Doctors
Publicly Call for Residents to EVACUATE Los Angeles, Chatsworth,
Northridge and Granada Hills, CA over Toxic Fumes from Well Leak
5
January, 2016
Doctors
in Los Angeles are urging people exposed to a gas leak from a broken
natural gas well, to EVACUATE THE AREA to stop breathing toxic
fumes.
According
to health professionals, hundreds of citizens are suffering severe
effects from breathing methane and volatile chemical carbons in gases
being released from underground from a cracked natural gas well on
the Porter Ranch in the Aliso CCanyon outside of Los Angeles.
Symptoms range from nose bleeds, to swollen throats, to difficulty
breathing, to respiratory distress, then failure, then cardiac
arrest. Doctors are now publicly telling citizens "get
out."
Officials
confirm this is the largest natural gas leak ever recorded and
that it is jeopardizing health and causing evacuations for
thousands of Southern California residents… Methane is estimated to
be leaking out of the Aliso Canyon site at a rate of about 62 million
standard cubic feet, per day… it’s potentially
devastating on a planetary scale…
This is what the cracked gas well looks like; two large holes in the
ground:
Erin
Brockovich,
Dec 21, 2015: “The enormity of the Aliso Canyon gas leak cannot be
overstated… and it shows no sign of stopping… According to tests
conducted in November by the California Air Resources Board, the leak
is spewing 50,000 kilograms of gas per hour — the equivalent to
the strength
of a volcanic eruption.”
Here's what it looks like in infra-red:
The Express, Dec 30, 2015: Thousands suffer nose bleeds and vomiting during ‘worst environmental disaster since BP’ — An invisibleenvironmental disaster which has been compared to the 2010 Gulf of Mexico BP oil spill has forced thousands of people from their homes… with nosebleeds, headaches and nausea, after millions of kilograms of invisible methane was released into the air… Residents claim the gas, which has drifted into surrounding neighborhoods, is making them suffer from nausea, nosebleeds, and headaches
Voice
of America:
Residents have suffered symptoms that include “nausea, abdominal
discomfort, dizziness, light-headedness, some shortness of breath …
even some nosebleeds,” said medical toxicologist Cyrus Rangan of
the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health… scientists are
monitoring levels of benzene, a known cancer-causing agent… “We
want to be sure that we are monitoring every single day because we’ve
got a lot of ever-changing environmental conditions up there… so
we’re not
exactly sure what tomorrow’s benzene levels are going to be unless
we check for it,” he said.
NPR,
Dec 24, 2015: The carcinogen benzene
was found well above expected levels in one government air sample…
the sheer size of the release has been shocking… [Tim O’Connor,
oil & gas specialist] “This
is so far above and beyond what I’ve ever seen or
what most people… in the oil and gas space have ever seen.”
Gizmodo,
Dec 30, 2015: The leak has taken a serious toll on Porter Ranch
residents, who for weeks have reported headaches, nausea, dizziness,
and other symptoms… “People are having very real responses, based
on their own sensitivity,” [Cyrus Rangan, director of the Toxics
Epidemiology Program at LA County’s Department of Public Health]
told Gizmodo. “In terms of acute chemical exposures, this
is a really, really big deal.”
The
Independent,
Dec 29, 2015: Infrared video reveals huge
‘uncontained’ Methane gas leak in
Los Angeles… Tim O’Connor, California climate director for the
Environmental Defense Fund [said] “It is one
of the biggest leaks we’ve ever seen reported.”
“It is coming out with force, inincredible
volumes.
And it is absolutely
uncontained,”
O’Connor said… Company President Dennis V. Arriola wrote… “the
leak does not pose an imminent threat
to public safety.”
However,
Rick Parker disagrees. “It’s the most
massive gas
blowout, gas well blowout, in a populated area in
history.
This has never happened before in a populated area. And so when they
tell you that “It’s not damaging”, “It’s just temporary”
— whatever nonsense they’re feeding you — understand, nobody
knows. It’s
never happened before… This
can be deadly.
Make sure you’re getting treated… Nobody knows what breathing
this stuff constantly is doing to [the children]… He said.
