Posts
Hillary’s
Secret Letter and the Whole Matter of Endless War and the Almost
Complete Corruption of America’s Government (UPDATED!)
3
June, 2016
Foreword
by the Saker: to be
honest, I have not been following the latest presidential race in the
USA. Simply put, I have long lost any hope to see any change
come from any election in the USA. Changing the puppet makes no
difference as long as the puppeteer remains the same one.
Still, I think that there are at least two main puppeteers in the
USA: what I call the “Old Anglo” guard and the Neocons. And
while these two agree on a lot, there are some real differences
between them. For all my loathing for Obama, I have to admit
that he generally has kept the Neocons in check, at least one some
crucial matters such as the deal with Iran or the war on Syria.
It is because of this awareness of the difference between extremely
bad and absolutely unspeakably horrible that I make any difference at
all, however minor, between the current presidential candidates.
And when I speak of “absolutely unspeakably horrible” I, of
course, mean that thoroughly evil and maniacal bitch Hillary Clinton
who, frankly, outright frightens me. Of all the people
seriously thinking that that Russia will not dare to stand up to the
AngloZionist Empire, she is, in my opinion, by far the most dangerous
and thus the most likely to test that hypothesis. So while
“thoroughly evil and maniacal bitch” might sound harsh, I quite
literally mean that she is breathing evil and hubris and that she is
a “bitch” in the colloquial sense of the word. God help us
all and have mercy on us if she becomes the next President. If
that happens I would consider the risks of a nuclear war with Russia
as high.
When
I saw the following article at our friends at the Greanville Post I
knew that I had to repost it here. While hardly a proof of
anything in the sense of legal evidentiary rules, this article offers
a fascinating insight into the depraved and wicked mind of Hillary
Clinton. It also fits perfectly with her infamous “we came,
we saw, he died”:
So
yes, at this point, I would prefer *anybody* to this “thoroughly
evil and maniacal bitch”. If she gets elected my last hope
will be for a coup by the JCS.
The
Saker
UPDATE:
I just go an email which said the following:
Maybe
you need to research a bit more the validity of this supposed second
letter of Hillary’s. It seems that the road leads to:
http://www.theisraelidaily.com/clinton-to-donor-in-next-war-i-will-let-israel-kill-200000-not-just-2000-gazans/
and,
in turn, to:
These
are self-described satirical sites.
I
did not find this letter on the Guardian, or any reliable site.
So
– CAVEAT EMPTOR
(if I found out more I will let you know).
Hillary
Clinton and Haim Saban in June 2015. News,
Reviews, and Views.
An
almost perfect measure of the decay of democratic values in American
politics is found in a letter from Hillary Clinton to Haim Saban, a
wealthy American-Israeli and a major contributor to the Democrats. It
is a letter whose only purpose is to elicit funds, ingratiating its
author to the recipient by condemning the perfectly legitimate right
of free people to choose boycotting Israel over its appalling
behaviors. The letter is disturbing in some of its views and
characterizations, but it has been reviewed and remarked upon by
many, as here.
We
were not supposed to know this, but there are actually two letters.
The first letter was released by its recipient, but the second letter
was intended only for its recipient’s eyes. Somehow, it managed to
be leaked to The Guardian, although in searching the Internet to
discover just what happened it seems Google has done a pretty good
job of sweeping over the tail.
It
is the second letter, the one we were not supposed to see, which goes
beyond being disturbing.
I
am not exaggerating when I characterize it as something comparable to
words which might have been written by… well, choose the name of
any grisly dictator, but Adolf Hitler’s would have to be the one
jumping to the minds of most people. This second letter’s words are
absolutely chilling. If you think I’m exaggerating, here are
Hillary’s words:
“Quite
frankly, Israel didn’t teach Hamas a harsh enough lesson last year.
True to form, Obama was too hard on our democratic ally, and too soft
on our Islamofascist foe.
“As
president, I will give the Jewish state all the necessary military,
diplomatic, economic and moral support it needs to truly vanquish
Hamas – and if that means killing 200,000 Gazans, then so be it.
“We
realist Democrats understand that collateral damage is an unavoidable
by-product of the War on Terror, and me being a mother, grandmother
and tireless children’s rights advocate does not mean that I will
flinch even one iota in allowing Israel to obliterate every last
school-cum-rocket launching pad in Gaza. Those who allow their
children to be used as human shields for terrorists deserve to see
them buried under one-ton bombs.”
Let’s
just analyze a few of the more unacceptable and repugnant statements
in this letter.
