(Substantial methane release from the East Siberian Sea surface during early August likely in the range of 0.5 to 1 megatons points toward both atmospheric methane overburden and likely carbon store instability and large scale out-gassing in the Arctic. Image credit:
Sam Carana and
NOAA.)
From
the Arctic tundra to the Arctic Ocean sea bed to the Atlantic Ocean,
we have growing evidence of methane and CO2 releases from carbon
stores that may well be at the start of just such a large scale
feedback. Time and time again, we see evidence of significant (but
not yet catastrophic) emissions from Arctic methane stores (see image
above). With each passing year, the methane overburden in the Arctic
air grows. And we have had increasing evidence of a growing volume of
releases from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf sea bed, to the methane
emitting melt lakes proliferating over the thawing permafrost, to the
chilling and terrifying methane blow holes discovered this year in
Siberia.
The lower boundary of this
range is with rapid reductions in human greenhouse gas emissions, the
upper boundary is under business as usual. Such a 35 percent
equivalent emission, happening year on year for centuries, would be
more than enough to push Earth into a runaway hothouse scenario
without any further human greenhouse gas releases. And it is this
scenario, or the even more chilling worse case of very rapidly
ramping Arctic methane outbursts, that we should be very concerned
about.
Atlantic
Methane Hydrate Destabilization off US East Coast
Unfortunately,
the vast carbon store in the Arctic is not the only potential source
of heating feedback carbon release. For around the world, upon and
beneath the ocean sea bed, billions of tons of methane lay stored in
clathrate structures. These stores are separate from the large carbon
deposits in the Arctic. But they are no less dangerous.
(Methane Seep off US East Coast. Image source: Nature.)
“This
is the first time anyone has systematically mapped an entire margin,”
Christian Berndt, a marine geophysicist at GEOMAR in Kiel, Germany,
who was not involved in the study, said
in an interview to Science Magazine.
“They found that there was much more methane coming out than was
suspected beforehand.”
Currently,
only a small amount of the methane being released from the sea bed
off the US East Coast is likely hitting the atmosphere and is
probably not contributing anywhere near the volume of known emission
sources from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Most of the gas is just
absorbed by the water column, increasing acidification in the region
and contributing to anoxia. But the known clathrate store off the US
East Coast is very significant and large scale releases could result
in much more widespread anoxia, acidification, and provide a
substantial atmospheric heating feedback to human-caused
warming. Very
large and catastrophic outbursts could also result in slope collapse
and generate tsunamis along the US East Coast.
A concern that researchers may also need to further investigate.
Overall,
as much as 300 to 400 gigatons of methane could be at risk and even a
fraction of this store hitting the atmosphere would cause serious and
lasting harm.
Overall,
it is estimated that at least 30,000 methane seeps like the ones
recently discovered off the US East Coast may now be active with
potentially 10,000 in the East Coast region now under investigation.
The current study provides a good base line for further exploration
of what may well be a rather significant problem going forward.
“It
highlights a really key area where we can test some of the more
radical hypotheses about climate change,” said John Kessler, a
professor at the University of Rochester, in
an interview with the New York Times.
“How will those release rates accelerate as bottom temperature
warms?”
The
acceleration would indeed have to be substantial to add to the
already significant and troubling Arctic methane and CO2 release. But
the sea bed stores are vast and the rate of human warming is very
rapid. So the global ocean clathrate store is something to keep under
close watch and the discovery of yet one more source that is already
emitting at faster than expected rates is not at all comforting.
Links:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.