The
gas company says, “This is just the smell you’re reacting to,
it’s just temporary, it’s not a problem, it’s not serious” —
these people aren’t stupid. How could somebody possibly say that?
We have children whose noses are bleeding
every day,
we have people who suffer from chronic headaches [and] are nauseous
every single day. How does that not become a serious issue? Why are
they saying something nobody here believes?… They’re trying to
convince everybody that it’s all in our heads. It’s a trick.”
he continued.
Mitchell
Englander, Los Angeles City Councilman (45:30) —
“I will tell you this
goes well beyond Porter Ranch.
We’ve had complaints from as far as Chatsworth, Northridge, and
Granada Hills. Apparently this plume of toxic chemicals and whatever
it might be doesn’t know zip codes. So it
does keep moving into different locations and different places…
This is the equivalent
of the BP oil spill on land,
in a populated community… We’ve declared a national
disaster here.”
Dr.
Richard Kang, pediatrician (52:45) —
“Unfortunately the only real way to get away from the symptoms is,
unfortunately, you
have to relocate – you
have to get away from the environment.”
r.
Brooks Michaels, physician (54:00) —
“The defense is capitalizing on the comment that it’s all in your
head. Let me clarify a little bit – it’s in your head, it’s in
your ears, it’s in your nose, it’s in your throat, and it’s in
your chest… We’re seeing asthma increases, we’re seeing people
who are using inhalers more often, primarily a lot of respiratory
problems… If
you have a chance to leave, if you’re able to leave… if you have
a chance to relocate, do it now. I’m telling you, it’s really
critical.
It’s what we don’t know, more than what we do know… A lot of
information will be coming out soon about what the chemical carbons
are that are so volatile… It’s
unbelievable when you see the quantity that’s there that is coming
out…
What I see in the field is the effect of that. Primarily pulmonary,
people will bleed from their nose. It’s not of course just a
pediatric problem, it affects all of us.”
Dr.
David Smith, veterinarian (57:00) —
“I have seen dozens of cases of pets being ill or becoming ill and
I do believe it’s related to the exposure to the gas… I’ve seen
dogs, cats, birds, pocket pets… The primary symptoms I’ve seen
are gastrointestinal vomiting primarily. One dog actually had a
torsion — I think is related to it — where the
stomach flips on itself,
not a good thing. We’ve seen quite a few respiratory problems…
the only good solution is treat symptoms and remove pets form the
exposure as much as possible, especially the chronic exposure…
There are not things you should be inhaling… We have seen
dermatologic issues as well, some
very unusual bacterial infections in
dogs. Interestingly enough, one client had a dog with a very unusual
bacterial infection on its face. And the
client developed almost the exact same kind of symptoms very soon
after that,
actually 2 people in the house did… Their physician, thinks it’s
related, and so I tend to think these correlations are real.”
Jan
3, 2016: “I’ve been nauseous. I’ve felt lethargic,” said his
mother Christine Soderlund. “My kids have had nosebleeds, they’ve
had headaches… It’s surreal… We
are a living science experiment I believe.”
Los
Angeles Times,
Jan 5, 2016 (emphasis added): Utility
is installing screens to contain oily mist at leaking well near
Porter Ranch…
The structures under construction on the west side of the well head
are designed to capture airborne droplets of a brine solution that
“may have contained trace amounts of oil
naturally occurring within the leaking well’s reservoir,”
said Trisha Muse, a spokeswoman for SoCal Gas… Now, a mixture of
brine water and oil
is rising up into the gas company’s natural gas storage zone, then
traveling up the well and into the air.
As a result, local residents
are finding droplets of dark brown residue on their homes, vehicles,
fish ponds and gardens…
[The company] acknowledged that some residents had asked about “dark
brown spots on their property.” “We sampled it and, according to
our retained toxicologist and medical expert,” the company said,
“the
residue contained heavier hydrocarbons (similar to motor oil) but
does not pose a health risk.”… On Monday, plaintiffs’ attorneys
sent a letter to state regulatory officials [and] demanded that state
regulators “explain
what is happening with the petroleum now surfacing.”…
“There is a complete lack of information in the well files,”
their letter says, “to show where the gas and petroleum migrates
underground and the risk
for creating sink holes and geysers.”