“Israel
didn’t teach Hamas a harsh enough lesson…”
In
2014, Israel killed over 500 children plus another 1,700 adults in
Gaza, and that came after another invasion, 2008, and a series of
operations beginning in 2006, which saw Israel kill more than another
1,500 Palestinians. It should be noted that the Palestinian
population is a young one, so a disproportion of children is always
at risk in any attack. We had reliable reports that Israeli soldiers
grabbed Palestinian children to hold in front of them in a number of
instances. We also had first-hand reports of families being targeted.
Over
this period, Israel has maintained a brutal blockade of Gaza, which
in its first inception included an actual calorie count for the
amount of food which could just keep a person alive, an idea we might
want to credit to Himmler. International pressure brought an end to
that aspect of the blockade, but even today the Palestinians cannot
get cement to repair their sanitation and homes. Israel also launched
its infamous Gaza flotilla raid in 2010, seizing half a dozen ships
attempting to bring aid to Gaza and killing 10 crew members, all of
them unarmed.
I
remind readers just what Gaza is. It is essentially a huge refugee
camp, a place where Palestinians huddled for protection from Israel’s
1948 terror campaign against residents of ancient villages long since
bulldozed out of existence. Today, surrounded by fences and guards
and towers with automated, radar-operated machine-guns, Gaza
resembles a vast outdoor prison, or, if you will, a Bantustan or
concentration camp. Even its fishermen are allowed to go only a short
distance into the sea before being attacked by Israeli gun boats.
Periodically, Israel does dirty work like cut its power or foul its
water. Recently, a huge swath of land around its perimeter was
sprayed with herbicides, cutting food supplies and insuring future
malformation of children, just as we see in Vietnam as a result of
America’s use of Agent Orange.
“…our
democratic ally…”
Israel
is certainly one of the world’s strangest “democracies.” About
half the people living under its rule do not want to live under its
rule, have no votes, have absolutely no rights, and are treated in
the most abusive manner. Even their homes are not their own with
Israel periodically seizing them for its own purposes.
Then
we have the fact that only Jews are supposed to live in “the Jewish
state.” Only Jews are welcomed. Indeed only Jews are accepted.
Other kinds of refugees are turned away. There is a government
program underway right now to clean out the Knesset, Israel’s
legislature, of its few Arab members. These are the representatives
of Arabs trapped in what became Israel in 1948 and reluctantly
granted citizenship, although in daily practice and in many laws,
Arab citizens are not deemed as full citizens, identity papers are
stamped and they are subjected to hearing regular demagogic demands
that they all be pushed across the Jordan River and out of the
country.
If
you consider Israel a genuine democracy, then you must also view the
American Confederacy or South Africa under the National Party as
democracies. They both held elections and had legislatures and the
dress-up appearances of democracy. It was just that huge numbers of
those countries’ people could not vote and could not own certain
property and had no rights.
Israel’s
so-called democracy has other serious impairments, including a
structure for the role of money in politics that much resembles
America’s. It is at best a plutocracy. Millions pour in to favored
candidates like Netanyahu from sources like American billionaire
Sheldon Adelson.
Israel
has another highly undemocratic characteristic, and that is its
aversion to democracy in countries or groups anywhere near it. It
always has supported happily tyrants like Mubarak in Egypt and has
worked assiduously to get what was a democratic organization like
Hamas declared and treated as some kind of terrorists.
If
Israel is, as Israelis like to say, the Middle East’s only
democracy, I think we can be glad there are not more such
мemocracies.
“…our
Islamofascist foe…”
Since
when are the Palestinians – who, as is often ignored, include both
Islamic and Christian people – “our foe”? I don’t recall them
threatening or attacking anyone? Women and children and hard-working
men on farms and in shops are our foe? People without even the
semblance of a military?
Since
when are they “Islamofascists”? They are just people driven out
of their own ancient homes and farms by groups of well-armed
newcomers from Europe and America. And what is an “Islamofascist,”
beyond a slur term coined in Israel for people who are resented,
hated, and abused merely for the fact of their very existence? We did
briefly see in the last assault on Gaza how ugly things get in
Israel, something generally kept from our eyes, with video of
Israelis in lawn chairs on the heights watching homes being bombed
and cheering as though it were the home team scoring a goal at a
football match.
