RUSSIA ADOPTS UPDATED NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY
31
December, 2015
President
Vladimir Putin signed a decree adopting the new Russian Federation
National Security Strategy. The corresponding document was placed on
the official legal information portal. The new edition of the
Strategy, prepared by the RF Security Council includes means of
fighting against radicalism and terrorism.
Consoяidating Position
Russian
Federation’s national priority is consolidating its position as one
of the leading world powers. The long-term national interests
are: “…consolidating Russian Federation’s status as one of the
leading world powers, whose actions are aimed at ensuring strategic
stability and mutually beneficial partnerships in the context of a
multi-polar world,” the document states. When it comes to national
priorities, it emphasizes strengthening the country’s defenses,
protecting its constitutional system, sovereignty and territorial
integrity, strengthening the national consensus, raising the quality
of life, preserving and developing culture, improving economic
competitiveness, and other principles of national security. Strategic
tasks listed in the document include ensuring food security through
“ensuring Russia’s food independence.” In addition, it calls
for accelerated development of Russia’s agriculture, increasing the
effectiveness of government support for agribusiness, preventing
uncontrolled traffic of GMO foods, and also training highly prepared
specialists for the agricultural sector.
The
Use of Military Force
The
documents allows for military force to be used only if non-violent
approaches prove ineffective. “Strategic deterrence and military
conflict prevention is accomplished through the preservation of the
strategic deterrent potential at a sufficient level, and through
ensuring the specified level of combat readiness in the Armed Forces
of the Russian Federation, other forces and military formations,”
the Strategy notes.
Crisis
Risk
In
view of the global economic imbalance, there is a high risk of
financial/economic crisis re-occurrence. “Against the background of
structural imbalances in the global economy and the financial system,
the growth of sovereign debt, and energy market volatility, the risk
of a repeated major financial and economic crisis remains high,”
the document states. “The growing influence of political factors on
economic processes, as well as individual countries’ attempts to
use economic methods, financial, trade, investment, and technology
policies to achieve their geopolitical objectives weakens the
resilience of the international economic system,” the Strategy
emphasizes. The document calls for strengthening the financial
system, ensuring a stable ruble exchange rate, and reducing interest
rates.
The
Strategy also implies the state will conduct socio-economic policy.
“In order to counteract the threats to economic security,
government agencies and local self-government entities in
collaboration with civil society institutions will implement the
state socio-economic policy which includes: …strengthening the
financial system, ensuring its sovereignty, stabilizing ruble
exchange rate, optimizing foreign currency regulation and monitoring,
reducing interest rates…” the document states.
Achieving
Food Independence
One
of the RF national priorities is achieving food independence. The
document states that food security will be achieved through
“achieving Russian Federation’s food independence.” Moreover,
the documents implies accelerated development of the agricultural
sector, increasing the effectiveness of state support for
agribusiness, preventing uncontrolled trade in GMO foods, and
preparing highly qualified specialists for the agricultural sector.
At the same time, the sanctions introduced against Russia are hurting
its economic security.
The
main strategic threats to national security in the economic realm are
the low competitiveness, the reliance on raw materials exports, and
high dependence on the international economic situation. “Negative
influences on the country’s economic security include economic
restrictions introduced against the Russian Federation, global and
regional economic crises, the growth of dishonest competition,
unlawful use of legal instruments, unstable provision of heat and
energy to the subjects of national economy, and in the future also
shortages of mineral, raw material, water, and biological resources,”
the document states.
Other
economic threats listed in the document include lagging in
development futuristic technologies, vulnerability of the financial
system, budget system imbalance, the offshorization of the economy,
the exhaustion of natural resources, the high share of the “shadow
economy” in the country’s economy as a whole, conditions favoring
corruption and criminalization, and uneven regional development.
Effective
Fuel and Energy Industry Management
Improving
the effectiveness of governmental direction over the fuel and energy
industry is a necessary condition for ensuring Russia’s energy
security. “The necessary conditions for ensuring energy security
include increasing the effectiveness of state control over the energy
and fuel industry, reliability and constancy of delivering energy
resources to end users, ensuring the country’s technological
sovereignty on the world energy market…”, the document states.
Foreign
Policy
Developing
relations with CIS countries, Abkhazia and South Ossetia is a major
focus of Russia’s foreign policy, according to the Strategy.
“Developing bilateral and multilateral cooperation with CIS member
states, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, is one of the key directions of
foreign policy,” the document states. The Strategy also emphasizes
the importance of relations with China, India, and notes its
importance for Latin American countries and Africa. The relationship
with PRC is viewed “as a key factor in preserving global and
regional stability.” Russia also assigns “a major role to the
privileged cooperation with India.” It is also noted that Russia is
developing political, trade, and military-technical cooperation with
Latin American countries, Africa, and regional organizations in which
these countries participate. Humanitarian and educational contacts
are also being maintained.
The
Role of Special Services
Special
services are playing an increasingly active role in the battle over
international influence, according to the Strategy. “The struggle
for influence in the international arena involves the whole range of
political, financial/economic, and information instruments. The
potential of secret services is being utilized more actively,” the
document notes. “The process of forming a new polycentric world
order is accompanied by the rise in global and regional instability.
Conflicts are escalating due to the uneven global development and the
growing differences between various countries level of well-being,
the struggle over resources and market access, control over trade
routes,” the Strategy states. “Competition between states is
being extended to values and societal development models, human,
technological, and scientific potential,” the document notes.
Partnership
with the US
Russia’s
independent policies are provoking resistance from the US and its
allies, the decree states. “Russia’s strengthening is occurring
against the background of new threats to national security which have
a complex and interdependent nature. Russian Federation’s
independent internal and foreign policy is causing counter-actions by
the US and its allies which are seeking to preserve their dominance
in global affairs,” the document states.