Los
Angeles Daily News,
Jan 5, 2015: [A]n oily mist… has been surfacing… The seepage is
the result of changing
dynamics deep underground…
“They (the demister pads) are necessary because as the reservoir
pressure declines, fluids (oil and water) encroach
into the reservoir and are then carried to surface with
the gas.
BBC,
Jan 8, 2016: Residents… point out cars,
outdoor furniture and houses which have been marked with brown, oily
spots…
Tim O’Connor, a lawyer with the Environmental Defense Fund, has
called it “an
environmental and public health catastrophe,”
said . “In terms of timelines this
is going to surpass the gulf oil problem by a mile.”
New
York Times,
Jan 6, 2016: Gov. Jerry Brown, faced with mounting public anger
and no
end in sight to the leak,
declared a state
of emergency…
Mitchell Englander, the Los Angeles city councilman who represents
Porter Ranch [said] “This is one
of the most disruptive, catastrophic environmental events that
I’ve seen. It’s a truly
chaotic crisis.”…
Many who have stayed have taken to wearing surgical masks when they
garden to keep out the rotten-egg smell and the oily
mist that sometimes leaves brown residue on their cars…
Dennis Arriola, the president of Southern California Gas Company
[said] that experts
had “never seen anything like this.”
Newsweek,
Jan 7, 2016: SoCalGas and public officials have turned [Porter
Ranch's Matt Pakucko] and his fellow residents into “guinea
pigs.”…
[Sally Benson, who runs an energy storage lab at Stanford University]
shares a worry of many in Porter Ranch as they deal with the
mundanities of the leak: that the gas
plume will somehow become ignited, leading to [an] explosion…
“They’re really fortunate that this one hasn’t caught fire,”
Benson says… [The FAA] has imposed a no-fly zone above Porter Ranch
“out of concerns that fumes from the gas
leak could be ignited from the air.”
Schwecke, the SoCalGas vice president, says workers near the relief
well are taking every precaution, not using their cellphones and
working with brass hammers, which don’t spark… [David Balen, a
local businessman on the Porter Ranch Neighborhood Council] showed
me photographs
of a white dust that
had collected on concrete surfaces around his property; an expert was
coming to test the substance, which Balen thought was something
toxic.
BBC,
Jan 7, 2016: The governor of California has declared a state
of emergency in
a suburb of Los Angeles over the leaking of methane gas… the
company is installing large mesh screens around the leak site to try
and hinder the oily
mist from spraying down on the community.
Bloomberg,
Jan 5, 2016: The sulfurous scent of a natural-gas leak hangs in the
air as mail
carriers wearing gas masks make
rounds… “This is the biggest
community and environmental disaster I’ve ever seen, bar none,”
said Mitchell Englander, who has represented Porter Ranch on the Los
Angeles City Council since 2011. “Life there is not on hold —
it’s on the edge and it’s
on the brink of pandemonium.”
8 January, 2016
Air
quality regulators and Southern California Gas Co. have agreed on a
plan to capture and incinerate at least some natural gas from a
leaking well that has sickened and displaced thousands of residents
of Porter Ranch, according to a legal document filed this week.
Under
the plan, the gas company would deploy pollution control equipment as
early as next week to burn off both methane, the main ingredient in
natural gas, and foul-smelling odorants that are added to the gas for
leak detection.
The
steps are being proposed to satisfy an administrative order that the
South Coast Air Quality Management District is seeking to reduce
emissions and odors from the company's Aliso Canyon underground
storage facility in the Santa Susana Mountains. For more than two
months, a damaged well there has spewed more than 1,000 tons of
planet-warming methane a day into the air and sent foul odors into
nearby communities.
