Here is a cross-section of news from the global economic collapse
Gerald Celente - Gary Null show - March 9, 2016
Are You Kidding Me? Chinese Exports Plunge 25.4 Percent Compared To Last Year
10
March, 2016
We
just got more evidence that global trade is absolutely imploding.
Chinese exports dropped 25.4
percent during
the month of February compared to a year ago, and Chinese imports
fell 13.8
percent compared
to a year ago. For Chinese exports, that was the worst decline
that we have seen since 2009, and Chinese imports have now fallen for
16 months in a row on
a year over year basis. The last time we saw numbers like this,
we were in the depths of the worst economic downturn since the Great
Depression of the 1930s. China accounts for more global trade
than any other nation (including the United States), and so this is a
major red flag. Anyone that is saying that the global economy
is in “good shape” is clearly not paying attention.
If
someone would have told me a year ago that Chinese exports would be
25 percent lower next February, I would not have believed it.
This is not just a slowdown – this is a historic implosion.
The following comes from Zero
Hedge…
Things are not getting better in China as Exports crashed 25.4% YoY (the 3rd largest drop in history), almost double the 14.5% expectation and Imports tumbled 13.8%, the 16th month of YoY decline – the longest ever. Altogether this sent the trade surplus down to $32.6bn (missing expectations of $51bn) to 11-month lows.
So much for that whole “devalue yourself to export growth” idea…
I
don’t know how anyone can possibly dismiss the importance of these
numbers. As you can see, this is not just a one month
aberration. Chinese trade numbers have been declining for
months, and that decline appears to be accelerating.
Another
very interesting piece of news that has come out in recent days
regards the massive layoffs that are coming at state industries in
China. According toReuters,
five to six million Chinese workers are going to be losing their jobs
during this transition…
China aims to lay off 5-6 million state workers over the next two to three years as part of efforts to curb industrial overcapacity and pollution, two reliable sources said, Beijing’s boldest retrenchment program in almost two decades.
China’s leadership, obsessed with maintaining stability and making sure redundancies do not lead to unrest, will spend nearly 150 billion yuan ($23 billion) to cover layoffs in just the coal and steel sectors in the next 2-3 years.
For
years, the Chinese economic miracle has been fueling global economic
growth, but now things are changing dramatically.
Another
factor that we should discuss is the fact that the relationship
between the United States and China is going downhill very rapidly.
This is something that I wrote about yesterday.
China has seized control of several very important islands in the
South China Sea, and in response the Obama administration has been
sailing military vessels past the islands in a threatening manner.
Most recently, Obama decided to have an aircraft carrier task force
cruise past the islands, and this provoked a very angry response from
the Chinese…
The four-ship U.S. strike group that patrolled the disputed South China Sea was followed by Chinese warships, a show of force that prompted a hard-line response from China doubling down on its claim to nearly all of the resource-rich sea.
China’s foreign minister said his country’s sovereignty claims are supported by history and made a veiled reference to the 5-day patrol by the Stennis Carrier Strike Group, as well as recent passes by China’s man-made islands by destroyers Lassen and Curtis Wilbur in recent months.
“The South China Sea has been subject to colonial invasion and illegal occupation and now some people are trying to stir up waves, while some others are showing off forces,” Wang Yi said, according to an Associated Press report, a day after the Stennis CSG departed the South China Sea. “However, like the tide that comes and goes, none of these attempts will have any impact. History will prove who is merely the guest and who is the real host.”
Most
Americans are not even paying attention to this dispute, but in China
there is talk of war. The Chinese are absolutely not going to
back down, and it does not look like Obama is going to either.
Needless to say, a souring of the relationship between the largest
economy on the planet and the second largest economy on the planet
would not be a good thing for the global economy.
And
of course China is far from the only country that is having economic
problems. Yesterday, I discussed how Italy’s banking
system is
on the verge of completely collapse.
A few days before that I discussed the economic depression that
has gripped much of South America.
A new global economic crisis has already begun, and just because the
United States is feeling less pain than the rest of the world so far
does not mean that everything is going to be okay.
There
are huge red flags in Europe, Asia and South America right now.
In addition, our neighbor to the north (Canada) is experiencing a
very significant slowdown. The irrational optimists can
continue to believe that the U.S. economy will somehow escape
relatively unscathed if they would like, but that is not going to be
what happens.
