Syrian
MIGs cover Russian SUs in northern Latakia
14
January, 2016
Two
Syrian Mig-29 jetfighters escorted, for the first time, two Russian
Su-25 bombers in a cover-up mission in northern Syria.
A
video released by “STAR” TV channel showed two Syrian Mig-25
jetfighters took off following two Russian Su-25 bombers to carry out
a joint combat mission against ISIS’ infrastructure.
The
footage was filmed in Hmeymim airbase in the Syrian coastal city of
Jableh, Latakia.
International Military Review – Syria-Iraq battlespace, Jan.13, 2016
RUSSIA-SYRIA AIRBASE TREATY TEXT PUBLISHED
The
agreement between Russia and Syria on basing a Russian airgroup on
Syria’s territory is of indefinite duration. This is what the text
of the August 26, 2015 treaty stipulates,
the text of which was published on the official Russian legal
information portal.
The
document notes that if either of the parties decides to withdraw from
the treaty, it must notify the other party in writing. The treaty
expires in one year after the date the written notification is
received by the other party.
The
treaty was signed in Damascus on August 26 in two original copies,
one in Russian and one in Arabic, with both having equal legal
standing.
The
treaty specifies that the Syrian party makes available the Hmeimim
airbase in Latakia province, and also “necessary additional
territory as agreed upon by the parties.” The treaty stipulates
that Hmeimim airbase and its infrastructure are to be used by Russia
free of charge.
BALTIC STATES: PENTAGON’S TRAINING GROUNDS FOR AFGHAN AND FUTURE WARS
This
incisive article written more than five years ago examines what has
now a fait accompli: Integration into NATO, Threatening Russia, the
Militarization of the Baltic States
Originally
appeared at rickrozoff.wordpress.com
With
the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization into Eastern
Europe from 1999-2009, the U.S.-led military alliance has grown by 75
percent, from 16 to 28 members.
By
2009 all former non-Soviet Warsaw Pact member states had been
incorporated into NATO, the former German Democratic Republic (East
Germany) being absorbed with its merger into the Federal Republic in
1990. The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland joined NATO in 1999 and
Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia in 2004. Albania, which suspended
participation in the Warsaw Pact six years after its founding, in
1961, was brought into the Alliance last year.
The
2004 expansion included seven nations in all, the three mentioned
above, the first former Yugoslav republic, Slovenia, and the first
former Soviet republics: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
Immediately
upon their accession, the United States began to employ the new
members’ territory for military bases, troop deployments, air
patrols and the initial stages of a continent-wide anti-ballistic
missile system beyond already existing NATO plans for the bloc’s
Active Layered Theatre Ballistic Missile Defence Programme.
The
year after Romania was brought into NATO’s ranks, U.S. Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice signed an agreement with its government to
acquire the use of four military bases in the country, including the
Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base in southeast Romania near the Black Sea
which had been used two years before for the invasion of Iraq.
Romanian President Traian Basescu paid his first official visit to
Washington to meet with President George W. Bush, Secretary of State
Rice and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld five months before the
treaty was signed.
At
the time the Pentagon’s acquisition of the bases was characterized
as part of Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s “strategic shift intended
to place US forces closer to potential areas of conflict in North
Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.” [1] Washington had led
NATO’s nearly three-month air war against nearby Yugoslavia five
years before, invaded Afghanistan two years after that and launched
the attack on Iraq another two years later. Three wars in less than
four years and all to the east of NATO’s former area of
responsibility.
The
pact with Romania was the first of its kind in a former Warsaw Pact
nation. It was followed the next year by a comparable arrangement
with neighboring Bulgaria in which the U.S. secured the indefinite
use of four military facilities, including two air bases.
This
February the governments of Romania and Bulgaria announced their
willingness to host components of the American interceptor missile
system designed to cover all of Europe under what the White House and
the Pentagon call a new phased adaptive approach.
But
the first U.S. and NATO military presence in what had been Warsaw
Pact member states occurred the year before the U.S.-Romanian Defense
Cooperation Agreement and moreover was in former Soviet space. After
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania joined NATO in March of 2004 the North
Atlantic bloc immediately began what it deems a Baltic air policing
mission in the airspace of the three nations as a Quick Reaction
Alert operation.
In
the interim warplanes from several NATO member states – the U.S.,
Britain, Germany, France, Turkey, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Portugal,
the Netherlands, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Poland and Romania to
date – have flown what at first were three-month and are now
four-month around-the-clock rotations over the three Baltic states,
all of which have borders with Russia. Estonia and Latvia adjoin the
Russian mainland to their east and Lithuania Russia’s Kaliningrad
exclave to its west. (Northeast Poland also borders Kaliningrad.)