State of Emergency now underway for L.A. gas blowout
Oil begins raining down on homes
Official: “It’s on the brink of pandemonium”
Many worry plume will ignite, cause explosion
Concern over geysers, sinkholes being created
- Company: Experts have “never seen anything like this” (VIDEO)
8
January, 2016
Los
Angeles Times,
Jan 5, 2016 (emphasis added): Utility
is installing screens to contain oily mist at leaking well near
Porter Ranch…
The structures under construction on the west side of the well head
are designed to capture airborne droplets of a brine solution that
“may have contained trace amounts of oil
naturally occurring within the leaking well’s reservoir,”
said Trisha Muse, a spokeswoman for SoCal Gas… Now, a mixture of
brine water and oil
is rising up into the gas company’s natural gas storage zone, then
traveling up the well and into the air.
As a result, local residents
are finding droplets of dark brown residue on their homes, vehicles,
fish ponds and gardens…
[The company] acknowledged that some residents had asked about “dark
brown spots on their property.” “We sampled it and, according to
our retained toxicologist and medical expert,” the company said,
“the
residue contained heavier hydrocarbons (similar to motor oil) but
does not pose a health risk.”… On Monday, plaintiffs’ attorneys
sent a letter to state regulatory officials [and] demanded that state
regulators “explain
what is happening with the petroleum now surfacing.”…
“There is a complete lack of information in the well files,”
their letter says, “to show where the gas and petroleum migrates
underground and the risk
for creating sink holes and geysers.”
Los
Angeles Daily News,
Jan 5, 2015: [A]n oily mist… has been surfacing… The seepage is
the result of changing
dynamics deep underground…
“They (the demister pads) are necessary because as the reservoir
pressure declines, fluids (oil and water) encroach
into the reservoir and are then carried to surface with
the gas.
BBC,
Jan 8, 2016: Residents… point out cars,
outdoor furniture and houses which have been marked with brown, oily
spots…
Tim O’Connor, a lawyer with the Environmental Defense Fund, has
called it “an
environmental and public health catastrophe,”
said . “In terms of timelines this
is going to surpass the gulf oil problem by a mile.”
New
York Times,
Jan 6, 2016: Gov. Jerry Brown, faced with mounting public anger
and no
end in sight to the leak,
declared a state
of emergency…
Mitchell Englander, the Los Angeles city councilman who represents
Porter Ranch [said] “This is one
of the most disruptive, catastrophic environmental events that
I’ve seen. It’s a truly
chaotic crisis.”…
Many who have stayed have taken to wearing surgical masks when they
garden to keep out the rotten-egg smell and the oily
mist that sometimes leaves brown residue on their cars…
Dennis Arriola, the president of Southern California Gas Company
[said] that experts
had “never seen anything like this.”
Newsweek,
Jan 7, 2016: SoCalGas and public officials have turned [Porter
Ranch's Matt Pakucko] and his fellow residents into “guinea
pigs.”…
[Sally Benson, who runs an energy storage lab at Stanford University]
shares a worry of many in Porter Ranch as they deal with the
mundanities of the leak: that the gas
plume will somehow become ignited, leading to [an] explosion…
“They’re really fortunate that this one hasn’t caught fire,”
Benson says… [The FAA] has imposed a no-fly zone above Porter Ranch
“out of concerns that fumes from the gas
leak could be ignited from the air.”
Schwecke, the SoCalGas vice president, says workers near the relief
well are taking every precaution, not using their cellphones and
working with brass hammers, which don’t spark… [David Balen, a
local businessman on the Porter Ranch Neighborhood Council] showed
me photographs
of a white dust that
had collected on concrete surfaces around his property; an expert was
coming to test the substance, which Balen thought was something
toxic.
BBC,
Jan 7, 2016: The governor of California has declared a state
of emergency in
a suburb of Los Angeles over the leaking of methane gas… the
company is installing large mesh screens around the leak site to try
and hinder the oily
mist from spraying down on the community.
Bloomberg,
Jan 5, 2016: The sulfurous scent of a natural-gas leak hangs in the
air as mail
carriers wearing gas masks make
rounds… “This is the biggest
community and environmental disaster I’ve ever seen, bar none,”
said Mitchell Englander, who has represented Porter Ranch on the Los
Angeles City Council since 2011. “Life there is not on hold —
it’s on the edge and it’s
on the brink of pandemonium.”
