Planet
of Fear
Pepe
ESCOBAR
19
january, 2016
Facing
the gleaming Doha skyline on a Persian Gulf winter carries the merit
of a panoramic perspective. Most nations around it are going
into melt down and the remaining ones – with the exception of Iran
– exhibit neither the political leadership nor the economic and
institutional infrastructure to do anything other than to meekly
accept whatever tsunami hits their shores. They are nothing but
scared spectators.
The
Empire of Chaos has enough warmongering hardware pre-positioned
within spitting distance to turn the whole of Southwest Asia into
ashes – as a gaggle of usual suspects in the Beltway, neocon or
neoliberalcon, still can’t find a cure to their itching to «really
win the next war» in a sort of exponential Shock and Awe.
Fear
reigns supreme. Jim Rickards, the author of Currency
Wars, economist
and CIA asset, has just released a new book, The
Big Drop, with
a pretty grim message. For his part Jim
Rogers,
a.k.a. the «Sage of Singapore», most of the time China-bound
informing the Chinese elite where to place their investments, holds
on to a nuanced perspective on the West blaming all the current
global economy turmoil on China.
According
to Rogers, «yes,
China is slowing. But mostly the world is doing so. Japan, one of
China’s largest trading partners is officially in recession. Much
of Europe is worse. The US stock market was down in 2015 while the
Chinese stock market was one of the strongest in the world».
Rogers
adds, «things
are going to get worse worldwide so everyone will suffer and is to
‘blame’. The original source is the US Federal Reserve and its
ludicrous, artificial interest rates caused by massive money printing
which the world has copied. Throw in staggering debt increases by the
US government [which the world has also copied] and there will soon
be hell to pay».
So
no wonder apocalyptic war rumors are the new normal – even as old
timers boost their case for «only» a «good old-fashioned world
war», as if nuclear exchanges wouldn’t be part of the equation. A
few sound minds in the Atlanticist axis worry that if Il Duce Trump
wins the next US presidential election, that translates into
guaranteed bankruptcy for the US, and – what else – war if Il
Trumpissimo implements half of what he’s boasting about
Short
all the oil you can
The
Davos annual talkfest is about to begin; that’s one of those
occasions when the Masters of the Universe – who usually decide
everything behind closed doors – send their minions to «debate»
the future of their holdings. The current debate centers on whether
we are still in the midst of the Third – digitalized – Industrial
Revolution and
the Internet of Things or whether we’re already entering the FouŃrth.
In
the real world though all the cackle is about the age of
old-fashioned oil. Which brings us to the myriad effects of the cheap
oil strategy deployed by the House of Saud under Washington’s
command.
Persian
Gulf traders, off the record, are adamant that there is no longer any
real global oil surplus of consequence as all shut-in oil has been
dumped on the market based on that Washington command.
Petroleum
Intelligence Weekly estimates the surplus is at a maximum 2.2
million a day, plus 600,000 barrels a day coming from Iran later this
year. The US consumption of oil – at 19,840,000 barrels a day, 20%
of world production – has not increased; it’s the other 80% that
have been mostly absorbing the dumped oil.
Some
key Persian Gulf traders are adamant that oil should be surging by
the second half of 2016. That explains why Russia is not panicking
with oil plunging towards $30 a barrel. Moscow is very much aware of
the «partners» that are carrying oil market manipulation against
Russia, and at the same time is anticipating this won’t last too
long.
That
explains why Russia's Deputy Finance Minister Maxim Oreshkin issued a
sort of «keep calm and carry on» message; he expects oil prices to
remain in the $40-60 range for at least the next seven years, and
Russia can live with that.
The
Masters of the Universe – just like the Russians – have realized
their oil manipulation cannot last. Hysteria, predictably, took over.
That’s why they ordered major Wall Street firms to short oil using
cash settlement. Compliant US corporate media was ordered to spin the
shortfalls will last forever. The target is to drive down the price
of a barrel of oil to $7 if possible.
The
original Masters of the Universe strategy would eventually lead to
regime change in Russia and the usual oligarch suspects back in the
saddle re-conducting the massive looting operation Russia suffered
during the 1990s.
A
fearful House of Saud is a mere pawn in this strategy. Assuming the
plan would work, the House of Saud under – virtually demented –
King Salman, now confined to a room in his Riyadh palace, would also
be regime-changed, via Saudi military officers trained in the West
and recruited by Western agents. As a bonus, the Islamic Republic of
Iran would also collapse, with «moderates» (rebels?) taking
control.
So
the Masters of the Universe strategy essentially boils down to
regime-change in Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, leading to
Exceptionalistan-friendly elites/vassals; in sum, the ultimate
chapter in the global Resource Wars. Yet what this is yielding so far
is the House of Saud having absolutely no clue of what may happen to
them; Riyadh royals may think that they are undermining both Iran and
Russia, but in the end they may be only accelerating their own
demise.
Losing
my religion
In
Europe, it’s as if we’re back to 1977 when The Stranglers sang No
More Heroes. Now, no more heroes and no more ideals. Even as some of
European youth’s best and brightest have tried to fight the immense
violence of neoliberalism, via alter-globalization, the poorest among
the young are now mired in violence and suicidal nihilism – extreme
Wahhabism which they've learned online. Yet this has nothing to do
with Islam, and it’s not a war of religion, as myriad extreme-right
parties across Europe routinely insist.
All
across the spectrum, driven by fear, the toxic mix of political and
economic instability continues to spread, leading quite a few
insiders to wonder whether both the Fed and the Politburo Standing
Committee in Beijing don't really know what’s happening.
And
that once again feeds the warmongering hordes, for which that «good
old-fashioned world war» is the easiest ticket out. Cancel all the
old debt; issue loads of new debt; turn ploughshares and iPhones into
cannons. And after a little thermonuclear exchange, welcome to full
employment and a new (waste)land of opportunity.
It’s
in this context that, under the volcano, surfaces an essay by Guido
Preparata, an Italian-American political economist now based as a
scholar in the Vatican. In The Political Economy of
Hyper-Modernity, soon to appear in an anthology published by
Palgrave/Macmillan, Preparata offers an account of the last 70 years
of US/international monetary dynamics/history by using a single
indicator: the overall US balance of payments – which has not been
released since 1975.
Yet
the most important conclusion in the essay seems to be that «the
neoliberal engine, which has had to run mostly on domestic fuel, has
shown… appreciable resilience». The
US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, «together» managed to erect
a «wall
of money».
And
yet «US
technocrats seem to have grown disillusioned with the neoliberal
machine». So, «as
a momentous alternative, the technocrats have called for some kind of
‘global rebalancing’». The
US-led system «seems to be transitioning to a neo-mercantilist
regime». And the answer is the TPP (The Trans-Pacific
Partnership) and the TTIP (The Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership) trade agreements that, together, «will
place the United States at the center of an open trade zone
representing around two-thirds of global economic output».
This
would imply, ultimately, a sort of Make Trade, Not War endgame. So
why so much fear? That’s because in the internal battle raging
among the Masters of the Universe, the freewheeling neoliberalcons
have not yet imprinted the last word. So beware the Falcons of War
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.