On
September 1 the U.S. took over NATO’s Baltic air patrol with the
493rd Expeditionary Fighter Squadron deployed from Royal Air Force
Lakenheath, England to the Siauliai International Airport in
Lithuania where the NATO Baltic Air Policing mission is based. Four
U.S. F-15C Eagle jet fighters, capable of being armed with four types
of air-to-air weapons including Sparrow and Sidewinder missiles, and
120 personnel are assigned to the mission.
It
is the third time American warplanes have been deployed for the
Baltic air operation and the second time F-15 Eagles have been
employed for the purpose.
U.S.
ambassador to Lithuania Anne Derse, who came to the position from
being American envoy to Azerbaijan, said as the U.S. Air Force took
over from its Polish counterpart: “The (493rd has) already
established a legacy of professionalism in the Baltics, and we look
forward to building upon it. As all warriors know, the surest way to
maintain peace is to exercise constant vigilance and rigorously
prepare to meet all potential threats. The Baltic air policing
mission is just one of many facets of NATO’s vigilance and
preparation.” Derse didn’t indicate which potential threats the
warriors were preparing to confront, but a look at a map of the
Baltic Sea does.
Major
General Mark Zamzow, vice commander of the 3rd Air Force based at the
Ramstein Air Base in Germany, added, “Our relationship with the
Baltic nations has grown remarkably since the inception of the Air
policing mission.”
He
was also cited claiming “a 2008 endeavor designed to provide
complex air policing training has since evolved with a broader scope
emphasizing a wide spectrum of air operations over Lithuania, Latvia
and Estonia.” [2]
Two
weeks after the U.S. warplanes and airmen arrived in Lithuania, the
president of neighboring Estonia officiated over the opening of the
newly expanded and modernized Amari Air Base in his nation, which the
local press reported can accommodate 16 NATO jet fighters, 20
military transport planes and 2,000 troops. President Toomas Hendrik
Ilves said “The construction of the Amari Air Base, which was
jointly financed by the Estonian state and NATO, is a perfect
expression of the solidarity between allies” [3] and that “the
completion of the air base would make it much easier to bring allied
troops and their equipment to Estonia in the event of a crisis
situation.”
He
also “underscored the fact that from 2012, when the complex as a
whole is due for completion, NATO will have one of the most modern
air force bases in the region at its disposal.” [4]
Estonian
Air Force chief Brigadier General Valeri Saar confirmed that Baltic
air policing warplanes could use the base in the future and that NATO
pilots will begin to employ it for training purposes beginning in
October.
Not
only have NATO and the U.S. moved military personnel and aircraft
into nations bordering northwestern Russia, but they have done so in
flagrant violation of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in
Europe (CFE) negotiated in 1989 between the 16 members of NATO and
six of the Warsaw Pact at the time, which mandated comprehensive
limits on several categories of conventional military equipment in
Europe.
The
treaty was signed in 1990 and ratified the next year after the
dissolution of both the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union, which
created gray areas that the Pentagon could exploit – as it has
through NATO’s eastward expansion in the interim – to station
military hardware and personnel in Russia’s fellow Black Sea states
Bulgaria and Romania and in its Baltic Sea neighbors Estonia,
Lithuania and Poland.
The
CFE pact was signed by 22 nations and ratified by 30: The 16 members
of NATO, six non-Soviet former members of the Warsaw Pact and eight
ex-Soviet republics: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia,
Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine.
Estonia,
Latvia and Lithuania are not signatories to the treaty. Neither is
former Yugoslav republic Slovenia, inducted into NATO along with the
three Baltic states in 2004.
In
1999 an Adapted Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty (CFE-II)
was signed during the Organization for Security and Co-operation in
Europe summit in Istanbul by the same 30 countries that had endorsed
the original.
To
date only four former Soviet republics – Belarus, Kazakhstan,
Russia and Ukraine – have ratified it. NATO nations have sabotaged
the treaty’s implementation by linking it, without legitimate legal
or other grounds, with the withdrawal of what until recently were
small Russian peacekeeping contingents in Transdniester, Abkhazia and
South Ossetia. What NATO refers to as the Istanbul Commitments. 1,500
Russia troops in Transdniester have no impact on European security,
but by preventing the CFE-II treaty from entering into force the U.S.
and NATO retain the right to violate the treaty’s (and its
predecessor’s) limits on troops and armaments – including combat
aircraft and attack helicopters – in non-signatory nations like
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Russia suspended its commitments under
the CFE-II treaty three years ago because of concerns over the U.S.
and NATO deploying troops and equipment to Eastern Europe and the
threat of missile shield deployments to follow.