A postwar nuclear lab with a nuclear generating plant and its core is buried less than two miles from the Porter Ranch methane leak. Some reports Jan. 9 that the radiation levels in that area are up.
LA's
Nuclear Secret: Part 1
Tucked
away in the hills above the San Fernando and Simi valleys was a
2,800-acre laboratory with a mission that was a mystery to the
thousands of people who lived in its shadow
NBC,
22
September, 2015
The
U.S. government secretly allowed radiation from a damaged reactor to
be released into air over the San Fernando and Simi valleys in the
wake of a major nuclear meltdown in Southern California more than 50
years ago — fallout that nearby residents contend continues to
cause serious health consequences and, in some cases, death.
Those
are the findings of a yearlong NBC4 I-Team investigation into "Area
Four," which is part of the once-secret Santa Susana Field Lab.
Founded in 1947 to test experimental nuclear reactors and rocket
systems, the research facility was built in the hills above the two
valleys. In 1959, Area Four was the site of one of the worst nuclear
accidents in U.S. history. But the federal government still hasn't
told the public that radiation was released into the atmosphere as a
result of the partial nuclear meltdown.
Now,
whistleblowers interviewed on camera by NBC4 have recounted how
during and after that accident they were ordered to release dangerous
radioactive gases into the air above Los Angeles and Ventura
counties, often under cover of night, and how their bosses swore them
to secrecy.
In
addition, the I-Team reviewed over 15,000 pages of studies and
government documents, and interviewed other insiders, uncovering that
for years starting in 1959, workers at Area Four were routinely
instructed to release radioactive materials into the air above
neighboring communities, through the exhaust stacks of nuclear
reactors, open doors, and by burning radioactive waste.
How
It Bean
On
July 13, 1959, the day of the meltdown, John Pace was working as a
reactor operator for Atomics International at Area Four's largest
reactor, under the watch of the U.S. government's Atomic Energy
Commission.
"Nobody
knows the truth of what actually happened," Pace told the
I-Team.
In
fact, Pace said, the meltdown was verging on a major radioactive
explosion.
"The
radiation in that building got so high, it went clear off the scale,"
he said.
To
prevent a potentially devastating explosion, one that in hindsight
the 76-year-old Pace believes would have been "just like
Chernobyl," he and other workers were instructed to open the
exhaust stacks and release massive amounts of radiation into the sky.
"This
was very dangerous radioactive material," he said. "It went
straight out into the atmosphere and went straight to Simi Valley, to
Chatsworth, to Canoga Park."
Pace
and his co-workers frantically tried to repair the damaged reactor.
Instead, he said they realized, their efforts were only generating
more radioactive gas. So for weeks, often in the dark of night, Pace
and other workers were ordered to open the large door in the reactor
building and vent the radiation into the air.
"It
was getting out towards the public," he said. "The public
would be bombarded by it."
Pace
said he and his co-workers knew they were venting dangerous radiation
over populated areas, but they were following orders.
"They
felt terrible that it had to be done," he said. "They had
to let it out over their own families."
Area
Four workers "were sworn to secrecy that they would not tell
anyone what they had done," Pace explained.
He
remembered his boss getting right in his face and saying, "You
will not say a word. Not one word."
That
was more than five decades ago, but radioactive contamination didn't
just vanish. It remains in the soil and water of Area Four and in
some areas off-site, according to state and federal records obtained
by the I-Team. And, evidence suggests that the fallout could be
linked to illnesses, including cancer, among residents living nearby.
Arline
Mathews lived with her family in Chatsworth, downwind of Area Four
during some of the radiation releases. Her middle son, Bobby, was a
champion runner on the Chatsworth High School track team for three
years, running to the Santa Susana Field Lab and back to school every
day. Bobby died of glioblastoma, a rare brain cancer often linked to
radiation exposure. Mathews said there is no known family history of
cancer and she blames the radiation from Area Four for her son's
illness.
"He
was exposed to the chemical hazardous waste and radioactivity up
there," Mathews said. "There's no getting over the loss of
son."
