One call for extermination could be seen as an aberration.
More than that, especially if it comes from the Deputy Speaker of Israel's Knesset is a tendency.
This is the voice of nazism, little different from similar voices in Ukraine
More than that, especially if it comes from the Deputy Speaker of Israel's Knesset is a tendency.
This is the voice of nazism, little different from similar voices in Ukraine
Moshe
Feiglin calls for concentration camps in Gaza and ‘conquest of Gaza
Strip’
Moshe Feiglin, Deputy Speaker of the Israeli Knesset and member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, posted the inflammatory message on his Facebook page.
4
August, 2014
Israeli official calls for concentration camps in Gaza and ‘the conquest of the entire Gaza Strip, and annihilation of all fighting forces and their supporters’
- Moshe Feiglin is Deputy Speaker of the Israeli Knesset
- He posted the message on his Facebook page at the weekend
- Plan includes shipping the people living in Gaza across the world
- IDF would ‘exterminate nests of resistance’ as part of his plan
- The Gaza war has left more than 1,800 Palestinians dead
Moshe
Feiglin called for concentration camps in Gaza in his action plan
An
Israeli official has called for concentration camps in Gaza and ‘the
conquest of the entire Gaza Strip, and annihilation of all fighting
forces and their supporters’.
Moshe
Feiglin, Deputy Speaker of the Israeli Knesset and member of
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, posted the
inflammatory message on his Facebook page at the weekend.
He
lays out a detailed plan for the destruction of Gaza – which
includes shipping its residents across the world – in a letter he
addressed to the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu.
The
message, which received more than 2,000 likes on his page,
lists four action points which he wants to be enforced as soon as
possible.
Feiglin
details the first one as ‘defining the enemy’ and states: ‘The
strategic enemy is extremist Arab Islam in all its varieties, from
Iran to Gaza, which seeks to annihilate Israel in its entirety. The
immediate enemy is Hamas. (Not the tunnels, not the rockets, but
Hamas.)’
He
says another important part of his plan is the ‘conquest of the
entire Gaza Strip, and annihilation of all fighting forces and their
supporters.’
Moshe
Feiglin is Deputy Speaker of the Israeli Knesset and member of Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, and posted the
message on his Facebook page at the weekend
He
lays out a detailed plan for the destruction of Gaza – which
includes shipping its residents across the world – in a letter he
addressed to the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
The Gaza
war, now in its fourth week, has left more than 1,800 Palestinians
dead.
Feiglin
details how he wants the Israeli PM ‘to turn Gaza into Jaffa, a
flourishing Israeli city with a minimum number of hostile
civilians.’
In
1948 Jaffa was a Palestinian town but there was an exodus of most of
its Arab population when it fell to the fledgling Israeli army and
right-wing Jewish militias.
In
the letter he expresses his desire for the IDF to find areas on the
Sinai border to establish ‘tent encampments…until relevant
emigration destinations are determined.’
He
says that the supply of electricity and water to the Gaza would be
disconnected before being ‘shelled with maximum fire power.’
In
his plan the supply of electricity and water to the Gaza would be
disconnected before being ‘shelled with maximum fire power’
Feiglin
states: ‘The strategic enemy is extremist Arab Islam in all its
varieties, from Iran to Gaza, which seeks to annihilate Israel in
its entirety. The immediate enemy is Hamas. (Not the tunnels, not
the rockets, but Hamas.)’
Feiglin
explains how the IDF would then ‘exterminate nests of resistance,
in the event that any should remain.’
Establish
‘tent encampments…until relevant emigration destinations are
determined’
Part
of his plan includes shipping the people living in Gaza across the
world.
He
says to encourage the movement those who willingly agree to emigrate
will be given ‘a generous economic support package.’
But
those who resist leaving their home will be required to publicly
sign a declaration of loyalty to Israel, and receive a blue ID card
similar to that of the Arabs of East Jerusalem.
Then
Israeli law will be extended to cover the entire Gaza Strip and ‘the
city of Gaza and its suburbs will be rebuilt as true Israeli
touristic and commercial cities.’
A
second Gaza ceasefire collapsed in just six minutes this morning
after an Israeli F16 jet destroyed a house in a beach-side refugee
camp, killing an eight-year-old girl and wounding dozens.
Israel
announced the temporary ceasefire to facilitate the entry of
humanitarian aid and allow some of the hundreds of thousands of
Palestinians displaced by an almost four-week-old war to go home.
Hamas
said it would not be observing the truce, and warned people to
exercise extreme caution when venturing out onto the streets after
earlier temporary ceasefire arrangements collapsed into a frenzy of
bloodshed.
Feiglin’s
Facebook page is verifiable as it is linked from his official page
on the Knesset website.
Palestinians remove the body of an eight-year-old from the rubble from a house hit by an Israeli airstrike in the al-Shati refugee camp in Gaza City today
Times
of Israel Article: "When Genocide is Permissible" - Just a
Little Too Honest
Times
of Israel has since taken down the original article which defended
genocide as a legitimate tactic, but we have the cached version for
you to read.
4
August, 2014
On
August 1st, 2014, The Times of Israel posted one
of their most honest articles to date. In
it, the author openly made the case that in certain circumstances
genocide may not only be permissible, but in fact a necessary
component of government policy.
The
original article was taken down after the internet got hold of it and
began spreading it feverishly. However you can still access the
cached version of the page here.