This
past May the first deployment of U.S. anti-ballistic missiles in
Europe was achieved when a Patriot Advanced Capacity-3 missile
battery and over 100 troops were moved into the Polish city of Morag
near the Baltic Sea.
When
on September 17 of last year U.S. President Barack Obama and
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced the decision to shift
from previous interceptor missile plans for Eastern Europe to the
“smarter, stronger, and swifter” phased adaptive approach,
discussions began on stationing Standard Missile-3 interceptors, both
the traditional ship-based and new land-based versions, in the Baltic
as well as the Black and Mediterranean Seas.
Estonia,
Latvia and Lithuania not having signed the original CFE treaty or its
successor and no NATO state having ratified the adapted agreement
permit Washington to deploy longer-range interceptor missiles as well
as warplanes to and off the coasts of the three Baltic states.
The
U.S. and NATO have claimed that moving military forces and equipment
into Eastern Europe, several thousand U.S. troops to Bulgaria and
Romania at any given times along with jet fighters to the Baltic Sea
region and missiles to Poland, is not in violation of the CFE treaty
as they are not permanent deployments. But they are. NATO’s Baltic
air policing mission, for example, has been conducted for almost six
and a half years and, as seen above, is expanding in scope into the
indefinite future.
Moreover,
NATO’s four new members on the Baltic Sea – Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania and Poland – have been transformed into training grounds
for the Pentagon’s and NATO’s wars abroad, especially that in
Afghanistan, and to prepare for potential confrontation and conflict
with fellow Baltic littoral state Russia.
U.S.
troops, warships and warplanes are present in the region on a regular
basis, conducting military exercises several times a year.
The
trade-off between the U.S. and other founding members of NATO on the
one hand and the bloc’s new members in Eastern Europe on the other
is for the latter to provide bases for use by Washington and Brussels
and to supply troops for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as
others to come in exchange for NATO and its main member the U.S. –
the world’s sole military superpower – placing them under the
Alliance’s Article 5, the bulk of which states:
“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.”
As
examples of the obligations imposed on new member states, Poland ran
the Multinational Division Central-South in Iraq from 2003-2008 with
NATO assistance and deployed 2,500 troops for the command. It
currently has 2,600 troops in Afghanistan, where it has lost 21
soldiers, and another 400 held in reserve for the mission. The Iraq
and Afghanistan deployments are the largest overseas military
commitments undertaken in Poland’s history.
Estonia,
Latvia and Lithuania all had troops in Iraq – Latvia’s and
Lithuania’s under Polish-NATO command – and all three countries
currently have forces serving under NATO in Afghanistan.
NATO
maintains a Joint Force Training Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland,
responsible to its Allied Command Transformation in Norfolk,
Virginia, and in 2008 NATO inaugurated the Cooperative Cyber Defence
Centre of Excellence in Estonia, also connected with the U.S.-based
Allied Command Transformation. The second was established a year
after cyber attacks in Estonia which domestic – and U.S. –
officials blamed on Russia, although Estonian Defense Minister Jaak
Aaviksoo was compelled to admit he had no evidence that Russian
government agencies played any role in the attacks. Notwithstanding
which, the Western press at the time was rife with speculation over
NATO invoking its Article 5, first used as a justification for NATO
entering the war in Afghanistan, for the occasion.
This
June the Times of London wrote that:
“NATO is considering the use of military force against enemies who launch cyber attacks on its member states.”
A
report issued by the Group of Experts – led by former U.S.
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright – that NATO appointed to
promote the new Strategic Concept that will be adopted at the bloc’s
summit in Lisbon in November stated:
“a cyber attack on the critical infrastructure of a Nato country could equate to an armed attack, justifying retaliation.” [5]
Estonia
is a likely test case for the policy.
The
U.S. and NATO are ensuring they have the military forces in place to
make good on their threat by conducting almost constant war games in
the Baltic Sea.
On
September 13 over 4,000 troops and 60 ships along with planes and
helicopters from the U.S., Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Denmark,
Norway, the Netherlands, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland
and Sweden participated in this year’s Northern Coasts exercises in
the Baltic Sea, the largest maneuvers ever staged in Finnish
territorial waters.