“I
will give the Jewish state all the necessary military, diplomatic,
economic and moral support it needs to truly vanquish Hamas…”
What
in God’s name does that mean? America literally pours military,
security, and technical assistance into Israel. There is continuous
typhoon of it hitting Israel’s shores. And how would more help
“truly vanquish Hamas”? What would be the shape of that? A couple
of thermonuclear weapons lobbed into Gaza? But Israel already has its
own thermonuclear weapons, albeit through lying and deceit and even
theft and against the intent of all international law and
organization, although with the secret contrivance and acceptance of
a couple of generations of politicians like Hillary.
Why
should Hamas be vanquished? It was elected to office in a clean
election, likely cleaner than most American and Israeli elections.
But I forget, Israel hates having democracies anywhere near its
borders. It prefers dealing with – when it deigns even to speak to
its neighbors – men like Mahmoud Abbas, who last legally held
office in 2009 and has unilaterally extended his own term as
President ever since, and who is completely ineffectual in his
relations with Israel.
We shouldn’t forget that after Hamas’s internationally-supervised election, Israeli troops raced into Gaza and illegally arrested many of its elected officials. It also publicly threatened the leader’s assassination. Funny, but I don’t recall things going the other way from this supposedly terrorist organization. After all, it earned the “official” designation as terrorist from politicians like Hillary Clinton or Newt Gingrich or Dick Armey working to keep those pro-Israeli campaign funds flowing in.
All
of the horrors of invasions, bombardments, and blockades came after
that simple election. Israel hates Hamas because it does not do
exactly as it is ordered to do. Always the excuse is used that Hamas
won’t recognize Israel as “the Jewish state,” but that view
deliberately hides many legitimate issues. In conflict or
disagreement, countries typically do not extend formal recognition.
The United States has done this countless times, including for the
last half century with Cuba. It did it for years with the Soviet
Union.
But
Israel’s case is not just a matter of formal recognition. There is
a subtle but immensely important difference. It wants recognition as
“the Jewish state.” What would happen to those million or so
Palestinians who hold Israeli passports and are now at least
nominally Israelis? Forced marches across the Jordan River? What
happens to the many important Palestinian claims on Israel? What
claims do you think a non-Jew can have in “a Jewish state” under
purely Jewish courts and laws? What happens to the entire West Bank,
which exists under Israeli occupation and is regularly predated by
sudden demands for non-Jewish properties? This is no simple issue as
Israel repeatedly and tiresomely insists that it is.
You
are not a terrorist because you refuse to accept Israel’s terms:
you are a people looking out for your own interests, something all
people have the right and need to do. Israel always insists that this
acceptance come before any other matters can be dealt with, and it
then turns to the press and says, “See, I told you, they are
terrorists.” Simply absurd, expecting people to just lie down
and let you do whatever you want to them!
“…and
if that means killing 200,000 Gazans, then so be it…”
Only
a person so exceedingly biased towards Israel as to be effectively
blind would fail to recognize the tone of those words. They could
easily have been written by Adolf Hitler or one his charming goons
such as Heinrich Himmler or Joseph Goebbels.
In
the churches and schools where I was brought up, such speech could
never be countenanced, yet here it is, written by a woman who was
Secretary of State now wants to be President. She obviously knows
enough to keep this morally-filthy language secret, hence her method
of the second letter. So, even in her, maybe there is some little
remaining sense of shame? But I doubt it because she is writing these
ghastly words for what purpose? To ask for a large amount of money.
Now,
if you wrote words like that in Israel or in a number of countries,
only changing the name of who are to be killed in mass, you would
most certainly go to prison, besides being labelled a terrorist for
life. Apparently, when Hillary learned that this letter leaked, she
made the excuse that there had been a typo, that it should have read
“20,000.” Her moral and ethical organs are so charred and twisted
that she actually thinks 20,000 people killed sounds okay, just fine,
maybe ten times as good as killing 200,000?
But
of course, Hillary is grotesquely lying even in this excuse, as she
has lied innumerable times over her adult life, an ongoing stage play
we have all enjoyed in the news: watching her defend her predatory
husband for the sake of future political success, watching her
politically-motivated statement of being shot at in Bosnia in 1996, a
claim almost instantly proved fraudulent by the press, watching her
squirm and lie about what really happened during the murderous events
at Benghazi, and watching her lie as she is investigated about using
her private server for top secret material as Secretary of State.
“Those
who allow their children to be used as human shields for terrorists
deserve to see them buried under one-ton bombs”
This
statement is so sick and twisted, it is frightening. It begs the
whole genuine issue of whether any Palestinian ever did this, while
we know from witnesses that Israeli soldiers did. Just what is it
here that we are talking about where children are said to have been
used as shields? A full-fledged invasion by heavily-armed troops,
supported with tanks and artillery and fighter planes into a
densely-crowded civilian area, often aptly described as an open-air
prison for a million and a half souls. How could children avoid
becoming targets? In the poor places of the Middle East with their
high birth rates, children are a greater portion of the population
than in advanced countries. Only a genuine monster would launch such
an invasion, and only an equal monster would defend it.