The
Government Cover-up
Six
weeks after the meltdown, the Atomic Energy Commission issued a press
release saying that there had been a minor "fuel element
failure" at Area Four's largest reactor in July. But they said
there had been "no release of radioactive materials" to the
environment.
"What
they had written in that report is not even close to what actually
happened," Pace said. "To see our government talk that way
and lie about those things that happened, it was very disappointing."
In
1979, NBC4 first broke the story that there was a partial meltdown at
Area Four's largest reactor, called the Sodium Reactor Experiment.
But at the time, the U.S. government was still saying no radiation
was released into the air over LA.
But
during its current yearlong investigation, the I-Team found a NASA
report that confirmed "the 1959 meltdown... led to a release of
radioactive contaminants."
For
years, NASA used part of the site for rocket testing and research.
More
Radioactive Releases
After
filing a Freedom of Information request, the I-Team obtained more
than 200 pages of government interviews with former Santa Susana
workers. One of those workers, Dan Parks, was a health physicist at
Area Four in the 1960s.
In
the early 60s, Parks said, he often witnessed workers releasing
radiation into the sky through the exhaust stacks of at least three
of Area Four's ten nuclear reactors.
"They
would vent it to the atmosphere," he said. "The release was
done with the flick of a switch."
Radioactive
Waste Up in Smoke
Parks
said he often witnessed workers releasing radioactive smoke into the
air when they disposed of barrels of radioactive waste from Area
Four's 10 nuclear reactors.
"We
were all workers," he said. "Just taking orders."
Workers
would often take those barrels of waste to a pond called "the
burn pits" and proceed to shoot the barrels with a high-powered
rifle causing an explosion.
The radioactive smoke would drift into
the air over nearby suburbs and toward a summer camp for children.
"It
was a volatile explosion, beyond belief," Parks said.
Whatever
direction the wind was blowing, the radioactive smoke would travel
that way.
"If
the wind was blowing to the Valley, it would blow it in the Valley,"
he said.
Ralph
Powell, who worked as a security officer at Area Four in the mid-60s,
recalled being blanketed by that radioactive smoke.
"I
saw clouds of smoke that was engulfing my friends, that are dying
now," Powell said.
Powell
believes it wasn't just his friends who suffered the consequences. He
fears he may have exposed his own family to radiation, tracking it
home on his clothes and car.
While
Powell was working at Area Four, his son Michael was diagnosed with
leukemia — a cancer linked to radiation exposure — and died at
age 11.
"I
suspect it caused the death of my son," he said. "I've
never gotten that out of my mind."
Toxic
Chemical Contamination
In
addition to the radiation, dozens of toxic chemicals, including TCE
and Perchlorate, were also released into the air and dumped on the
soil and into ground and surface water from thousands of rocket tests
conducted at the Santa Susana Field lab from the 1950s to 80s. The
tests were conducted by NASA, and by Rocketdyne, a government
aerospace contractor.
According
to a federally funded study obtained by the I-Team, "emissions
associated with rocket engine testing" could have been inhaled
by residents of "West Hills, Bell Canyon, Dayton Canyon, Simi
Valley, Canoga Park, Chatsworth, Woodland Hills, and Hidden Hills."
Contamination
Moves into Neighborhoods
Radiation
released at Area Four continues to contaminate the soil and water of
the Santa Susana Field Lab.
In
2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency completed a $40
million soil test of the site and found 423 hot spots — places
contaminated with high levels of man-made radiation.
Other
studies and government documents obtained by the I-Team show that
radiation has moved off-site, and has been found in the ground and
water in suburbs to the south, northeast and northwest of the Field
Lab.
"Radiation
doesn't know any boundaries," said Dr. Robert Dodge, a national
board member of the Nobel Prize-winning nonprofit Physicians For
Social Responsibility, which studies the health effects of radiation.
Dodge,
who has reviewed numerous government and academic studies about the
contamination at Santa Susana, said he believes the contamination has
spread far beyond the facility's borders.
"If
the wind is blowing and carrying radiation from Santa Susana, it
doesn't stop because there's a fence," he said.
