Merkel intends to "buy off" Putin into abandoning the Donbass and the rest of the Ukraine to the West-backed Putsch regime occupying Kiev AND a gas deal in return for recognition of what Russia already has salvaged, the Crimea. That sounds like an unacceptable poor bargain, trying to buy us off "with our own coin" as it were
---Mark Sleboda
Five
Reasons Why This Weekend Might Be The Start Of The Endgame In Ukraine
It's
a risky business, attempting to predict the outcome of the conflict
in Ukraine. But this weekend's Kyiv visit by German Chancellor Angela
Merkel has stirred hopes that a resolution to the Ukraine-Russia
standoff and the bloody fighting in Donbas may finally be near. We
look at five of the key factors in play.
22
August, 2014
1.
This Is Germany We're Talking About
A
number of Western officials have already visited Ukraine since
fighting erupted between the Ukrainian military and pro-Russian
separatists in April. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, U.S.
Vice President Joe Biden, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh
Rasmussen.
But
none brings as much to the table as Merkel, who oversees the largest
economy in Europe, dominates foreign policy debate in the European
Union, and -- as a Russian-speaker raised in Communist East Germany
-- enjoys a more informed working relationship with Russian President
Vladimir Putin than many of her EU counterparts.
Merkel's
trip, which follows an invitation by Ukrainian President Petro
Poroshenko, is an obvious boost for Kyiv after months of flaccid EU
interest. But the German leader has already set a tone of compromise.
Speaking on August 18 in Riga, Merkel struck a delicate balance
between the interests of East and West -- pledging a NATO response to
any future Russian aggression in the Baltics or Poland but ruling out
a permanent NATO presence in the region. Some media have speculated
that she comes to Kyiv with a deal requiring gains and sacrifices on
all sides.
A report in
"The Independent" says
the plan would formally hand Crimea to Russia in exchange for a
withdrawal of Kremlin support in Donbas and a long-term gas deal that
would include compensation for revenues lost in Crimea, including
rent for the Black Sea Fleet. The deal would also forbid Moscow from
future meddling in Kyiv's EU integration; Kyiv, in turn, would agree
not to join NATO. The report's accuracy could not be independently
confirmed.
2.
The History Gods Say Yes.
Merkel's
visit coincides with two historically significant dates. August 23
marks the 75th anniversary of the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop
non-aggression pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union whose
notorious secret protocol cleared the way for a Soviet "sphere
of influence" and Moscow's forced annexations of the Baltic
States and parts of Romania, Poland, and Finland.
A
day later, Ukraine commemorates 23 years since its declaration of
independence from the Soviet Union -- an anniversary whose
traditional military parade holds particular resonance this year.
To
be sure, apt coincidences of history are no guarantee of cooperation
on the ground. But any deal ending the Kremlin's revanchist campaign
in Ukraine would be a fitting historical coda.
3.
Poroshenko And Putin Get Face Time.
The
last time these two men met was in June, when they joined world
leaders in France to mark the 70th anniversary of the invasion of
Normandy. They spoke briefly -- Merkel, significantly, was in the
huddle -- but with little result. But the two men are now due to meet
again on August 26 in Minsk, alongside an EU delegation led by
foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Putin's two main regional
allies, Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka and Kazakh leader
Nursultan Nazarbaev.
Officials
on all sides have outlined agenda issues in the blandest possible
terms -- energy, humanitarian needs, and "wider political
concerns" -- and there's still no guarantee that Poroshenko and
Putin will meet face to face. But Ukrainian officials have hinted
that progress is being made, with Poroshenko aide Valeriy Chaliy
noting, "a clear diplomatic roadmap is taking shape" that
will allow the parties "to talk about a move from war to
peace."
4.
The Military Tide Appears To Be Turning.
If
Ukrainian officials appear upbeat, it may have less to do with
diplomacy and more with battlefield success. The Ukrainian army,
initially hampered by poor training and equipment, floundered badly
in the early weeks of the fighting in April and May.
Pro-Moscow
separatists, suspected of receiving healthy shipments of arms and
supplies from Russia, quickly seized large swathes of the Donbas,
establishing de facto governments manned by Russian-born agents with
fighting credentials earned in breakaway regions like Transdniester
and Abkhazia. The region's two largest cities, Luhansk and Donetsk,
quickly fell under separatist control. Rebels began kidnapping and
sometimes killing local residents, and used surface-to-air missiles
to shoot down Ukrainian military planes -- and, it is suspected, the
Malaysian Airlines passenger jet carrying 298 people, a horrific
error that sent a wave of international condemnation crashing down on
Putin for his suspected rebel support.
