There is no doubt about the geopolitics involved in US-led moves against the very real corruption in FIFA.
However, I am disappointed (but not surprised) at the reluctance of Peter Lavelle and his guests to acknowledge the elephant in the room - which is the movement to ban Israel from FIFA - as is clear from this article
There is very little on this and nobody is joining the dots but the implication is clear -
Fifa
president Sepp Blatter arrives in Jerusalem to seek compromise, as
Israeli football authorities insist that ‘no laws or rules’ have
been broken
The
rise and fall of Sepp Blatter or the blood-sport known as Fifa
politicking? Fans call football ‘The Beautiful Game’, but behind
the scenes it is a ruthless gambit for geopolitical advantage and
mega-profits – and corruption. Is this the reason why the FBI is
involved? CrossTalking with Bruce Zagaris, Neil Clark, and Sukant
Chandan
'
Forget
Sports: Geopolitics is Behind the FIFA Scandal As the War Against
Russia Enters a New Front
By
Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
5
June, 2015
There
is no question that there is a lot of corruption inside the
Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). Bribes
and behind the scene deals have been going on for decades. The sport
federation is responsible for the most watched and popular sport in
the world and is part of a lucrative business venture that has a lot
of soft power and prestige attached to it.
The
scandal and arrests that have taken place in 2015, however, have
nothing to do with corruption and everything to do with geopolitics.
Welcome to the soccer/football front! FIFA has become another arena
for the multi-spectrum war being fought by the US and its
allies against countries like Russia. The energy and currency wars
are now being augmented by a behind the scenes war at FIFA. Joseph
Blatter or Sepp is a casualty of this war.
As
far back as 2005, Blatter has refused to get embroiled in
Washington’s geopolitical chess game(s). Under him FIFA refused to
surrender to the US Department of State’s demands that Iran’s
team be blocked from participating in World Cup 2006 or demands that
Palestine not be admitted into FIFA. FIFA’s geopolitical offenses,
however, may have reached a tipping point.
FIFA’s
consideration of Palestinian requests to suspend Israel, on the basis
of Israeli sabotage and attacks against the Palestinian team, as item
fifteen of the agenda of its 65th Congress could have been one of
these offenses. Days before the 65th FIFA Congress was to take place,
however, Blatter meet with both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu and Palestinian quasi-dictator Mahmoud Abbas to reach some
type of understanding. This may be the basis for the withdrawal of
the Palestinian Football Association’s motion to suspend the
Israeli Football Association from FIFA.
Not
only were both the US and Britain upset that they were not awarded
the statuses of hosting World Cup 2018 and World Cup 2022, but they
have been pressuring FIFA against Russia. What may have led to
Washington’s campaign to remove Blatter by organizing a coup inside
FIFA against the FIFA boss was FIFA’s refusal to sanction Russia by
getting on board with the US and EU program against Moscow.
Washington’s
Attack on FIFA
Just
days after he was re-elected on May 29, 2015 to continue heading FIFA
for a fifth term by the majority of delegates at the 65th FIFA
Congress, Joseph Blatter took the unusual step of announcing that he
was stepping down as the international sport federation’s president
on June 2, 2015. The move was unusual, because up until his May
re-election Blatter had managed to overcome the pressure and attempts
by the US and its allies to force him to resign from the presidency
of FIFA. He announced that he had taken the decision because he did
not have everyone’s support for his continued presidency in FIFA
during a press conference at FIFA’s headquarters in Zurich,
Switzerland.
One
hundred and thirty-three out of two hundred and nine association
representatives at the 65th FIFA Congress voted for Blatter in the
first round of voting at the Hallenstadion in Zurich. This amounts to
63.6%, or roughly 64%, of the FIFA Congress. Since this number was
just short of two-thirds or 66% of FIFA’s voting members needed to
secure a first round win, a second round of voting was to commence.
FIFA
Vice-President for Asia and runner-up, Prince Ali bin Al-Hussein bin
Al-Talal bin Abdullah, had no chance of winning and dropped out of
the election before a second round of voting took place. Prince
Ali had managed to secure only seventy-three votes in the first
round. This means that 34.9% (approximately 35%) of FIFA supported
Prince Ali’s bid to run FIFA as its new president.
Despite
the fact that he had secured the support of the majority of
soccer/football associations at the FIFA elections, Blatter was still
coerced into announcing his resignation. After his re-election by the
65th FIFA Congress, reports published by the New
York Times,
ABC News, and Reuters all
announced that Blatter was now being criminally investigated by US
authorities. «Blatter had for days tried to distance himself from
the controversy, but several United States officials, speaking on the
condition of anonymity,» admitted that they wanted to build a case
against him by using FIFA colleagues of his that they had arrested
earlier (Sam Borden, Michael S. Schmidt, and Matt Apuzzo, «Sepp
Blatter Decides to Resign as FIFA President in About-Face,» New
York Times,
2 June 2015).
Prior
to the investigation on Blatter, the US had the Swiss police arrest
seven FIFA officials at the Hotel Baur au Lac in Zurich on May 27,
2015. These officials were in Zurich preparing to cast their ballots
for the FIFA elections. They were arrested on «suspicions» of
corruption and extradited to the US by Switzerland.