On
September 20 U.S. Special Operations Command Europe launched the
Jackal Stone 10 multinational military exercise with 1,300 special
forces from the U.S., Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Croatia, Romania and
Ukraine. The exercises began at a Polish air base and continued at
two bases in Lithuania. The U.S. dispatched USS Mount Whitney, the
flagship of the U.S. Sixth Fleet (whose area of responsibility is the
Mediterranean Sea) to participate in the drills.
According
to a U.S. Naval Special Warfare official: “During the 10-day
special operation exercise, Mount Whitney’s presence was a huge
asset. The ship provided excellent surveillance of targets at sea and
helped the SOF [special operations forces] planners maintain an
excellent perspective of the big picture by strategically placing
itself off the coast, ready to perform any task the SOF required.”
[6]
The
United States European Command website said of the war games: “The
experiences and lessons learned from the current war in Afghanistan
underscore the critical importance of deliberate planning for
coalition special operations forces (SOF) missions.
“Training
opportunities such as the Jackal Stone 10 exercise, co-hosted this
year by Poland and Lithuania and coordinated by the U.S. Special
Operations Command Europe, provide a unique venue for the U.S. to
develop commonalities with its international SOF partners whether by
land, air or sea….The Jackal Stone 10 exercise allows SOCEUR
[Special Operations Command Europe] an opportunity to enhance the
capabilities of its partner nations so they can become an integral
part of the NATO footprint, specifically in developing the staff
planning and operational ability of special operations forces.” [7]
A
Polish newspaper revealed intentions beyond the war in Afghanistan in
reporting that:
“Exercise Jackal Stone 2010 was designed to enhance international military cooperation and increase military preparedness in CEE [Central and Eastern Europe].”
It
also quoted the previously mentioned Naval Special Warfare official
asserting that:
“[the exercise] was a unique opportunity for SOF units from these countries to promote better communication and improve our readiness to build a greater fighting force worldwide.” [8]
The
U.S. 352nd Special Operations Group conducted “midnight training
maneuvers” in the skies above Poland: “The mission began with two
Combat Shadows flying in formation. As the training progressed, the
crews conducted evasive maneuvers while flying at low levels in
reaction to simulated area threats.” [9]
U.S.
and Polish forces also held a mass casualty exercise to prepare for
“potential ‘real world’ emergencies” at the 21st Tactical
Airbase in Swidwin where the opening ceremony for Jackal Stone 10 was
held.
In
the words of Polish Warrant Officer Anna Matulska:
“I’ve been deployed to Iraq before and it’s the same way. We have to work quickly, we have to triage and as in the case of our burn patients, we have to make sure they are kept warm.” [10]
Jackal
Stone 10 had among other purposes that of preparing Poland to become
a “framework nation,” which will “enable it to assume command
of multinational special forces within NATO by 2014.” [11]
The
launching of the war games at the Swidwin air base included an
address by Polish Defense Minister Bogdan Klich, who said:
“Special operations in the world today are becoming increasingly important in the conduct of combat operations. And exercises like this check the ability of allied and international cooperation, which is essential for the success of the Allies.” [12]
On
the closing day of Jackal Stone 10 Klich left for Washington, D.C. to
meet with Pentagon Chief Robert Gates and “hold talks…on
Afghanistan and the future of NATO” as well as U.S. missile shield
plans. He also participated in the swearing-in ceremony of Polish
General Mieczyslaw Bieniek as NATO’s Deputy Supreme Allied
Commander Transformation in Norfolk, Virginia. “This is the highest
post that a Polish officer has ever taken in NATO,” Klich said. He
was reported as “adding that his presence at the ceremony is
necessary to show how important NATO is for Poland and how important
it is for the country to have its representative in high NATO
structures.” [13]
On
the same day the Polish defense minister arrived in Washington,
Polish Radio announced that former prime minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski
wrote to 738 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and “dozens
of ambassadors worldwide, urging them to help block an expansion of
Russia’s influence abroad.”
In
what was described as “an unprecedented move for a leader of an
opposition party,” the twin brother of recently deceased President
Lech Kaczynski demanded that:
“Washington and Brussels should…give greater assistance to countries that want to free themselves from the Russian sphere of influence.” [14]
The
ambassadors Kaczynski sent his letter to were those of the other 26
European Union member states, plus the U.S., Canada, Israel,
Switzerland, Norway, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Azerbaijan, Georgia
and Armenia.
The
last six nations are targeted by the Eastern Partnership initiative
of the EU, first promoted by Poland in 2008, which is designed to
recruit the former Soviet republics away from the Commonwealth of
Independent States and thus complete the isolation, the effective
quarantine, of Russia in Europe. [15]
The
U.S. and NATO are expanding the use of the Alliance’s Baltic Sea
member states to train for wars outside the region and for moving
American and NATO military forces into it.