To
my mind, this damnable behavior of Israel’s could be compared to,
say, the Detroit Police Department, supported by the Michigan
National Guard, invading the ghettos of Detroit to capture a few
criminals and killing literally thousands of innocent people in the
process and leaving the place a pile of rubble. The whole world would
be appalled. But even that comparison is inadequate. Israel was not
chasing criminals. What Israel was really hoping to do was murder the
leaders of Hamas, a legitimate political party. But even if Hamas
were not a legitimate party, Israel’s act is comparable to
Detroit’s police and National Guard killing thousands to try
getting a few members of the Black Panther Party in the 1970s.
We’ve
surmised that things like this letter go on in private because we see
our politicians countenancing mass murder and we see the entire
Middle East in flames owing to the same cause. But having the paper
in hand is another matter. For instance, we know Newt Gingrich
received the best part of $20 million for his last nomination
campaign from billionaire Sheldon Adelson and proceeded to make
campaign speeches about there being “no such thing as a
Palestinian.”
We
know former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, a man whose career was
well financed by special interests, actually said in the late part of
his career that Israel should just sweep all the Palestinians out of
the country.
We
know that former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said in
response to a question about 500,000 deaths of children in Iraq, “We
think the price is worth it,” and does anyone wonder why Albright
not only strongly supports Hillary but recently spoke of “a special
place in hell for women” who didn’t support Hillary?
It tells us a great deal of the lengths to which an American politician will go to secure large sources of funds. It tells us too something about her relationship with the recipient that Hillary believed she could freely address him in such an appalling fashion. Finally, it confirms everyone’s worst fears about the Israel Lobby and the extremes to which its supporters are prepared to go.
We
all know there is a huge amount of behind-the-scenes, dirty dealing
in American politics, but not just in politics, in foreign affairs.
There is no other explanation for the murky, bloody swamp into which
America’s government has towed the country. America has been
continuously at war for a quarter century. It has killed great
numbers of people and destroyed whole societies. And none of those
people threatened the United States, not even the Taleban who were
arbitrarily and without proof held responsible for the events of
9/11.
Virtually
all of it relates directly or indirectly to Israel and making the
Middle East comfortable for a state which itself never hesitates to
threaten, attack, kill, imprison, torture to gain its objectives, its
objectives being to enlarge itself far beyond its original accepted
boundaries, to reduce the native Palestinian population of millions
to such miserable discomfort that they flee their homes, and to
assure itself of hegemony throughout the region, seeing
independent-minded leaders like Assad or Gadhafi literally murdered
and their countries torn apart.
It is a program which parallels closely historical examples which none of us has been taught to admire or approve, historical examples which have caused great wars and massive human misery. We have established some of our greatest international institutions precisely out of the wreckage of history with the aim of not letting it happen again, but today every one of these institutions is compromised by American pressure on Israel’s behalf, the work of corrupt politicians like Hillary Clinton.
So
it is happening again, although on a smaller scale – though I
wouldn’t want the job of explaining to the people of Syria, Iraq,
Libya, Egypt, and a number of other places that their desolation and
misery are on a smaller scale.
The
present Secretary General doesn’t even peep at America’s many
appalling acts. Past Secretaries General who managed to get elected
despite their opposition to American imperialism – an example was
Boutros Boutros-Ghali – were removed in behind-the-scenes plots.
Madeleine Albright for example won her State Department spurs
arranging just that kind of thing. Combinations of threats and bribes
do the job nicely, and, of course, the UN hasn’t forgotten the long
period of time the United States simply refused to pay its
treaty-required dues, a quarter of the institution’s budget.
But
ordinary Americans and others rarely get even a peek at any of the
details going into the shaping of their world. Here is one small
instance where they do, and it is a telling one.
Editor’s
Note. Hillary is not the only one friendly with Saba.
John
Chuckman lives in Canada and is former chief economist for a large
Canadian oil company. He is a lifelong student of history. He writes
with a passionate desire for honesty, the rule of reason, and concern
for human decency. His first book has just been published, The
Decline of the American Empire and the Rise of China as a Global
Power, published by Constable and Robinson, London. He blogs at :
Chuckman’s Choice of Words”
HTML
code for ASIN : 1608880583
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.