Search of Hager's home ruled illegal
The
police search of journalist Nicky Hager's home last year has been
ruled illegal.
Nicky
Hager said he was very happy with the judge's decision. Photo: RNZ
/ Alexander Robertson
Radio NZ.
17 December, 2015
17 December, 2015
The High Court in Wellington has found police failed to disclose relevant information to the judge who issued a search warrant.
The
warrant was obtained and the search took place after blogger Cameron
Slater laid a complaint when information from his computer, obtained
by a hacker known as Rawshark, was published in Mr Hager's book Dirty
Politics.
Justice
Clifford declared the warrant was "fundamentally unlawful".
Speaking
on Checkpoint Mr Hager said it was a good day for
journalism.
"If
this decision had gone the wrong way then all around the country, and
into the future, there would have been people we needed to be
speaking up on issues as sources - telling the media what was going,
on letting the public know about things - who would have been more
frightened of doing that."
He
said the police action was a case of, "raid first and sort it
out later."
"What
the police thought they could do .......they thought they could raid
the house, take all our stuff, and then sometime in the future in a
court case decide whether they were allowed it or not."
Mr
Hager said he was very happy with the decision, for his family and
what he said were the important principles it upheld.
He
said the public's right to receive information about the actions of
people in positions of authority was at the heart of the case.
Mr
Hager said it also acknowledged that the confidential sources used in
investigative journalism, and in his case his book Dirty
Politics, deserved legal protection.
He
said more hearings would follow on other police actions taken against
him, and he would be seeking costs and damages.
Mr
Hager had asked the court to rule on the legality of the search
warrant and the search of his home last October.
Police
said they received Justice Clifford's decision this afternoon and
would take time to study the decision and consider further legal
options with Crown Law.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.