Nevertheless,
Russia is in favor of strengthening cooperation with the EU and a
fully-fledged partnership with the US. “Russian Federation is in
favor of strengthening mutually beneficial cooperation with European
countries and the EU, and of harmonizing the integration projects in
Europe and in the post-Soviet space, forming an open collective
security system based on a clear legal and treaty framework and
covering the Euro-Atlantic region,” the document states. “The
Russian Federation is interested in building a fully-fledged
partnership with the United States of America on the basis of common
interests, including economic, with an eye on the Russian-US
relations’ key influence on the international situation as a whole.
The most important aspects of such a partnership are perfecting
control mechanisms over armaments specified by international
treaties, strengthening mutual trust measures, resolving issues
related to WMD nonproliferation, expanding counter-terrorism
cooperation, resolving regional conflicts,” the text states.
NATO
Expansion
The
expansion of NATO and its approach to Russia’s borders creates a
threat to national security, according to the document. “Expanding
the force potential of NATO and endowing it with global functions
which are implemented in violation of international law norms, the
block’s military activization, its continued expansion, the
approach of its military infrastructure to Russian borders, all
create a threat to national security,” states the updated Strategy.
At
the same time, Russia is ready to expand its relations with NATO
provided the alliance gives due consideration to Russia’s
interests. “The Russian Federation is ready to develop its
relationship with NATO on the basis of equality in order to
strengthen the overall security in the Euro-Atlantic region,” the
document states. The Strategy notes that the determining factor in
the relationship with NATO is “the unacceptability to Russia of the
growing military activity by the alliance and the approach of its
military infrastructure to Russia’s borders.”
It
is emphasized that Russia is interested in establishing a
fully-fledged partnership with the US “on the basis of common
interests, including economic, with an eye on the Russian-US
relations’ key influence on the international situation as a
whole.”
Color
Revolutions
Inspiring
“color revolutions” is one of the main threats to Russia’s
security, the document states. It notes that regions neighboring
Russia are characterized by growing militarization and arms races.
“The role of force in international relations remains high. The
efforts to increase and modernize offensive armaments, creating and
deploying new types of weapons weakens the global security system and
also the network of treaties and agreements dealing with arms
control.”
The
most important threats to Russia’s state and societal security is
“the activity of radical societal groups and organizations which
are using nationalist and extremist religious ideology, of foreign
and international NGOs and financial and economic organizations, as
well as private individuals, aimed at undermining the unity and
territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, destabilizing the
political and social situation inside the country, including through
inspiring “color revolutions” and destroying traditional Russian
spiritual and moral values.”
The
document notes that the practice of overthrowing of legitimate
political regimes is becoming more widespread. “The practice of
overthrowing legitimate political regimes, provoking internal
instability and conflict, is becoming more widespread. In addition to
the still existing areas of instability in the Middle and Far East,
in Africa, South Asia, and the Korean Peninsula, new “hot spots”
have appeared and the territory not controlled by any government
authority has expanded.”
The
Schism in the Ukrainian Society
US
and EU support for the coup in Ukraine led to a split in Ukraine’s
society. “US and EU support for the anti-constitutional coup d’etat
in Ukraine led to a deep schism in the Ukrainian society and an armed
conflict.” The document notes that the West’s effort to counter
the integration processes and to create hot spots in the Eurasian
region is having a negative influence on the pursuit of Russian
national interests.
“The
consolidation of an extreme right nationalist ideology, the
deliberate effort to create a public image of Russia as an enemy…is
turning Ukraine into a long-term source of European instability
located right next to Russia’s borders,” the document emphasizes.
The
US military-biological lab network
The
Strategy states the US is expanding its network of
military-biological laboratories on the territory of countries
neighboring Russia. The document points out that the world still
faces a high risk of proliferation and use of chemical weapons, “and
also the uncertainty as to which foreign countries have biological
weapons or the means to develop and produce it.” There is also the
danger that the number of nuclear weapons states will increase.
Countries with unstable internal situation run a high risk of
conventional weapons falling into terrorist hands, and the “physical
protection of dangerous objects and materials” is in a critical
state.
Block
Approach
“The
still-evident block approach to resolving international problems is
not facilitating the response to a whole range of challenges and
threats. The growth of migration from Africa and Middle East to
Europe revealed the bankruptcy of the regional system of security in
the Euro-Atlantic region that was built on the basis of NATO and the
EU.”
Nuclear
Deterrence
“Strategic
deterrence and the prevention of international military conflicts is
accomplished through supporting the nuclear deterrent potential at a
sufficient level, and the assigned combat readiness of the Armed
Forces of the Russian Federation and other armed formations.” At
the same time, Russia is ready for further discussion on reducing
nuclear arsenals. “In order to preserve strategic stability, Russia
is ready for further discussion on reducing nuclear arsenals on the
basis of bilateral agreements and multilateral formats.”
The
RF Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev earlier said that the
document included the ways of preventing the spread of radical
ideology and its propaganda in mass media, and emphasized the
importance of increasing the level of protection of critical
infrastructure, key individuals, society, and the state as a whole
against terrorist threats. According to Patrushev, the document
openly states that spread of terrorism, extremism, inter-religious
and inter-ethnic enmity was facilitated by the practice of
overthrowing legitimate regimes using the “color revolution” and
“hybrid war” methods. “The appearance and consolidation of the
influence by the terrorist organization which names itself the
Islamic State is the result of the policy of double standards which
is pursued by some countries in the realm of fighting terrorism,”
Patrushev emphasized. “The result of such irresponsible actions was
the prolonged instability in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, the war in
Syria, widespread proliferation of weapons, organized crime, drug
trafficking, and systematic violations of rights and freedoms of
millions of people.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.