Top
U.S. Shale Oil Fields Decline Rate Reaches New Record…. Half
Million Barrels Per Day
25
July, 2018
While
the U.S. reached a new record of 11 million barrels of oil production
per day last week, the top five shale oil fields also suffered the
highest monthly decline rate ever. This is bad news for the
U.S. shale industry as it must produce more and more oil each month,
to keep oil production from falling.
According
to the newest EIA Drilling Productivity Report, the top five U.S.
Shale Oil fields monthly oil decline rate is set to surpass a half
million barrels per day in August. Thus,
the companies will have to produce at last 500,000 barrels of
new oil next month just to keep production flat.
Here
are the individual shale oil field charts from the EIA’s July
Drilling Productivity Report:
The
figures that are shown above the UP arrow denote the forecasted
new production added next month while the figures above the DOWN
arrow provide the monthly legacy decline rate. For example, the
chart on the bottom right-hand side is for the Permian Region.
The EIA forecasts that the Permian will add 296,000 barrels per day
(bpd) of new shale oil production in August, while the existing wells
in the field will decline by 223,000 bpd.
If
we add up these top five shale oil fields monthly decline rate for
August will be 503,000 bpd. Thus, the shale oil companies must
produce at least 503,000 bpd of new oil supply next month just to
keep production from falling. And, we must remember, this
decline rate will continue to increase as shale oil production rises.
We
can see this in the following chart below. Again, according to
the EIA’s figures, the
top five U.S. shale oil fields monthly legacy decline rate increased
from 398,000 bpd in January to 503,000 bpd for August:
In
just the first seven months of 2018, the total monthly decline rate
from these top shale fields increased by 26%. These massive
decline rates are the very reason the shale oil and gas companies are
struggling to make money. A perfect example of this is PXD,
Pioneer Resources. Pioneer is the largest shale oil producer in
the Permian. According to Pioneer’s Q1 2018 Report:
Producing 260 thousand barrels oil equivalent per day (MBOEPD) in the Permian Basin, an increase of 9 MBOEPD, or 3%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2017; first quarter Permian Basin production was at the top end of Pioneer’s production guidance range of 252 MBOEPD to 260 MBOEPD; as previously announced, freezing temperatures in early January resulted in production losses of approximately 6 MBOEPD; Permian Basin oil production increased to 170 thousand barrels of oil per day (MBOPD); 63 horizontal wells were placed on production.
Pioneer
spent $818 million on capital expenditures (CapEx) for additions to
oil and gas properties (drilling and completion costs) during Q1
2018, brought on 63 horizontal wells in the Permian, and only added
9,000 barrels per day of oil equivalent over the previous quarter.
So, how much Free Cash Flow did Pioneer make with oil prices at the
highest level in almost four years?? Well, you’re not going
to believe me… so here is Pioneer’s Cash Flow Statement below:
Pioneer
reported $554 million in cash from operations and spent $818 million
drilling and completing oil wells in the Permian and a few other
locations. Thus, Pioneer’s Free Cash Flow was a negative $264
million. However, Pioneer spent an additional $51 million for
additions to other assets and other property and equipment shown
right below the RED highlighted line for a total of $869 million
in total CapEx spending. Total net free cash flow for Pioneer
is -$315 million if we include the additional $51 million.
Therefore,
the largest shale oil producer in the Permian spent $264 million more
than they made from operations drilling 63 new wells in the Permian
and only added a net 9,000 barrels per day of oil equivalent.
Now, how economical is that???
How
long can this insanity go on??
If
we look at the Free Cash Flow for some of the top shale energy
companies in Q1 2018, here is the result:
Of
the ten shale companies in the chart above (in order: Continental,
EOG, Whiting, Concho, Marathon, Oasis, Occidental, Hess, Apache &
Pioneer), only three enjoyed positive free cash flow, while seven
suffered negative free cash flow losses. The
net result of the group was a negative $455 million in free cash
flow.
Even
with higher oil prices, the U.S. shale energy companies are still
struggling to make money.
So,
the question remains. What happens to these shale oil companies
when the oil price falls back towards $30 when the stock market drops
by 50+% over the next few years?? And how is the U.S. Shale
Energy Industry going to pay back the $250+ billion in debt??
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.