Just
like virtually everyone else on the planet, we are heading into hard
times too, and this is going to become a dominant theme in the
presidential campaign as we move forward into the months head.
The Financial System Is A Larger Threat Than Terrorism
by Paul Craig Roberts
Federal
Reserve Building, Washington DC, USA
12
March, 2016
In
the 21st century Americans have been distracted by the
hyper-expensive “war on terror.” Trillions of dollars have been
added to the taxpayers’ burden and many billions of dollars in
profits to the military/security complex in order to combat
insignificant foreign “threats,” such as the Taliban, that remain
undefeated after 15 years. All this time the financial system,
working hand-in-hand with policymakers, has done more damage to
Americans than terrorists could possibly inflict.
The
purpose of the Federal Reserve and US Treasury’s policy of zero
interest rates is to support the prices of the over-leveraged and
fraudulent financial instruments that unregulated financial systems
always create. If inflation was properly measured, these zero rates
would be negative rates, which means not only that retirees have no
income from their retirement savings but also that saving is a losing
proposition. Instead of earning interest on your savings, you pay
interest that shrinks the real value of your saving.
Central
banks, neoliberal economists, and the presstitute financial media
advocate negative interest rates in order to force people to spend
instead of save. The notion is that the economy’s poor economic
performance is not due to the failure of economic policy but to
people hoarding their money. The Federal Reserve and its coterie of
economists and presstitutes maintain the fiction of too much savings
despite the publication of the Federal Reserve’s own
report that 52% of Americans cannot raise $400 without selling
personal possessions or borrowing the money.
Negative
interest rates, which have been introduced in some countries such as
Switzerland and threatened in other countries, have caused people to
avoid the tax on bank deposits by withdrawing their savings from
banks in large denomination bills. In Switzerland, for example,
demand for the 1,000 franc bill (about $1,000) has increased sharply.
These large denomination bills now account for 60% of the Swiss
currency in circulation.
The
response of depositors to negative interest rates has resulted in
neoliberal economists, such as Larry Summers, calling for the
elimination of large denomination bank notes in order to make it
difficult for people to keep their cash balances outside of banks.
Other
neoliberal economists, such as Kenneth Rogoff want to eliminate cash
altogether and have only electronic money. Electronic money cannot be
removed from bank deposits except by spending it. With electronic
money as the only money, financial institutions can use negative
interest rates in order to steal the savings of their depositors.
People
would attempt to resort to gold, silver, and forms of private money,
but other methods of payment and saving would be banned, and
government would conduct sting operations in order to suppress
evasions of electronic money with stiff penalties.
What
this picture shows is that government, economists, and presstitutes
are allied against citizens achieving any financial independence from
personal saving. Policymakers have a crackpot economic policy and
those with control over your life value their scheme more than they
value your welfare.
This
is the fate of people in the so-called democracies. Any remaining
control that they have over their lives is being taken away.
Governments serve a few powerful interest groups whose agendas result
in the destruction of the host economies.
The
offshoring of middle class jobs transfers income and wealth from the
middle class to the executives and owners of the corporation, but it
also kills the domestic consumer market for the offshored goods and
services. As Michael Hudson writes, it kills the host. The
financialization of the economy also kills the host and the owners of
corporations as well. When corporate executives borrow from banks in
order to boost share prices and their performance bonuses by buying
back the publicly held stock of the corporations, future profits are
converted into interest payments to banks. The future income streams
of the corporations are financialized. If the future income streams
fail, the companies can be foreclosed, like homeowners, and the banks
become the owners of the corporations.
Between
the offshoring of jobs and the conversion of more and more income
streams into payments to banks, less and less is available to be
spent on goods and services. Thus, the economy fails to grow and
falls into long-term decline. Today many Americans can only pay the
minimum payment on their credit card balance. The result is massive
growth in a balance that can never be paid off. It is these people
who are the least able to service debt who are hit with draconian
charges. The way the credit card companies have it now, if you make
one late payment or your payment is returned by your bank, you are
hit for the next six months with a Penalty Annual Percentage Rate of
29.49%.
In
Europe entire countries are being foreclosed. Greece and Portugal
have been forced into liquidation of national assets and the social
security systems. So many women have been forced into poverty and
prostitution that the hourly price of a prostitute has been driven
down to $4.12.
Throughout
the Western world the financial system has become an exploiter of the
people and a deadweight loss on economies. There are only two
possible solutions. One is to break the large banks up into smaller
and local entities such as existed prior to the concentration that
deregulation fostered. The other is to nationalize them and operate
them solely in the interest of the general welfare of the population.