The
US actually accelerated its investigation even while a separate probe
was being conducted by the authorities in Switzerland as to how FIFA
awarded World Cup 2018 to Russia and World Cup 2022 to Qatar. This is
the crux of the matter. FIFA was not willing to rescind its decisions
and follow Washington’s geopolitical script against Russia.
The
timing of the raids and arrests occurred twenty-four hours before
FIFA’s elections. The arrests were deliberately planned to prevent
Blatter from being re-elected. Blatter responded by saying, «No one
is going to tell me that it was a simple coincidence, this American
attack two days before the elections of FIFA. It doesn’t smell
good.»
The
Politicization of FIFA: Dividing the World
The
contours of geopolitical rivalries and divisions are
manifesting themselves in FIFA. While El Salvador and Honduras fought
a war ignited by soccer/football in 1969, what is happening behind
the scenes with the FIFA scandal is giving new meaning to
«Soccer/Football War.»
Although
the voting at the Hallenstadion was conducted by secret ballot, there
is a general understanding of how the FIFA delegates and regional
confederacies voted. Aside from Australia, all forty-seven
members of the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) are believed to
have voted for Blatter. The AFC made strong statements of support for
Blatter since the scandal broke. The fifty-four members of the
Confédération Africaine de Football/Confederation of African
Football (CAF), which is the largest FIFA confederation, also all
voted for Blatter and made strong shows of support for him like the
AFC.
The
Union des Associations Européennes de Football/Union of European
Football Associations (UEFA) and the US on the other hand were
hostile towards Blatter. EU politicians, including British Prime
Minister David Cameron, had been demanding he resign as the president
of FIFA. UEFA even threatened to cut ties with FIFA if Blatter was
re-elected. The English Football Association also called for a
boycott of the World Cup. The campaign against Blatter reached a
point where Sepp said that UEFA was involved in an unnecessary
demonization campaign.
UEFA,
however, was not united against Blatter. «UEFA is divided: a quarter
of its members apparently voted for Mr Blatter, defying a plea from
Michel Platini, UEFA’s head, to oust the Swiss septuagenarian.
Among those who backed the incumbent were Russia, Spain and, less
predictably, France, Mr Platini’s own country. So UEFA action is,
alas, unlikely to extend much beyond removing co-operation from FIFA
committees,» the Economist reported
(«Untangling FIFA’s mysteries,» 2 June 2015).
Aware
of what was happening behind the scenes, the Russian Federation, at
both the FIFA level and the political level of the Kremlin, voiced
its strong support for Joseph Blatter. Vladimir Putin even leapt to
support Blatter. Aside from France, Spain, and Russia, as many as
eighteen UEFA members, including Armenia, Belarus, Finland, and
Kazakhstan are believed to have supported Blatter during the voting
in Zurich («‘Little point’ to divided Uefa talks on Sepp
Blatter, says Dutch football association,»Dutch
News,
2 June 2015).
The
US and Canada were also isolated among the Confederation of North,
Central America, and Caribbean Association Football (CONCACAF). The
CONCACAF countries of Central America and the Caribbean put their
support behind Blatter.
Are
the US and EU Fighting Corruption or Fighting Democratization in
FIFA?
In
Orwellian terms, the press in the US and Britain have tried to
portray Blatter’s projects to enhance the standing of
soccer/football in Africa and Asia through investment and development
projects as a form of «bribery.» Even critics admit that the equal
division of profits between the two hundred and nine members of FIFA
generated by revenues and tournaments «has prompted many a genuine
football revolution in the developing world» (Tom Peck, «Fifa
corruption: How Sepp Blatter buys support by investing Fifa’s
millions in Africa,» Independent [London],
28 May 2015).
Mauritania
provides an excellent case study of how the equal division of profits
among all of FIFA’s members, starting in 2013, has helped poorer
countries improve the standing of soccer/football. To enhance the
profile of the sport, studios were built to provide Mauritanians the
opportunity to watch the sport from television. Two paragraphs
published in the Independent (ibid)
relay what occurred:
• «We
now have a TV production unit, one of the first of its kind in
Africa,» explained the president of the Mauritanian Football
Association, Ahmed Ould Yahya, at the time. «We’ve signed a
contract with the national broadcasting company and we show matches
every week. That is really changing the image of the game in the
country.»
• Before
the money arrived, Mauritanian football had effectively collapsed. It
had never played in an international tournament, and fallen out of
the world rankings. It is still struggling, but now it also has
pitches and facilities, all paid for by Fifa. Mauritania has never
played in a World Cup, but has had its share of the profits. All 209
Fifa member nations receive an equal share of the income from the
tournament in Brazil in 2014, around $1.2m (£783,000).
