno?
The
weakness of the intellect in the West is scary. Caitlin Johnstone
tells us about it: “Trump’s despicable prosecution of Assange,
and corporate liberalism’s full-throated support for it, has fully
discredited all of mainstream US politics on both sides of the aisle.
Nobody in that hot mess stands for anything. If you’re still
looking to Trump or the Democrats to protect you from the rising tide
of fascism, the time to make your exit is now.”
The
entirety of the Western print and TV media—even Russia’s
RT—serves as a propaganda ministry for Washington against Assange.
For example, we read over and over that Assange is hiding out in the
London Ecuadoran Embassy to avoid rape charges in Sweden. That the
presstitutes and the feminists can keep this bogus claim alive
despite all the official repudiation of it shows the Matrix in which
Western peoples are corralled.
Assange
has never been charged with rape. The two Swedish women who seduced
him and brought him into their beds in their homes never said he
raped them. Assange’s tribulations began when one of the women who
seduced him worried that he did not use a condom and that he might
have HIV or Aids. She asked Assange to take a test to see if he was
sex disease free, and Assange, offended, refused. This was his
mistake. He should have said, “of course, I understand your
concern” and taken the test.
The
woman went to the police to see if Assange could be forced to take
the test. It was the police who turned this into a rape
investigation. Charges were brought, and the Swedish prosecutorial
office investigated and dropped all charges as the sex was
consensual.
Assange
left Sweden legally, not in flight as the story that Washington has
planted has it. He went to England, another mistake as England is
Washington’s playground. Washington and/or lesbian feminists
lusting for the conviction of a heterosexual male convinced a female
Swedish prosecutor to reopen the closed case.
In
an unprecedented act, the Swedish prosecutor issued an order to the
UK for Assange to be handed over for questioning. Extradition orders
are only valid for filed charges, and there were no filed charges,
only dismissed charges. Never before had even the corrupt UK
government granted an extradition order for questioning. The UK
government, Washington’s puppet, agreed to hand over Assange to
Sweden. It was completely clear as there was no case in Sweden
against Assange that the Swedish prosecutor, probably for a large
sum, would turn Assange over to Washington, a place in which no legal
protections exist for anyone, not even for those, such as
whistleblowers, who are protected by US law, but, despite the
protection of law, nevertheless go to prison.
Seeing
what was coming, Assange was granted political asylum by President
Correa and escaped house detention in the UK to make it to the
Ecuadoran Embassy in London, where he has been ever since, despite
the Swedish government’s dropping of all charges against Assange
and again closing the investigation.
In
the meantime a US attorney, corrupt as they all are—never believe
any federal indictment as they are created out of whole cloth without
any need of evidence—managed to convince an incompetent American
grand jury to indict Assange for what we do not yet know, but most
likely for espionage.
The
US grand jury that approved the secret indictment has no
comprehension that they indicted a person for telling the truth
precisely as protected—and required if government is to be
controlled by the people—by the US Constitution. All Assange did
was to publish documents sent to Wikileaks by a person with a moral
conscience who was disturbed at the blatant criminality and
inhumanity of the US government.
There
is no legal difference whatsoever between Wikileaks publishing the
documents leaked to Wikileaks, and the New York Times publishing the
Pentagon Papers leaked to the New York Times.
The
difference is the difference in time. When Daniel Ellsberg leaked the
Pentagon Papers to the New York Times, the media had not been
concentrated into a few hands by the corrupt Clinton regime, and
9/11, which was used by Dick Cheney to criminalize truth-telling, had
not occurred. Therefore in the 1970s it was still possible that some
important part of the media might tell the truth. Nevertheless, the
only reason that the NYTimes published the Pentagon Papers is that
the newspaper hated Richard Nixon, who the Democratic media blamed
for the Vietnam War even though it was Democratic President Johnson’s
war and Nixon wanted to end it.
When
the insouciant American and Western peoples accept their governments’
lies, they accept their own demise and servitude. The willingness and
abandon with which the Western peoples submit makes one conclude that
they prefer servitude. They don’t want to be free, because freedom
has too many responsibilities, and they don’t want the
responsibilities. They want go watch a movie, or a TV program, or
play video games, or have sex, go shopping, get drunk, have a drug
high, or whatever form of amusement that they value far more than
they value liberty, or truth, or justice.
To
a person of my disappearing generation, it is inexplicable that the
nations of the world, much less Americans, would stand moot while the
world’s best, most trusted and most honest journalist is set up by
a totally corrupt US government for destruction. The result of
Assange’s persecution will be to criminalize embarrassing the US
government.
When
I contemplate this massive injustice to which the peoples of the
world reply with silence, I wonder if those trying to save Western
Civilization are not
misguided.https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/11/19/merkel-deep-sixed-germany-diversity-deep-sixed-western-civilization/ What
is the point of saving a totally corrupt civilization?
Those
who attack Assange are despicable. If you have a chance to push one
or more of those who are members of the lynch mob in front of a
truck, think of the act as a cleansing opportunity.
See: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50620.htm andhttp://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50615.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.