On
September 27 the PRT-12 Challenge training exercise started at a
military base in Lithuania. PRT is short for Provincial
Reconstruction Team, a joint military-civilian counterinsurgency
pacification project. 27 PRTs operate in Afghanistan under the
command of several NATO International Security Assistance Force
(ISAF) troop contributing countries.
Lithuania’s
Kæstutis Battalion, the majority of whose troops “have been
deployed to multinational missions in the Balkans, Iraq and
Afghanistan previously,” is being prepared for a new rotation to
Afghanistan. “Representatives of Denmark, Georgia, Japan, the USA,
Poland, Finland and Ukraine serve together with Lithuanian military
and civilian personnel in the Ghor PRT camp in Chaghcharan.” Japan
is not officially acknowledged as an ISAF contributor.
The
training involves 200 troops, including Ukrainian forces. “A camp
was installed for the purpose of the exercise in the Kazlu Ruda
Military Area; it parallels the camp of the Lithuanian-led PRT in
Ghor….Soldiers will demonstrate their ability to respond to
fictitious situations, such as demonstrations of the local
population, insurgent attacks with IEDs on provincial roads, firing
at the camp, etc. The exercise is organised by the leadership of the
Lithuanian Land Force.” [16]
On
September 28 it was reported that 50 advance troops from other NATO
nations had arrived in Latvia for the Sabre Strike 2011 military
exercise to be conducted at the Adazi Training Area from October 18
to 31. “The aim of Sabre Strike 2011 is to tune [up]
interoperability procedures and improve the integration of the land
and air operational ability of three Baltic States and the U.S with
prospects of participation in the ISAF (International Security
Assistance Force) operation in Afghanistan and other multinational
operations in the future.” [17]
One
of the purposes of the exercises is the implementation of Latvia’s
role as part of the NATO Host Nation Support system – whose
“requirements include the deployment of NATO HQs, multinational HQs
and forces for exercises or for operations during peace, crisis, or
conflict” [18] – which “is one of the main tasks to ensure
Latvia’s successful integration in NATO.” [19]
NATO’s
new members on the Baltic Sea are delivering on the demands imposed
upon them by accession to the Alliance.
They
host NATO – particularly U.S. – troops, bases, warplanes,
warships and missiles. They provide troops for wars far abroad. They
supply training opportunities on the ground and in the air for the
war in Afghanistan and for future conflicts with none of the
restrictions that exist in North America and Western Europe. And they
render those multiple services near Russia’s western border.
1)
BBC News, December 6, 2005
2) Headquarters Allied Command Ramstein, September 1, 2010
3) Estonian Public Broadcasting, September 15, 2010
4) Office of the President, September 15, 2010
5) The Times, June 6, 2010
6) Warsaw Business Journal, September 28, 2010
7) United States European Command, September 28, 2010
8) Warsaw Business Journal, September 28, 2010
9) United States European Command, September 24, 2010
10) United States Air Forces in Europe, September 29, 2010
11) Warsaw Business Journal, September 28, 2010
12) U.S. Consolidates New Military Outposts In Eastern Europe
Stop NATO, September 23, 2010
13) Polish Radio, September 28, 2010
14) Polish Radio, September 29, 2010
15) Eastern Partnership: The West’s Final Assault On the Former Soviet Union
Stop NATO, February 13, 2009
16) Baltic Course, September 28, 2010
17) Defence Professionals, September 28, 2010
18) North Atlantic Treaty Organization
19) Defence Professionals, September 28, 2010
2) Headquarters Allied Command Ramstein, September 1, 2010
3) Estonian Public Broadcasting, September 15, 2010
4) Office of the President, September 15, 2010
5) The Times, June 6, 2010
6) Warsaw Business Journal, September 28, 2010
7) United States European Command, September 28, 2010
8) Warsaw Business Journal, September 28, 2010
9) United States European Command, September 24, 2010
10) United States Air Forces in Europe, September 29, 2010
11) Warsaw Business Journal, September 28, 2010
12) U.S. Consolidates New Military Outposts In Eastern Europe
Stop NATO, September 23, 2010
13) Polish Radio, September 28, 2010
14) Polish Radio, September 29, 2010
15) Eastern Partnership: The West’s Final Assault On the Former Soviet Union
Stop NATO, February 13, 2009
16) Baltic Course, September 28, 2010
17) Defence Professionals, September 28, 2010
18) North Atlantic Treaty Organization
19) Defence Professionals, September 28, 2010
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.