The
above is being billed as a form of bribery. Not once is the deep
corruption involved in UEFA or the European Union ever mentioned.
This has prompted observations that aside from geopolitics, this is
an issue of power and economics. The following excerpt illustrates
this point: «‘The past two editions of the World Cup have been
played in South Africa and Brazil. The next one is in Russia. All
three are BRICS countries. It’s obvious that the west is not very
happy with this.
All this talk about corruption is an attempt by Europe and America to bring the game back into their sphere of influence,’ says Thiago Cassis, a reputed Brazilian football writer. ‘There is a lot of corruption in European football too. They do not talk about it. This whole game is not about tackling corruption, but regaining control…» (Shobhan Saxena, «Make No Mistake, the FIFA War is Not About Football or Corruption,» Wire, 31 May 2015).
All this talk about corruption is an attempt by Europe and America to bring the game back into their sphere of influence,’ says Thiago Cassis, a reputed Brazilian football writer. ‘There is a lot of corruption in European football too. They do not talk about it. This whole game is not about tackling corruption, but regaining control…» (Shobhan Saxena, «Make No Mistake, the FIFA War is Not About Football or Corruption,» Wire, 31 May 2015).
«Dependent
on South America and Africa for football talent, and, increasingly
Asia for TV audiences, the Europeans know they are losing control»
of soccer/football, the Brazilian journalist Shobhan Saxena has noted
(ibid).
«Europe wants to import all the labour from us because that
gives them a global TV audience and lots of money. But they do not
want to give us World Cups or share any power with us,» a FIFA
delegate from Africa at the 65th FIFA Congress has explained in this
regard (iid).
The
Reason Behind the FIFA Arrests: Pressuring Latin America against
Russia
All
the FIFA officials arrested before the elections in Zurich were Latin
Americans from Central America and South America. Aside from their
own corruption investigations, this has prompted both resentment and
backlash in CONCACAF and the Confederación Sudamericana de
Fútbol/South American Football Confederation (CONMEBOL).
The
Wire gives
the Latin American perspective on why the US and its allies targeted
the Latin Americans in FIFA. «Why did they arrest officials only
from our federations and that too in Switzerland? Why didn’t they
approach our governments through Interpol? Is it because they knew
that extradition from South America to US is impossible?» one of
Brazil’s soccer/football official asks (iid).
This
account points to an organized effort to derail FIFA with a coup:
«There was also anger about reports in the western media about the
CBF chief Marco Polo Del Nero ‘fleeing’ Zurich for Brazil as he
‘feared’ arrest. In fact, when papers like the Guardian and New
York Times were
reporting Del Nero’s ‘escape’ from the FIFA meeting, the
Brazilian official was still in Switzerland. ‘They brought all this
pressure on us to force us to vote for Prince Ali. They have been
lobbying with us for months. When they didn’t see it working, they
conducted the raid followed by veiled threats to others that they
could be arrested too. Some British and American journalists were
part of this pressure tactic,’ the Brazilian official alleged»
(iid).
Rescinding
the Selection of Russia as the Venue for World Cup 2018
What
it comes down to is World Cup 2018 in Russia. The Latin American
perspective is the following: «From the versions of the Zurich raid
given by some South American officials, it appears that the FBI,
Swiss police and a few western reporters hunted them together,»
Saxena reports (ibid).
He was also told by one FIFA delegate from South America that the US
was trying to pressure the Latin Americans. «As the Asian and
African vote was solidly behind Blatter, they wanted the votes from
the Americas for Prince Ali. They were desperate to make the prince
the new chief of FIFA as he could re-open the bids for the 2018 and
2022 tournaments,» testifies the Paraguayan official (ibid).
«Since the UK and the US lost the 2018 and 2022 bids respectively,
they have been working to somehow cancel the World Cups in Russia and
Qatar. They haven’t accepted the fact that they lost the bids in a
fair contest» the same official has explained (iid).
Prince
Ali, who is also the head of both the Jordanian Football Association
and the West Asian Football Federation, was the candidate that
Blatter’s opponents in the US and Britain had put forward to
implement their agenda. The US, Britain, and the leadership of UEFA
had for months been actively lobbying for Prince Ali against Sepp
Blatter. True to his pedigree, like the other so-called «royals» of
the Hashemite scion in Jordan, Prince Ali is a puppet or a
«stooge» that represents US and British interests as one anonymous
Brazilian official told Saxena in an interview (iid).
The
whole FIFA scandal is not about corruption or dignity. The whole
affair is about geopolitics and managing the world. Joseph Blatter
was forced to step down because FIFA refused to cancel its decision
to allow Russia to host World Cup 2018 and to reopen the bids for
hosting World Cup 2018 and World Cup 2022.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.