In
recent weeks, however, Ukrainian forces have made strategic gains,
breaking through rebel corridors cutting off both Luhansk and Donetsk
and laying what military spokesman Andriy Lysenko called the
"preparatory work" for the cities' liberation. To be sure,
the fighting is far from over. Bulletins from the war zones are murky
and often contradictory, and many reports continue of Russian tanks
and APCs heading into the region, rather than out. Most seriously,
the intensified violence has come at a horrific human cost, with the
death toll totaling more than 2,080 civilians and combatants. Even if
separatist forces beat a hasty retreat, Kyiv will be left facing a
shattered, resentful region.
5.
Russia Itself Might Want A Way Out
For
a while, Moscow appeared to be profiting handsomely from its campaign
in Ukraine -- particularly in Crimea, where it was able, with
breathtaking efficiency, to return a lush southern territory to
Russia, where many ribbon-wearing citizens thought it belonged all
along.
But
the war has started to pinch. In addition to suspected culpability in
the MH17 shooting, the Kremlin has suffered a series of financial
setbacks -- some of them self-induced. EU and U.S. sanctions have
targeted, and disgruntled, some of the Kremlin's richest patrons, and
Putin's own "patriotic" initiative -- banning Western food
supplies -- is already causing a steep rise in prices and
spotlighting the woeful state of Russia's agricultural sector. The
Russian president, who has staked his political career on pocketbook
principles, is eager to avoid domestic discontent. Many observers
suggest that the Kremlin has already signaled that it's ready to step
back on Ukraine -- and cite as an example the recent withdrawal
of Moscow-born separatist leaders like
Igor Strelkov, who was believed to be acting as the Kremlin's agent
in Donbas.
In
his uncharacteristically
muted speech in
Crimea last week, Putin asserted Russia's historic right to the
territory but appeared to indicate the imperialist wish list would
end there. To be sure, current hopes of detente could be early or off
the mark. But a deal legitimizing Moscow's claim on Crimea would
allow Putin to come home looking like a winner -- even as he loses
Ukraine.
Yeah i don't buy point 4.Despite all the propaganda coming from western and Kiev media, the ATO is going horrifically and that is playing into their “willingness” to setttle.
ReplyDeleteFirst Donetsk and Lugansk are not surrounded not to mention taken. In the case of Lugansk notably the main road leading to the Russian border (to be used by humanitarian convoy is currently under Kiev's control however that entire unit is surrounded by LPR militia and there is a battle for control going on this second. These groups (Aidar and 80th) are cut off from supply lines and will eventually surrender or be destroyed. Donetsk has main roads (supply lines) under control by militia.
Second, 1 month ago it could be said at least ATO was winning ground (even despite horrific losses or weapons and people. In the last 2 weeks ATO has stopped gaining ground (ilovisk, iasinovata, DEbaltsevo) and in fact is loosing area north of lugansk and south east of lugansk (tide has turned).
Third, the losses of troops just KIA are huge based on ukranian troops interviews, internal gov documents leaked, and doing the math of how many troops survived from a 4500 person brigade. Interviews with troops say on days when hundreds were killed kiev claims 4 or 10 KIA, you do the math. Take the 30th for example 87 people made it back to yell at their uppers in western Ukraine for “leaving them to die”, around 500 are still fighting. Estimates are around 14000 by some estimates with 8000 more wounded. Not so crazy if you think of the southern cauldron 1.0 where 500 made it out from a group of 3 brigades 24, 79, 72 (roughly 12000 people). This In combination with desertions and switiching sides and the losses of military hardware that was both destroyed and captured, kiev's army no longer has the strength to continue attacking and therfore is planing on forming defensive positions. From slaviansk to mariopul.
Fourth, there have been 3 mobilizations and the last one resulted with resistance in transcarpathia, odessa, zhitomir, chernovits, lviv....
Fifth, 40 days from now ukraine will run out of coal that it needs for heating and electricity (that used to come from donbass), this is in addition to no more gas from Russia.
Sixth, war is expensive and Ukraine is bankrupt,
Seventh, Western countries have decided not to intervene in the civil war so far.