Where did ISIS fighters go to before the battle of Ramadi? The United States is imposing radical changes on Baghdad
By Elijah J. Magnier
30 December, 2015
Published
article here: via @AlraiMediaGroup
Iraqi
Army, the Counter Terrorism units, the Federal police, and Anbar
tribes entered the city of Ramadi that was occupied by the
self-proclaimed “Islamic State” group (ISIS) for several months.
To their biggest surprise, only few bodies of the terrorist group
were found when intelligence gathering by the U.S led coalition and
the Iraqi intelligence service confirmed the presence of around 2000
fighters in the city until days before the final assault. Six ISIS
were arrested while trying to flee Ramadi among the 442 civilians who
left the city one day before the final assault on the city center.
The
same phenomena of “ISIS evaporation” was registered in Sinjar
when 7500 Kurds, supported by the U.S Air Force, occupied the key
northern Iraqi city, finding a very small number of ISIS fighters in
it.
So
where did all these ISIS fighters go too?
A
high-ranking source within the Iraqi government told me “the US
forces operating in Iraq within the military operation room in
Baghdad are the one who define the units and the time (day and hour)
of attack against ISIS. If we want to benefit from an Air Force to
defeat the terrorist group, we should bow to the American command. It
is not unlikely for a possible American – Turkish coordination to
communicate with “ISIS” and give a free way out to fighters to
withdraw in the direction of the Syrian – Iraqi borders. That’s
the information our drones collected in the last few days prior the
attack of Ramadi. Our signal and Human Intelligence informed the
Americans and us about ISIS movement of troops. We were not allowed
to engage against these and no one in the government can contradict
the Americans for the moment. The U.S ordered Baghdad to keep
al-Hashd al-Sha’bi (PMUs) away from the battlefield of Anbar
perhaps to ensure a free passage to ISIS and to reduce the Iranian
influence and credit of victories in Iraq”.
“America
has asked decision makers in Baghdad to change the heads of
anti-terrorism, intelligence and security services of the army and
Interior Ministry. Moreover, the Secretary General of the Council of
Minister was also kind of suggested by the Americans and in
consequences he has been appointed to this position. The U.S wants a
homogeneous team that is friendly to its policy and presence of these
(US forces) on the ground in Iraq. The hostile Era – created by the
former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki that led to a withdrawal of the
forces from Mesopotamia – is over and the policy adopted at the
moment consists in reducing the influence of the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani over few
Iraqi armed groups. What is contributing to the success of such a
policy is the fact that the Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi is in a
bad terms with Soleimani. Since the start, PM Abadi believed that
Soleimani was planning to remove him from power, supporting al-Maliki
and promoting other choices to replace the actual Premier”, said
the source.
The
source concluded:”Iran controls various military organisations
fighting within the Popular Mobilisation Units strongly present in
the battlefield in Iraq and in Syria. Such an influence convinced
al-Abadi to choose the path that leads to ” Uncle Sam ” instead
of choosing the one of Welayat-el- faqih. This is why Abadi rejected,
following an explicit American demand, to reject any Russia military
assistance in the air, in Iraq, unlike the Syrian President Bashar
al-Assad. The Iraqi Prime Ministre is aware of the possibility that
the U.S would like to see 3 Iraqi cantons, one for the Kurds, one for
the Sunni and another one for the Shia. The Americans are also
supporting the Turkish presence in Iraq, to meet the say of the
French Intelligence Service director who said: The Middle East will
never be the same as before. What is becoming more clear now that
ISIS is a toy used by players for their agenda and plans to reshuffle
the map of the Middle East”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.