Starting
on Monday -- Facebook is Doing it Too
Facebook labels Palestinian journalism “hate speech”
Facebook Tells CNN To ‘Shut Up!’
There is no doubt that Facebook hides behind political neutrality. It fears driving away conservative users for both business and stated mission reasons.
That strategy is exploited by those like Jones who know that no matter how extreme and damaging their actions, they’ll benefit from equivocation that implies “both sides are guilty,” with no regard for degree.
Instead of being banned from Facebook, Infowars and sites like it that constantly and purposely share dangerous hoaxes and conspiracy theories should be heavily down-ranked in the News Feed.
Effectively, they should be quarantined, so that when they or their followers share their links, no one else sees them.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/07/13/her...
https://www.infowars.com/cnn-lobbies-...
Facebook labels Palestinian journalism “hate speech”
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/facebook-labels-palestinian-journalism-hate-speech
Facebook
is defending its decision to shut down the page of a major
Palestinian news outlet, describing the action as a move against
“hate speech.”
On
Saturday, the social media giant closed
without warning the
page of the Safa Palestinian Press Agency, which had 1.3 million
followers, as well as Safa’s account on the photo sharing site
Instagram.
On
Tuesday, the Palestinian Media Association condemned Facebook’s
widening assault on the free speech of Palestinian journalists,
calling it “clear submission to the policies and dictates of the
Israeli occupation which is pursuing Palestinian activists on the
basis of their political views and intellectual positions and issuing
prison sentences against them.”
But
Facebook is justifying the removal of Safa’s account. “This page
was correctly removed for violating our community standards,” a
company spokesperson emailed The Electronic Intifada Monday evening.
“There is no room for hate speech or incitement of violence on our
platform.”
The
spokesperson provided no evidence to back up the company’s
accusations against Safa, but asserted, “We care about the voices,
opinion and rights of all the different communities on Facebook;
however, keeping our community safe is our priority.”
By
referring to “hate speech” and “incitement” as justifications
to silence journalists, Facebook has adopted the framework of Israel,
which routinely uses such broad and ill-defined terms to describe
virtually all criticism of its violent military occupation over
Palestinians or of its state ideology, Zionism.
The
company did not respond to a question about whether it had taken the
action against Safa based on a request from Israel.
“Eagerness”
The
Intercept’s Glenn
Greenwald has previously written and spoken about
Facebook’s collusion with Israel and the United States to silence
voices they don’t like.
“Facebook
has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness – at times bordering on
eagerness – to curry favor with powerful governments by deleting
content that they dislike,” Greenwald told The Electronic Intifada
on Tuesday.
“One
of the countries to which Facebook has proven itself most subservient
is the Israeli government, and as a result, it has engaged in a
year-long censorship spree against Palestinians whose crime is that
they express views and engage in activism that Israeli officials
dislike.”
According to
the Israeli newspaper Haaretz,
Facebook’s latest crackdown on Palestinian journalists and
activists began several weeks ago, after Israeli occupation
forces extrajudicially
executed Ahmad
Nasser Jarrar, a man Israel claims was involved in the shooting death
of an Israeli settler in early January.
Israeli
lawmakers also discussed how
to suppress online content, including getting Facebook to take down
images of Jarrar.
Since
the beginning of the year, Haaretz says,
citing an unnamed Palestinian activist who monitors the issue, about
500 Facebook pages of Palestinian activists and journalists have been
closed by the company.
Wide-ranging coverage
According
to Haaretz,
Safa has been operating for a decade as a “Hamas-affiliated”
counterpart to Wafa, the official Palestinian news agency that is
controlled by the Palestinian Authority and the Fatah faction led by
Mahmoud Abbas.
But
Safa’s website shows
that its reporting is fairly typical of a wide range of Palestinian
media outlets, covering violence by Israeli occupation forces against
Palestinians, local, regional and international politics, and human
interest stories.
The
outlet carries reports on the activities of all political factions.
On Tuesday, for instance, one
of its lead stories was
on a cabinet meeting led by Rami Hamdallah, the PA prime minister, in
which Hamdallah asserted that his government “will not abandon our
people in Gaza.”
The
report includes the PA’s claims about the achievements of its
efforts in Gaza, such as bringing together 55 countries at a donors
conference last week to fund a $565 million water desalination plant
in the Israeli-blockaded coastal territory.
Another
report Tuesday
carries a statement by Abbas’ official spokesperson describing
recent US decisions to cut aid to the PA as “a war on our people.”
Obeying censorship
Palestinians
are avid users of Facebook and it is often a primary source of
information about what is happening in their communities.
But
social media has made it hard for Israel’s censors to control
information flowing from and to Palestinians under their military
rule.
Last
week, an Israeli military court sentenced Palestinian
teenager Ahed Tamimi to eight months in prison for slapping a heavily
armed occupation soldier in the West Bank.
Israel’s
persecution of the Tamimi family over the incident has become an
international rallying point for Palestine solidarity.
But
for now, Israel appears to have solved its Facebook problem by
leaning on the company to submit to its commands.
According
to Glenn Greenwald, “Facebook has empowered Israeli officials to
control its content by obeying their censorship dictates in almost
all cases.”
Facebook Tells CNN To ‘Shut Up!’
There is no doubt that Facebook hides behind political neutrality. It fears driving away conservative users for both business and stated mission reasons.
That strategy is exploited by those like Jones who know that no matter how extreme and damaging their actions, they’ll benefit from equivocation that implies “both sides are guilty,” with no regard for degree.
Instead of being banned from Facebook, Infowars and sites like it that constantly and purposely share dangerous hoaxes and conspiracy theories should be heavily down-ranked in the News Feed.
Effectively, they should be quarantined, so that when they or their followers share their links, no one else sees them.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/07/13/her...
https://www.infowars.com/cnn-lobbies-...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.