The
banks are too powerful currently for either solution to occur. But
the greed, fraud, and self-serving behavior of Western financial
systems, aided and abeted by governments, could be leading to such a
breakdown of economic life that the idea of a private financial
system will become as abhorent in the future as Nazism is today.
'Love
affair' with negative rates ends as central banks step back from
global currency wars
12
March, 2016
he
world’s most powerful central banks will come under renewed to
pressure to regain control over the global economy this week as faith
in extraordinary monetary stimulus fades.
Following
last week's shock and awe stimulus blitz from the ECB , nervy
investors will turn their attention on the US and Japan amid
speculation that central banks' brief "love affair" with
endless interest rate cuts is over.
Five
of the world's major monetary authorities, including the ECB, Swedish
Riksbank and Bank of Japan, have resorted to sub-zero rates in a bid
to weaken their currencies and stoke inflation.
Last
week Mario Draghi, ECB president, announced a three pronged interest
rate cut, including another 10 basis point reduction to its deposit
rate to -0.4pc.
But
Mr Draghi stressed the bank was not willing to slash interest rates
to as "low as we want", instead turning to unconventional
tools such as quantitative easing to stimulate demand.
His
comments sent the euro rocketing by 3pc from its weekly low to
$1.1148 against the dollar.
"The
ECB's love affair with negative rates has ended", said Michael
Hartnett, chief investment strategist at Bank of America Merrill
Lynch.
“Central
banks have played the rates card as aggressively as they can. The ECB
is done and the Bank of Japan has nothing in the tank.”
Negative
interest rates - widely seen as a central bank ploy to depreciate
their currencies - have been called a "dangerous experiment"
due to their adverse impact on the profitability of retail banks.
But
any new found reticence to continue slashing rates below zero
suggests policymakers are also wary of stoking international currency
wars after the issue was raised by the US during a G20 finance
ministers meeting in Shanghai last month, said Simon Derrick at BNY
Mellon.
Bank
of England governor Mark Carney has said central bank action to
stimulate domestic activity with negative rates was a "zero sum
game" for the world.
"At
the global zero bound, there is no free lunch" he said at the
G20.
The
comments suggest Mr Carney believes "that the use of negative
deposit rates in this fashion bordered on currency manipulation"
said Mr Derrick.
Maxime
Alimi, senior economist at AXA Investment Managers, said the ECB has
now all but given up on trying to manipulate the currency in favour
of boosting growth through QE.
"The
ECB no longer counts on a weaker euro to raise inflation, perhaps for
fear of a reaction from the Federal Reserve," said Mr Alimi.
Responding
to claims the ECB is involved in competitive devaluation, Mr Draghi
launched a staunch defence of his actions.
"The
ECB has never ever started [a currency war]. Our measurs are entirely
addressed to our domestic economy. We are not in this war at all."
Mapped:
Where in the world have rates turned negative?
On
Monday, the Bank of Japan is expected to refrain from slashing
interest rates a month after its foray into sub-zero territory sent
investors into a tailspin.
Relaunching
its bid to fight off low inflation, the ECB also bolstered bond
purchases by $20bn to $80bn-a-month and will allow retail banks to
borrow cheap loans at negative rates - moves described as “throwing
the kitchen sink” at the moribund eurozone.
But
despite exceeding expectations, markets took fright at Mr Draghi’s
hint that interest rates would fall no further for now.
Central
banks have played the rates card as aggressively as they can. The ECB
is done and the BoJ has nothing in the tank
Michael
Hartnett, BaML
Germany’s
DAX index lost 2.3pc in a turbulent day of trading - suggesting
central bank action is losing its magic touch, said Mr Harnett.
Investor
reaction - which also saw oil prices fall and gold soar - “screamed
of 'quantitative failure’”, he said.
The
febrile market environment means the US Federal Reserve, which was on
course to raise interest rates four times this year, is set to hold
fire on another hike at its March policy meeting on Wednesday.
Investors
are now pricing in just a 4pc chance the Fed will implement another
25 basis point rate hike this week. US policymakers have also
jettisoned their target to lift rates to as high as 1.25pc by the end
of 2016, fearing the spillover effects of tighter policy and a
rising dollar on the rest of the world.
