CLIMATE CHANGE FUELS BOKO HARAM
By Nafeez Ahmed
Boko Haram, Nigeria’s homegrown Islamist terror group, continues to rampage across the country with growing impunity. Since its emergence in 2009, the group has killed 20,000 people and forced over 2.5 million Nigerians from their homes.
Women Across Frontiers,
29 February, 2016
Its expansion has been aided by growing ties with more established terrorist networks, especially al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), providing the group with “training and material support” according to the UN Security Council. Last year, Boko Haram pledged allegiance to the Islamic State (ISIS), active in parts of Iraq and Syria.
29 February, 2016
Its expansion has been aided by growing ties with more established terrorist networks, especially al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), providing the group with “training and material support” according to the UN Security Council. Last year, Boko Haram pledged allegiance to the Islamic State (ISIS), active in parts of Iraq and Syria.
Boko
Haram’s Islamist agenda is distinctively anti-women. Over the last
three years the group has abducted over 2,000 women and girls, sold
them or given them as “reward” to their fighters. Two years ago,
the group garnered international notoriety for abducting 276
Nigerian schoolgirls in 2014. Since then, Boko Haram has vowed to
ban all girls from attending school so that they can serve the
husbands to whom they are—often forcibly—married.
But
the brutal oppression of women by Boko Haram is only one dimension
of the marginalization of women in Nigeria, which is worsening in
the context of the civil conflict, and deepening social crises.
From
1996 to 2010, the percentage of Nigerians below the national poverty
line rose from 65 to 69 percent. In 2010, inequality, as measured by
the Gini coefficient, rose from 0.429 in 2004 to 0.447 in 2010.
Nigerians
in rural areas have it worse, with 66 percent of the rural
population living below one US dollar a day. “Malnutrition is
widespread. Rural areas and disadvantaged groups are particularly
vulnerable to chronic food shortages and unbalanced nutrition.”
Women
and children are the ones most affected by this extreme poverty.
Nigeria is ranked 79 out of 86 in the OECD’s 2012 Social
Institutions and Gender Index, and 120 out of 135 countries in the
World Economic Forum’s 2011 Global Gender Gap Index. Over a third
of all Nigerian children are stunted, and nearly a quarter
underweight.
The
Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Africa Economic Outlook report
recently concluded that, “Gender gaps are notable in access to
education as well as political representation. Although school
participation has been improving at the primary level, the
proportion of girls enrolled is still lower than boys across all
levels of education, with the ratio decreasing at tertiary levels.”
Yet
although Nigeria is Africa’s largest
economy,
“the growth has neither generated employment nor translated into
poverty reduction nor addressed inequality in Nigeria,” according
to the ADB.
The
country’s economic contradictions are an ideal showcase of the
failures of IMF and World Bank neoliberal reforms. “Nigeria’s
uncritical embrace of Western-style neoliberal economic policy
largely undermined the country’s quest for a sustainable economic
development,” writes Nigerian
scholar, Olumide Victor Ekanad of Redeemers University in Ogun
State.
Petrocide
There
are two further interlinked systemic pressures in play: resource
depletion and climate change.
According
to a 2013 report commissioned by the UK Department for International
Development (DFID), Nigeria’s crude oil production has decreased
since its peak in 2005, largely due to the impact of internal
conflicts, leading to the withdrawal of oil companies and lack of
investments. Since then production has fluctuated along a plateau.
The
DFID report noted that new offshore fields might bring additional
oil on-stream, surpassing the 2005 peak – but also noted that
rising domestic demand “at some point in the future may cut into
the amount of oil available for export.”
The
drop in investment has been compounded by the new economics of
unconventional oil: higher production costs, a supply glut due to
the need for faster and more frequent drilling, and consequently
lower market prices.
With
Nigeria’s population expected to rise from 160 to 250 million by
2025 and oil accounting for some 96 percent of export revenue as
well as 75 percent of government revenue. the government has had to
adopt harsh austerity measures.
Sharp reductions in public spending, power cuts, fuel shortages and conditional new loans are likely to exacerbate economic inequalities and stoke further the popular grievances that feed groups like Boko Haram in the North.