The
title of the article "When Genocide is Permissible" by
itself was bad enough, but this wasn't a question of poor word
choice. It was the thesis. This is particularly evident in the
closing paragraph:
I
will conclude with a question for all the humanitarians out there.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu clearly stated at the outset of
this incursion that his objective is to restore a sustainable quiet
for the citizens of Israel. We have already established that it is
the responsibility of every government to ensure the safety and
security of its people. If
political leaders and military experts determine that the only way to
achieve its goal of sustaining quiet is through genocide is it then
permissible to achieve those responsible goals?
The
view point expressed here isn't unique to the author. What's unique
is that he seemed to be testing the waters to see if the public was
ready to bring the dark side of Zionism out of the closet. He seemed
to think that at this juncture in history genocide could go
mainstream with little more than a PR makeover. Unfortunately this
delusion is not entirely understandable considering the cultural
context within Israel. When you live in a society where crowds
hilltops and cheer after each bomb as Gaza is obliterated, you might
start to believe that everyone is ok with a few massacres here and
there, and after all, such thinking is institutionalized in Israeli
military doctrine. This
article by
Haretz further confirms this.
The
Times of Israel took the article down, and put up a disclaimer saying
that the article was a "blatant breach of editorial guidelines".
I'm not sure what their editorial guidelines entail, but they must
have something to do with choosing your words in order to hide the
full implications of what you are saying. To put is bluntly Yochanan
Gordon was chastised because he failed to match industry wide
propaganda standards.
No
PR disaster would be complete without a 180 degree reversal and a
"heartfelt" apology
from the author:
I
wish to express deep regret and beg forgiveness for an article I
authored which was posted on 5TJT.com, Times of Israel and was
tweeted and shared the world over.
I
never intended to call to harm any people although my words may have
conveyed that message.
With
that said I pray and hope for a quick peaceful end to the hostilities
and that all people learn to coexist with each other in creating a
better world for us all.
Yochanan
Gordon
I
don't know about you, but that got me all choked up. So nice to see
people who are capable of going from advocating genocide to praying
for peace, coexistence and a better world at the drop of the hat (or
a few thousand angry tweets).
And
always remember the real reason for this bombardment:
This is the text of the removed article which is cached.
When Genocide
is Permissible
Yochanan Gordon
1
August, 2014
Judging
by the numbers of casualties on both sides in this almost one-month
old war one would be led to the conclusion that Israel has resorted
to disproportionate means in fighting a far less- capable enemy. That
is as far as what meets the eye. But, it’s now obvious that the US
and the UN are completely out of touch with the nature of this foe
and are therefore not qualified to dictate or enforce the rules of
this war – because when it comes to terror there is much more than
meets the eye.
I
wasn’t aware of this, but it seems that the nature of warfare has
undergone a major shift over the years. Where wars were usually waged
to defeat the opposing side, today it seems – and judging by the
number of foul calls it would indicate – that today’s wars are
fought to a draw. I mean, whoever heard of a timeout in war? An NBA
Basketball game allows six timeouts for each team during the course
of a game, but last I checked this is a war! We are at war with an
enemy whose charter calls for the annihilation of our people.
Nothing, then, can be considered disproportionate when we are
fighting for our very right to live.
The
sad reality is that Israel gets it, but its hands are being tied by
world leaders who over the past six years have insisted they are such
good friends with the Jewish state, that they know more regarding its
interests than even they do. But there’s going to have to come a
time where Israel feels threatened enough where it has no other
choice but to defy international warnings – because this is life or
death.
Most
of the reports coming from Gazan officials and leaders since the
start of this operation have been either largely exaggerated or
patently false. The truth is, it’s not their fault, falsehood and
deceit is part of the very fabric of who they are and that will never
change. Still however, despite their propensity to lie, when your
enemy tells you that they are bent on your destruction you believe
them. Similarly, when Khaled Meshal declares that no physical damage
to Gaza will dampen their morale or weaken their resolve – they
have to be believed. Our sage Gedalia the son of Achikam was given
intelligence that Yishmael Ben Nesanyah was plotting to kill him.
However, in his piety or rather naiveté Gedalia dismissed the report
as a random act of gossip and paid no attention to it. To this day,
the day following Rosh Hashana is commemorated as a fast day in the
memory of Gedalia who was killed in cold blood on the second day of
Rosh Hashana during the meal.
They say the definition of insanity is
repeating the same mistakes over and over. History is there to teach
us lessons and the lesson here is that when your enemy swears to
destroy you – you take him seriously.
Hamas
has stated forthrightly that it idealizes death as much as Israel
celebrates life. What other way then is there to deal with an enemy
of this nature other than obliterate them completely?
News
anchors such as those from CNN, BBC and Al-Jazeera have not missed an
opportunity to point out the majority of innocent civilians who have
lost their lives as a result of this war. But anyone who lives with
rocket launchers installed or terror tunnels burrowed in or around
the vicinity of their home cannot be considered an innocent civilian.
If you’ll counter, that Hamas has been seen abusing civilians who
have attempted to leave their homes in response to Israeli warnings
to leave – well then, your beginning to come to terms with the
nature of this enemy which should automatically cause the rules of
standard warfare to be suspended.
Everyone
agrees that Israel has the right to defend itself as well as the
right to exercise that right. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon has
declared it, Obama and Kerry have clearly stated that no one could be
expected to sit idle as thousands of rockets rain down on the heads
of its citizens, placing them in clear and present danger. It seems
then that the only point of contention is regarding the measure of
punishment meted out in this situation.
I
will conclude with a question for all the humanitarians out there.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu clearly stated at the outset of
this incursion that his objective is to restore a sustainable quiet
for the citizens of Israel. We have already established that it is
the responsibility of every government to ensure the safety and
security of its people. If political leaders and military experts
determine that the only way to achieve its goal of sustaining quiet
is through genocide is it then permissible to achieve those
responsible goals?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.