Fed
governor Lael Brainard has warned against the US diverging too far
from its peers in the developed world. She argued now was a good time
for “policymakers to reaffirm their commitment to work toward the
common goal of strengthening global demand”.
In
the UK, the Bank of England will have kept interest rates at their
record low of 0.5pc for seven years when the Monetary Policy
Committee meets on Thursday.
Cash-strapped
oil companies are officially in scramble mode.
U.S.
oil and gas companies are trying to survive the crash in oil prices
by selling stock to investors at a record-setting pace to raise cash.
The
wave of additional stock sales from these publicly-traded companies
highlights the enormous amount of stress and fear in the oil patch
right now.
Cheap
oil has already forced drilling and exploration companies to
dramatically cut costs by laying off workers, shelving expensive
projects and even ditching their coveted dividends.
With
oil prices stuck below $40 a barrel, companies are racing to quiet
bankruptcy fears. And to do that they have to raise cash -- fast. The
preferred method usually is to sell bonds. But that's not an option
for many companies that are already loaded up on too much debt taken
on during the good times.
Bond
Central Banks Deutsche Bank Excess Reserves Global Economy Monetary
Policy Money Supply Money Velocity Unemployment
Negative
interest rates may or may not be a thing of the past (many thought
that the ECB had learned its lesson, and then Vitor Constancio wrote
a blog post showing that the ECB hasn't learned a damn thing), but
the confusion about their significance remains. Here is Deutsche
Bank's Dominic Konstam explaining how, among many other things
including why Europe will need to "tax" cash before this
final Keynesian experiment is finally over, negative rates are merely
the logical failure of globalization.
For
the past month, the price of oil has soared by a 50% on no
fundamental catalyst; in fact, the "fundamental" situation
has gotten progressively worse with the record oil inventory glut
increasing by the day even as US crude oil production posted a modest
rebound in the past week after two months of declines, while the much
touted OPEC/non-OPEC oil production freeze has yet to be discussed,
let alone implemented.
With
or without a valid catalyst, however, the short squeeze price action
has drastically changed not only investor psychology, but that of the
IEA as well, which on Friday announced that oil may have bottomed (if
the agency's predictive track record is any indication, oil is about
to crash).
But
while traders, algos and CNBC guest "commodity experts" may
be certain that oil will never drop to $27 again, someone else is not
at all convinced that oil prices will not drop again: oil producers
themselves.....
Greenspan Explains The Fed's Miserable Track Record: "We Didn't Forecast Better Because We Can't"
"This
is a reason why the Board is getting an unfair rap on this stuff. We
didn’t forecast better than anyone else; we
regulated banks that got in trouble like anyone else. Could
we have done better? Yes, if we could forecast better. But we can’t.
This is why I’m very uncomfortable with the idea of a systemic
regulator, because they can’t forecast better"
"Gloom" Returns To China's Economy: Industrial Production, Retail Sales Miss Lowest Estimates
After
an unprecedented surge in Chinese attempts to stimulate the economy
in late 2015, mostly on the fiscal side, coupled with recent monetary
easing by the PBOC which cut the banks' reserve ratio recently and
unleashed a tsunami of new loan creation in January, many expected
that this unprecedented credit impulse would translate into at least
a modest rebound for the economy, prompting a stable pick up in
spending for the economy which many are touting is now
consumer-spending driven as opposed to export and production.
However,
that did not happen: according to data released overnight by the
National Bureau of Statistics, Chinese factories and retailers not
only missed expectations, but slowed down materially from the
December prints, as anemic demand and excess capacity continued to
bear down on the world’s second-largest economy.
Specifically,
Jan-Feb factory output grew just 5.4% in January and February from a
year earlier, data released by the National Bureau of Statistics
(NBS) showed, slowing from a 5.9% rise in December to
the weakest since November 2008;
the print matched the lowest Wall Street estimate.
Meanwhile,
retail sales rose 10.2% over the two-month period from a year
ago, below
the lowest Wall Street estimate of 10.5%, and
far below the December’s 11.1% increase, pushing the trend growth
in this series to lows not seen since early 2015.
"Overall,
the picture is still quite gloomy," said Commerzbank AG
economist Zhou Hao. “Normally, because of Chinese New Year, there’s
a big drop and a big jump. This year there’s only a big drop.”
The
retail data was particularly disappointing because
as the WSJ writes "while
industries have been battered by the economic slowdown, retail sales
have been relatively buoyant, so the downtick surprised some
economists, especially since it occurred around the Lunar New Year
holiday when consumption is usually strong."
