South
Korea to the US: No more wars for you
Washington wants war and
bloodshed because the Israeli regime is dictating what needs to be
done. Trump is allowing that to happen. He is conniving with an
essentially diabolical system, and this is really dangerous.
…by Jonas E. Alexis
29
June, 2017
South
Koreans are slowly but surely realizing that making a deal with a
nation that is drunk with perpetual wars is like making a deal with
the devil himself. In other words, people are seeing that perpetual
wars breed perpetual hatred, perpetual hatred breeds moral and
economic collapse, and moral and economic collapse breeds confusion,
chaos, and complete catastrophe.
Trump
is asking South Korea to pay for an anti-missile system (THAAD) that
will cost at least $1 billion dollars, and South Koreans are
basically saying that they cannot afford it. Hundreds of protesters
in the town of Seongju carried signs which said: “No THAAD, No War”
and “Hey, USA, are you friends or occupying troops?” Those
protesters clashed with the police and began to throw water bottles
at military trailers. In essence, those people are saying, “We
didn’t sign up for this.”
“South
Korea has slammed US President Donald Trump’s suggestion that Seoul
should pay for the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (Thaad)
missile system that is now being deployed in the country. Trump had
earlier questioned why the US was paying for the system that he
valued at $1bn (£775m).”[1]
Kim
Ki-jung, foreign policy adviser to presidential candidate Moon Jae-in
Moon and professor at Yonsei University, said: “Even if we purchase
THAAD, its main operation would be in the hands of the United States.
So purchasing it would be an impossible option. That was our topic
when we were considering the options.”[2]
Even
China has criticized THAAD, saying that “the anti-missile system
undermines [South Korea’s] own national security.”[3]
South
Koreans are realizing that the only people who actually benefit from
military programs and defense systems such as THAAD are defense
contractors and the rich and powerful, not the average person. If
there is no war and if Kim Jung-un is not really a threat, then
anti-missile systems are practically worthless. And those who have
built those systems are, well, going to lose money.
In
other words, perpetual wars, perpetual hatred and perpetual deaths
are actually good for some people. In the same vein, ISIS is good
because military contractors are profiting from that. It has been
reported that the Pentagon is selling “$300
million of military hardware to
the Kurdish army.”
In
short, it is foolish for the Trump administration to provoke a
country like North Korea. Nothing good has ever come out of perpetual
wars. Trump seems to have learned virtually nothing from the wars in
Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Libya. As my friend and colleague Mark
Dankof has recently said during an interview with Press
TV,
Trump “is
a dangerous man …
and I see the possibility of a global catastrophe.”
What
we now desperately need at this juncture is good old practical reason
in the political landscape. Russia has made several attempts to
cooperate with the United States, but the Neocons in Washington have
resolutely refused to talk. Why?
Obviously
because the Neocons and the Israeli regime have already rejected
Logos in all its manifestations. The moral and political order is
antithetical to the Neoconservative ideology, and that is one reason
why virtually no serious person can understand why Washington is
refusing to have reasonable and practical dialogue with other nations
they disagree with.
Washington
wants war and bloodshed because the Israeli regime is dictating what
needs to be done. Trump is allowing that to happen. He is conniving
with an essentially diabolical system, and this is really dangerous.
[1] Nandini Krishnamoorthy, “South Korea hits back at Trump for demanding $1bn for Thaad missile deployment,”International Business Times, April 28, 2017.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Tom
O’Connor, “Trump Demands U.S. Ally South Korea Pay For Missile
Defense Against Kim Jong Un,” Newsweek,
April 29, 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.