Fergusson is what happens when suburban cops get weapons of war
Michael Brown’s shooting was one thing. The protests are another. But military might does not belong on Main Street
Michael Brown’s shooting was one thing. The protests are another. But military might does not belong on Main Street
So,
last night, riot police in #Ferguson ordered
all the MEDIA to leave the area, is this still America or
what?
#ferguson #stl #mikebrown
#ferguson #stl #mikebrown
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/14/ferguson-cops-military-weapons-michael-brown-shooting-protests
You can argue about the looting and the brick-throwing. You can argue about what constitutes a race “riot” these days – and why the hell we are seeing teargas every other evening in the suburbs, or Jim Crow-reminiscent police dogs in the year 2014. There are a lot of things worth arguing about now that the world’s eyes are focused on Ferguson, Missouri, a town where two-thirds of the population is black and 50 of the 53 police offers are white, where one of those officers gunned down an unarmed black kid in broad daylight.
You can argue about the looting and the brick-throwing. You can argue about what constitutes a race “riot” these days – and why the hell we are seeing teargas every other evening in the suburbs, or Jim Crow-reminiscent police dogs in the year 2014. There are a lot of things worth arguing about now that the world’s eyes are focused on Ferguson, Missouri, a town where two-thirds of the population is black and 50 of the 53 police offers are white, where one of those officers gunned down an unarmed black kid in broad daylight.
But
here is something that makes no sense, that is inarguable: Ferguson
(population: 21,135) has about 40 robberies per year, a couple of
homicides, almost no arson cases and a crime rate only a bit higher
than the national average. Indeed, the town’s crime rate was going
down as of two years
ago, when
the last major data is available. Ditto in neighboring
St Louis.
Now
St Louis isn’t exactly the picture of safety, but two years ago the
St Louis Police Department also acquired a
Lenco BearCat armored military vehicle, a “tactical support
vehicle” and a helicopter that’s popular with the Korean air
force.
Earlier this year, the US Department of Homeland Security
donated a 22-ton Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle –
the thing we used on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan – to
the police department in nearby St Charles, Missouri (population:
66,463).
On
Saturday night, as people
took to the streets to protest the shooting death of
18-year-old Michael Brown, the Ferguson Police Department, the chief
of which reportedly
displays a confederate flag in his home, had this at his
disposal:
Sure,
there may have been “unrest” that needed paying attention to, but
why were there Iraq-grade trucks even at the ready in the police
station of an American suburb in the first place? Since when do local
cops need wooden
bullets and
AR-15s? What the hell is the point of cops looking like this?
What
is happening in Ferguson is exactly what opponents of the rise in
military-style policing across America have long feared: when the
feds arm white local cops with weapons of war and their
superiors encourage
them not to just play dress-up but to use their new war toys, it is
inevitable that ordinary citizens – especially citizens of color –
will get treated as the enemy. As we’ve seen in Ferguson, when
military might comes to Main Street, “hands-up,
don’t shoot” quickly turns into a
quasi-declaration of war on a grieving community
How
the hell do we stop equipping and training suburban cops as
warriors? I’ve
written about this for a long time,
and I’m not sure another unarmed black kid getting shot is going to
end what Radley Balko calls the
Rise of the Warrior Cop –
even now that military
veterans themselves have had enough.
But
this much we know:
- Small-town America does not often contend with military uprisings or terrorist attacks, so the war machines tend to get used on, you know, pumpkin festivals.
- Many small-town residents don’t like when federal grants put armored vehicles in their backyards, and even some local Republican lawmakers want to ban their acquisition without voter approval.
- You
would think that a police force sworn to protect us would make us
more safe with tanks and assault rifles in waiting, but an
ACLU report released this summer – examining
just 800 incidents of the estimated 45,000 annual Swat team
deployments in America – found the opposite: seven people
were killed and dozens were injured, including a baby – and 61% of
people impacted by drug-case Swat raids were minorities.
Kara
Dansky, the chief author of the ACLU report, told me this week that
“the unnecessary use of paramilitary policing tactics tends to
escalate the risk of violence to both civilians and officers.” She
said there is no central tracking system of the military equipment
going out to local police departments – just as there is no
oversight on how the equipment is used, or any reporting requirements
other than hitting drug-enforcement numbers that bring in more cash
to the local PD. One Georgia Congressman wants
to introduce real federal oversight, but it’s currently very
difficult to know exactly which police department has what, how much
they paid for it or what they use it for.
We
may never know whether Ferguson police chief Thomas Jackson – the
one with the flag, apparently – ordered in the armored vehicles of
war this weekend, because we don’t know very much about which
paramilitary police force is in control on which night. (They
are arresting
reporters, after all.) But we know what Jackson said on
Wednesday: “that
the anarchists that are coming in, the people that don’t want
healing, the people that just want to continue to fight” are
the people he’s allegedly “concerned about”. We know that one
cop in riot gear described
Ferguson to the Guardian on Monday night as “a war zone”. And
we know that cops who think they are fighting in a war zone like to
use their MRAPs and their battlefield guns on the street corner. We
know that this was the scene on Wednesday night, before the teargas
came again:
On
Tuesday, hours after the teargas and the wooden bullets came out in
Ferguson for the first time, Jay
Caspian King at the New Yorker asked questions we shouldn’t have
to:
[H]ave we ... become anesthetized to images of police in armored vehicles and full military gear? And has the proliferation of images on news and social-media sites made them seem any more normal?
The
world is arguing about whether the US should be intervening in Iraq,
whether we’ll have “boots
on the ground” in Baghdad or Mosul. Meanwhile, we have
boots on the ground in Ferguson, Missouri. There is nothing normal
about that. Why are we even arguing and asking anymore? The toys of
war do no belong in a town of 21,000 – not for protests peaceful or
less so, not for looting or brick-throwing. Certainly not for the
memory of Michael Brown, who was killed by a policeman with a gun in
the year 2014.
Great article.Hopefully it works for SEO rating as well as to get backlinks on site.
ReplyDelete