And
to think record, if fake, box office numbers were supposed to carry
China's economy in the aftermath of the absolutely disastrous trade
data released earlier in the month.
To
be sure, the commentary immediately explained that the weak data will
mean even more stimulus, even though it was just last week when the
Congress laid out all the measures that China will adopt to assure
"GDP growth" of 6.5%-7.0%.
Here's Reuters:
"China's activity data remained weak in the first two months of
2016, with factory output growth hitting the weakest since the global
financial crisis, keeping
pressure on policymakers to do more to avert a sharper showdown in
the world's second-largest economy."
Unlike
the recent collapse in Chinese exports and imports, the overnight
data could not be "explained away" due to calendar effects
as it combines the January and February timeframe: China's government
combines some economic data for January and February to
minimize distortions tied to the Lunar New Year holiday, which falls
during those two months. It
was in early February this year.
It
wasn't all bad news: one area that did pick up was investment in
factories, buildings and other fixed assets, which increased a
faster-than-expected at 10.2?% year-over-year in January and
February, compared with a 10% increase for all of 2015. However,
economists said that boost came largely from government spending on
infrastructure and from investment in parts of the overbuilt property
market.
In
other words, China is adding even more excess capacity to an economy
already drowning in excess capacity.
Ultimately,
the problem for China remains: weak demand at home and abroad is
weighing on industries and many factories continue to churn out
unneeded goods. "A recovery is still eluding China’s
industrial sector,” Mizuho Securities Asia Ltd. said in a recent
report, before the release of the data Saturday.
Worse,
for all the talk about a massive stimulus, China's economy continues
to deteriorate: as quoted by the WSJ, Chen Zhenxing, sales manager
with Zhejiang Lanxi Shanye Machinery Co., which produces hand carts
and other logistics equipment in the eastern city of Jinhua, said his
company faces ongoing problems raising capital and boosting prices:
"competition is cutthroat,” he said.
“Too
many companies make products that are pretty much the same, so the
focus turns to lowering prices."
Ultimately
many will have to go out of business, leading to millions in layoffs,
and forcing the Beijing politburo to face its greatest nightmare.
The
problem with China's economy is that the local population,
having tired of the stock market bubble, has now shifted its
attention back to reflating the housing bubble, where as we reported
recently there has been an unprecedented 50% surge in some Tier 1
cities such as Shenzen. As such the economy is focused not on
creating new goods and services, but merely facilitating
financialization and extracting rents.
This
is why China's leaders have now put all their eggs in the housing
market basket: Zhang Yiping, an economist with China Merchants
Securities, said property investment and domestic consumption could
be China’s major growth drivers this year given sluggish global
demand and Beijing’s plans to cut industrial overcapacity.
Commerzbank’s
Mr. Zhou and other economists expressed concern that investment is
flowing into a few real-estate markets that show signs of
overheating, rather than into new ventures. “Monetary
policy is relaxed, but it’s reluctant to go to the real economy,
only to property assets,” he
said.
The
slower pace of retail sales in January and February may reflect the
turbulent financial markets and weak corporate profits last year,
which dampened wage hikes and bonuses, economists said.
Even
accounting for data volatility around the Lunar New Year holiday,
China’s economy is off to a slow start this year following economic
growth in 2015 of 6.9%, the slowest pace in 25 years. A host of
stimulus measures late last year and into 2016—most recently a 0.5
percentage point cut in bank reserves late last month, have yet to
reverse the slide in momentum.
The
biggest problem, one which we have warned about since 2010, is that
China remains mired under an unprecedented debt load, one which makes
any forecast for 6.5% growth on the back of credit which is growing
at double this pace, laughable.
What The Average Zhou Thinks Of China's Housing Bubble: "Only After War Breaks Out, We'll Be Able To Afford It"
Chinese
home prices are soaring. In fact, according to the latest data, the
bubble among China's top, or "Tier 1" cities has never been
bigger entirely at the expense of all other cities.
And
while this appears at first glance a positive, for central-planners
and leveraged speculators, we wondered what the man on the street of
Beijing thought of it.
Policies
by Chinese authorities to stimulate the country’s housing market
have contributed to sky-high prices in some big cities such as
Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen – with developers and real estate
agents adding to the craze. What do Beijing residents make of the
current market? Do they fear that a property bubble might be on the
horizon?....
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.