Following
on from the interview with Mark Austin on Nature Bats Last and
subsequent discussions a reader has pointed out the following which
comes from a book written by an early member of the Peak Oil
movement, Matt Savinar, “The Oil Age is over: What to Expect as
the World Runs Out of Cheap Oil, 2005-2015”, written way back
in 2004.
Matt
was talking about Peak Oil and energy decline and was positing
depopulation as a result.
More
reflections on bioweapons and depopulation
What
types of weapons are being developed for these oil wars?
The
US has been investing massive sums of money in biological weapons
research during the past four years, redirecting up to $10 billion
toward projects related to biological weapons such as anthrax. The
Pentagon's budget for chemical and biological defence has doubled;
high security nuclear weapons labs have begun conducting genetic
research on dangerous pathogens; universities are receiving
government funding to build high tech lab is equipped to handle
thirdly infectious organisms; and for Detrick, Maryland, once the
home of American secret bioweapons program, is about to break
ground onto new high -tech biodefense centres. Officials say the
effort is designed to head off what a recent CIA report calls the
"darker bioweapons future."
Those
who have read the PNAC's proposal "Rebuilding America's
defenses," know exactly what these officials mean when they say
"darker." On page 60, the proposal states the US will
develop "new methods of attack, advanced forms of biological
warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological
warfare from the realm of terror to apolitically useful tool."
In other words, they are developing weapons that target
certain ethnic groups. For the record, PNAC has posted a notice
on their website that they find being accused of endorsing genocide
to be appalling. While they may not enjoy being accused of it the plain language of their proposal indicates they feel it would be
useful.
Don't
feel left out if you happen to be white: North Korea is rumoured to
be developing an "ethnic bomb" at targets whites only.
In
light of these plans, it is particularly disturbing that shortly
after 9-11, many of the world's best microbiologist began mysteriously
turning up dead. Between November 2001 and March 2002, 15 world-class
microbiologists mysteriously died. Many of them were world leaders in
developing weapons-grade biological plagues. Others, the best in figuring out how to top millions from dying of biologiocal weapons. Still others, experts in
the theories of bioterrorism. Of course, it could all be coincidence,
but given the bizarre manner in which many have died and the fact
that each one was at the top of their respective fields, that is
unlikely.
Would
our leaders actually deploy these horrific weapons, how could they
rationalise something so terrible?
Simple,
in less than 20 years, the self-regulating market system will have "run
out of gas" and vanished. With the market system gone, the
ruling elites will fall back on the good old-fashioned means of
control: a police state. In the US alone, 200 million guns and
private ownership guarantee that this police state quickly evolve
into rebellion and anarchy.
If
the anarchy scenario were to reach its natural conclusion, the
global elite would be eliminated by the angry masses. Those who
managed to escape would die more mIserably than the poor they are
unsuited for day-to-day survival because they have lived their lives
like queen bees.
Once
this scenario becomes inevitable, the elites will simply depopulate
most of the planet with a bioweapon. It will be the only logical
solution to the problem. It's a first-strike tactic that leaves the
infrastructure and other species in place and allows the elites to perpetuate their own genes into the foreseeable future: "War
is a male reproductive strategy. All that is needed for the strategy
to evolve is that aggressors fight and win more often than they
lose."
The
global genocide will be rationalised as a second chance for humanity
– a new Garden of Eden - A new Genesis. The temptation will prove
irresistible:
"Strangelove
said, ‘Offhand, I should say that in addition to the factors of
use, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross-section of
necessary skills, It would be absolutely vital that our top
government and military men be included, to foster and in part
required principles of leadership and tradition.’
"The
arrow have not missed its mark, and around the table there was an
outbreak of sober, nodding heads. Attention was concentrated more
than ever on Dr. Strangelove.
"Strangelove
went on. ‘Naturally they were breed prodigiously,eh? There would be
much time and little to do. With the proper breeding techniques,
and starting with the ratio of, say, 10 women to each man, I would
estimate the progeny of the original group of 200,000 would emerge a hundred years later as well over 100 million…’"
Look
at the situation from their perspective, What are the solution is
there? Keep in mind that the people making the decisions about these
things are all former energy and defense industry executives. What
you and I call a "Holocaust" they would call "downsizing."
If you have not yet heard it here is the interview:
If you have not yet heard it here is the interview:
It seems far more likely that a form of weaponized anthrax would escape a lab due to human error than some plot by rich Wall Street Bankers. The Waltons may have made billions short-changing their workers, and even though they already live in underground bunkers none of them appear to be smart enough nor with enough imagination to devise a human targeting disease bomb. And that goes for the whole sorry mess of the billionaire class. They are a lot more like Donald Trump than Dr Strangelove which is one of the reasons we're so fucking screwed now. A much more clever plan, and one that would provide for people still willing to work the fields, run the mills and protect the 'Queen Bees' can be found in UTOPIA, a clip of which is here: https://youtu.be/87F2jX5Qk2Y
ReplyDeleteYOUTUBE record of Bill Gates sponsored a panel in Arizona State University's Biotech department that took place on February 2, 2012, the inventor of genetically engineered edible vaccines joked about wiping out 25% of the population with a genetically engineered virus.
DeleteDr. Charles Arntzen, head of The Biodesign Institute for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, responded to a question pertaining to whether feeding the 8 billion people of the world was worth it, or whether population reduction should be pursued.
The scientist quipped: "Has anybody seen 'Contagion'? That's the answer! Go out and use genetic engineering to create a better virus... 25 percent of the population is supposed to go in Contagion."
Arntzen was the first to pursue an edible vaccine for use in the developing world while at the Boyce Thompson Institute in 1996 under funding from the Rockefeller Foundation. His signature delivery vehicle is the banana. He noted the possibilities for its use in both poor countries as well as the wealthier Western world: "Children of developing countries may not be the only beneficiaries of this new technology. Says Arntzen: 'American kids will also probably prefer being vaccinated by an edible vaccine rather than by a needle.'"
Perhaps even more startling is the fact that Dr. Arntzen -- and perhaps some of his colleagues in the room -- developed the first effective, stable and storable synthetic Ebola vaccine capable of being stockpiled under grants from the Department of Defense and Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. According to a news report from Arizona State University: "If early efforts bear fruit, an Ebola vaccine could be stockpiled for use in the United States, should the country fall victim to a natural outbreak or a bioterrorism event in which a weaponized strain of the virus were unleashed on soldiers or the public."
If not downright creepy and nihilistic, it is surely poor bedside manner to joke about depopulating the masses of the planet via an engineered virus when he and his department are actively involved in tinkering with such stuff.
The Ebola vaccine, while overtly for defensive measures, is the natural research companion to weaponized Ebola viruses that have been refined over the years by military researchers, including those in the United States, and classified as a Class A bioweapon.
PUBLIC LAW 105—85—NOV. 18, 1997: USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
ReplyDeleteSEC. 1078. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.
(a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans.
Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a).
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire.
The Following Should Also Be Noted
The term "biological agent" as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:
Quote:
(e) BIOLOGICAL AGENT DEFINED.—In this section, the term
‘‘biological agent’’ means any micro-organism (including bacteria,
viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance,
and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized
component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable
of causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a
human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or
materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environment. The term "deleterious alteration of the environment" applies to all radioactive elements - See more at: http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/10/nuclear-dump-fire-epa-shuts-off-not.html#sthash.Nkv7cuC9.dpuf