NATO
is desperate for war
By
Pepe Escobar
9
August, 2014
The
North Atlantic Treaty Organization is desperate; it is itching for a
war in battlefield Ukraine at any cost.
Let's
start with Pentagon supremo, US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who
has waxed lyrical over the Russian Bear's "threat": "When
you see the build-up of Russian troops and the sophistication of
those troops, the training of those troops, the heavy military
equipment that's being put along that border, of course it's a
reality, it's a threat, it's a possibility - absolutely."
NATO
spokeswoman Oana Lungescu could not elaborate if it was "threat"
or "reality", absolutely or not, but she saw it all: "We're
not going to guess what's on Russia's mind, but we can see what
Russia is doing on the ground - and that is of great concern. Russia
has amassed around 20,000 combat-ready troops on Ukraine's eastern
border."
In
trademark, minutely precise NATOspeak, Lungescu then added that
Russia "most probably" would send troops into eastern
Ukraine under the cover of "a humanitarian or peace-keeping
mission". And that settled it.
Hagel
and his remote-controlled Romanian minion Lungescu obviously have not
read this or simply ignored its detailed explanation by Russian Air
Force's spokesman: the "threat" or "build-up"
happens to expire this Friday, the last day of Russian military
exercises announced in advance.
Fogh
of War gets antsy
Right
on cue, NATO secretary-general Anders "Fogh of War"
Rasmussen arrived in Kiev practically foaming war in his mouth, ready
to lay down the groundwork for NATO's summit in Wales on September 4
when Ukraine, enthroned as a major non-NATO ally, could be projected
to become, in lightning speed, fully NATO-weaponized. Moreover, NATO
is about to seriously "build up" in Poland, Romania, the
Baltics and even Turkey.
But
then all sorts of Khaganate of Nulands (as in Victoria Nuland, US
Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs)
derivatives started to spin out of control. One can imagine the vain
Fogh of War vainly trying to regain his composure.
That
took some effort as he was presented with the spectacle of Ukrainian
President Petro Poroshenko - a certified oligarch dogged by dodgy
practices - trying hard to evict the Maidan originals from the square
in the center of Kiev; these are the people who late last year
started the protests that were later hijacked by the Banderastan (as
in Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan)/Right Sector neo-Nazis, the US
neo-con masters.
The
original Maidan protests - a sort of Occupy Kiev - were against
monstrous corruption and for the end of the perennial Ukrainian
oligarch dance. What the protesters got was even more corruption; the
usual oligarch dance; a failed state under civil war and avowed
ethnic cleansing of at least 8 million citizens; and on top of it a
failed state on its way to further impoverishment under International
Monetary Fund "structural adjustment". No wonder they won't
leave Maidan.
So
Maidan - the remix - has already started even before the arrival of
General Winter. Chocolate King Poroshenko must evict them as fast as
he can because renewed Kiev protests simply don't fit the hysterical
Western corporate media narrative that "it's all Putin's fault".
Most of all, corruption is even nastier than before - now with plenty
of neo-Nazi overtones.
With
Fogh of War already fuming because "Russia won't invade",
the pompously named "Secretary" of Ukraine's National
Security and Defense Council, neo-Nazi Andrey Parubiy - who is the
most likely candidate for having ordered the hit last month on the
MH17 civilian aircraft - decided to step out; a certified rat
abandoning a sinking ship move mostly provoked by the fact he did not
get an extended ethnic cleansing overdrive in Eastern Ukraine, and
had to endure a ceasefire. Poroshenko is not an idiot; after loads of
bad PR, he knows his nationwide "support" is evaporating by
the minute.
Compounding
all this action, a US missile cruiser enters the Black Sea again "to
promote peace". The Kremlin and Russian intel easily see that
for what it is.
And
then there's the horrendous refugee crisis building up in eastern
Ukraine. This past Tuesday, Moscow during a UN Security Council
meeting requested emergency humanitarian measures - predictably in
vain. Washington blocked it because Kiev had blocked it ("There
is no humanitarian crisis to end"). Russian Ambassador Vitaly
Churkin dramatically described the situation in Donetsk and Luhansk
as "disastrous", stressing that Kiev is intensifying
military operations.
According
to the UN itself, at least 285,000 people have become refugees in
eastern Ukraine. Kiev insists the number of internal refugees is
"only" 117,000; the UN doubts it. Moscow maintains that a
staggering 730,000 Ukrainians have fled into Russia; the UN High
Commission for Refugees agrees. Some of these refugees, fleeing
Semenivka, in Sloviansk, have detailed Kiev's use of N-17, an even
deadlier version of white phosphorus.
When
Ambassador Churkin mentioned Donetsk and Luhansk, he was referring to
Kiev's goons gearing up for a massive attack. They are already
shelling the Petrovski neighborhood in Donetsk. Almost half of
Luhansk residents have fled, mostly to Russia. Those who stayed
behind are mostly old-age pensioners and families with small
children.
Humanitarian
crisis does not even begin to describe it; there's no water,
electricity, communication, fuel and medicine left in Luhansk. Kiev's
heavy artillery partially destroyed four hospitals and three clinics.
Luhansk, in a nutshell, is the Ukrainian Gaza.
In
a sinister symmetry, just as it gave a free pass to Israel in Gaza,
the Obama administration is giving a free pass to the butchers of
Luhansk. And there's even a diversion. Obama was mulling whether to
bomb The Caliph's Islamic State goons in Iraq, or maybe drop some
humanitarian aid. He opted for (perhaps) "limited" bombing
and arguably less limited food and water airdrops.
So
let's be clear. For the US government, "there might be a
humanitarian catastrophe" in Mount Sinjar in Iraq, involving
40,000 people. As for at least 730,000 eastern Ukrainians, they have
the solemn right to be shelled, bombed, air-stricken and turned into
refugees.
The
new Somalia
Moscow's
red lines are quite explicit: NATO out of Ukraine. Crimea as part of
Russia. No US troops anywhere near Russia's borders. Full protection
for the Russian cultural identity of southern and eastern Ukraine.
Yet
the - real - humanitarian crisis (which Washington dismisses) is
another serious matter entirely. Kiev's forces are not equipped for
prolonged urban warfare. But assuming these forces - a compound of
regular military; oligarch-financed terror/death squads; the
neo-Nazi-infested "voluntary" Ukrainian national guard;
US-trained foreign mercenaries - decide to go for mass carnage to
take Donetsk and Luhansk, arguably Moscow will have to consider what
NATO types spin as a "limited ground intervention" in
Ukraine.
NATO
spinsters are foolish enough to believe that if Putin can disguise
the intervention as a peacekeeping or humanitarian mission, he may be
able to sell it to Russian public opinion. In fact Putin has not
"invaded" because Russian public opinion does not want it.
His popularity is at a staggering 87%. Only an - improbable -
Kiev-perpetrated mass carnage would change the equation, and sway
Russian public opinion. Considering this is exactly what NATO wants,
Fogh of War will be working overtime to force his vassals to bring
about such carnage.
Still,
considering the latest developments, what facts on the ground point
to is the current oligarch dance in Kiev already unraveling - as in
this example here. Moscow won't even have to bother to consider
"invading". Meanwhile, Poroshenko's slow motion genocide in
Eastern Ukraine, as well as his crackdown of Maidan remix in Kiev,
will keep getting a free pass. All hail Ukraine as the new Somalia; a
fitting Frankenstein created by the exceptionalist Empire of Chaos.
Pepe
Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is
Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007), Red Zone Blues: a
snapshot of Baghdad during the surge (Nimble Books, 2007), and Obama
does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.