One
of the places radiation has been found, in a 1995 study overseen by
the U.S. EPA, was the Brandeis-Bardin Institute in Simi Valley. The
Institute is a nationally-known center of Jewish learning, and the
home to Camp Alonim, a beloved summer sleepaway camp that has hosted
some 30,000 children.
In
December 1995, The Brandeis-Bardin Institute filed a federal lawsuit
against the present and past owners of the Santa Susana Field Lab,
alleging that toxic chemicals and radiation from the field lab "have
subsequently seeped into and come to be located in the soil and
groundwater" of Brandeis "is injurious to the environment"
and "will cause great and irreparable injury."
Brandeis
settled the lawsuit in a confidential agreement in 1997.
A
spokesman for the Brandeis-Bardin Institute, Rabbi Jay Strear, told
NBC4 that the groundwater and soil is "tested routinely,"
and the results have shown the "the site is safe."
The
I-Team asked Brandeis-Bardin to provide NBC4 with those test results
showing the site is safe and free of hazardous substances. The
Institute refused, and in an email said "we are not in a
position to devote the required staff time to respond to your more
detailed inquiries, nor do we see the necessity for doing so."
A
government scientist who has studied the contamination at Santa
Susana told the I-Team he thinks there's a continued threat of
radiation and toxic chemicals flowing from the field lab to places
like Brandeis-Bardin, via groundwater and airborne dust.
Clusters
of Cancer
Researchers
inside and out of government have contended that the radiation and
toxic chemicals from Santa Susana might have caused many cancer
cases.
"The
radiation that was released in 1959 and thereafter from Santa Susana
is still a danger today," Dr.Dodge said. "There is
absolutely a link between radiation and cancer."
The
I-Team tracked down dozens of people diagnosed with cancer and other
illnesses who grew up in the shadow of Santa Susana — in Canoga
Park, West Hills, Chatsworth, Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley. Many of
them believe their cancers were caused by radiation and chemicals
from the field lab.
Kathryn
Seltzer Carlson, 56, and her sisters, Judy and Jennifer, all grew up
in Canoga Park around the time of the nuclear meltdown and for years
after, and all have battled cancer.
"I
played in the water, I swam in the water, I drank the water"
that ran off the Santa Susana Field Lab, said Carlson, who finished
treatment for ovarian cancer earlier this year and is now undergoing
chemotherapy for lymphoma. "I've had, I don't know how many
cancers."
Bonnie
Klea, a former Santa Susana employee who has lived in West Hills
since the 60s, also battled bladder cancer, which is frequently
linked to radiation exposure.
"Every
single house on my street had cancer," Klea said.
A
2007 Centers for Disease Control study found that people living
within two miles of the Santa Susana site had a 60 percent higher
rate of some cancers.
"There's
some provocative evidence," said Dr. Hal Morgenstern, an
epidemiologist who oversaw the study. "It's like circumstantial
evidence, suggesting there's a link" between the contamination
from Santa Susana and the higher cancer rates.
Silence
From the Government
For
more than two months, the I-Team asked to speak with someone from the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the federal agency that's
responsible for all nuclear testing, to ask why workers were ordered
to release dangerous radiation over Los Angeles, why the DOE has
never publicly admitted this happened, and what it plans to do to
help get the site cleaned up.
The
DOE emailed the I-Team, "We will not have anyone available for
this segment."
So
the I-Team showed up at a public meeting this month about Santa
Susana and asked the DOE's project manager for the site, Jon Jones,
to speak with us. He walked away and wouldn't speak.
Will
the Contamination Ever Be Cleaned Up?
Community
residents, many stricken with cancer and other radiation-related
illnesses, have been fighting for years to get the government and the
private owners of the Santa Susana Field Lab to clean up the
contamination that remains on the site.
But
efforts in the state legislature and state agencies that oversee
toxic sites have, so far, stalled.
But
residents, with the support of some lawmakers, continue to fight for
a full cleanup.
"People
are continuing to breathe that (radiation) in and to die,"
Chatsworth resident Arline Mathews said.
"See
that this is done immediately, before more lives are lost."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.