Sharp reductions in public spending, power cuts, fuel shortages and conditional new loans are likely to exacerbate economic inequalities and stoke further the popular grievances that feed groups like Boko Haram in the North.
This
is hardly a new pattern. Nigeria’s history of neoliberal austerity
and growth for the few has played a key role in driving young
unemployed men into the arms of Islamist militants.
Compounding
these systemic crises is a factor whose potentially devastating
effects we are only beginning to understand: climate change.
Last
year, a study in the American International Journal of Social
Science found that
the inadequacy of the government’s climate adaptation programs led
to “exposure of the vast population of farmers in northern Nigeria
to harsh environmental effects, consequently generating conflict.”
Study
author Chukwuma Onyia, a former staffer in the Economic Community of
West African States (ECOWAS), argued that “Nigerian’s
over-dependency on crude oil rents, coupled with the behavior of
political elites and the people-unfriendly market liberalizations
foisted on Nigeria by the World Bank and IMF derailed the
developmental focus of the state, and increasingly weakened its
capacity to adapt to a changing climate, particularly in arid
northern Nigeria.”
The
failure to respond to Nigeria’s changing climate generated
increased drought and desertification, in turn leading to “decreased
agricultural production, economic decline; population displacement
and disruption of legitimized authoritative institutions and social
relations.” The net effect was an acceleration of the
attractiveness of groups like “Boko Haram and other forms of
Jihadi ideology,”
resulting in escalating “herder-farmer clashes emanating from the north since 1980s.”
resulting in escalating “herder-farmer clashes emanating from the north since 1980s.”
Indeed, the rapid spread of Boko Haram coincided with the shrinking of the region’s Lake Chad from 25,000 km squared in 1963 to less than 2,500 km squared, a phenomenon driven largely by climate change. At this rate, Lake Chad is set to dry up completely within 20 years.
The
disappearance of Lake Chad has led millions of people to lose their
livelihoods. The result has been a groundswell of discontent,
waiting for an outlet.
“Living
in poverty in Nigeria’s deeply unequal society, this situation
breeds the kind of resentments that make both the educated and
uneducated easily attracted to radical new religious movements,
particularly those that preach equality and adherence to simple and
pure religious values,” writes Ayo
Obe, Vice-Chair of the International Crisis Group’s Board of
Trustees.
“In
this century, Boko Haram has emerged in Maiduguri as a new magnet
both for uneducated youths displaced from their traditional
livelihoods, and for educated youths attracted to its egalitarian,
anti-corruption preaching. Moreover, Boko Haram had shrewdly
established economic programs to provide means of employment,
augmenting the group’s allure for the region’s disillusioned
youth.”
But
the government has failed to address these deeper issues, focusing
instead overwhelmingly on short-sighted military responses. This has
led to the indiscriminate killings of innocent civilians and, at
times, the deliberate targeting of
peaceful protestors.
In
a 2015 report,
Amnesty International reported that 7,000 men and boys as young as
nine have died in Nigerian military detention from starvation,
suffocation and torture. A further 1,200 were extrajudicially killed
and a total of 20,000 young men and boys as young as nine years
old have been arbitrarily arrested and detained by the Nigerian
military as part of its ‘war on terror’, mostly without charge.
Women,
already facing gender discrimination in Nigeria, now face a
worsening predicament caught between the misogyny of Boko Haram and
the state’s resort to increasingly brutal and counterproductive
counter-insurgency measures.
As Human Rights Watch Watch reports, in responding to Boko Haram attacks, Nigerian security forces have “used excessive force, burned homes, engaged in physical abuse, ‘disappeared’ victims, and extra-judicially killed those suspected of supporting Boko Haram.” Many of the victims of these crimes are women: “Few members of the security forces implicated in serious violations of humanitarian and human rights law, including violations against girls and women, have been prosecuted.”
As
Western governments contemplate increasing military aid to Nigeria,
they are overlooking the inevitable: the escalating insurgency is
largely a symptom of endemic corruption, a failed economic system,
and the protracted collapse of state institutions as a result of
their inability to provide basic services to its impoverished
population.
As
these crises tear apart the fabric of Nigerian society, an extremist
movement with a simplistic moral certainty and utopian promises is
exploiting this deep discontent.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.