Trees:
our life savers are dying
For
centuries we've treated forests poorly. Yet we're only just learning
how crucial trees are to our survival
7
July, 2013
Several
years ago a few trees in my 15 acres of pine forest in Montana turned
from green to a rusty brown, killed by swarms of bark beetles. Four
years later virtually all of my centuries-old forest was dead. It
wasn't just the beetles that did in my trees, but much warmer winters
here in the Rocky mountains that no longer killed the bugs, allowing
them to expand exponentially.
Since
then, as a science journalist for the New York Times, I have written
many stories about the dying of the trees – and the news is not
good. Many forests across the length and breadth of the Rockies have
died in the last decade. Most of the mature forests of British
Columbia are gone, from a combination of climate and insects.
The
bristlecone pines of the US – the most ancient trees in the world,
with some more than 4,000 years old – will die in the coming years
because of a combination of bark beetles and a fungal disease,
enabled by a warmer climate. Tree-ring studies on the bristlecone
show that the last 50 years are the warmest half century in the last
3,700 years.
All
this is to say that the fungus killing ash trees in Britain is
unlikely to be a one-off. Trees across the world are dying. It's not
only the changes brought by a warmer world. We've treated the world's
trees poorly for centuries, without regard to ecological principles.
We've fragmented forests into tiny slivers, and selected out the best
genetics again and again with no regard to the fitness of those that
remain. Air pollution and soil abuse has taken a toll. And scientists
admit trees and forests are poorly studied. "It's embarrassing
how little we know," a leading redwood expert told me.
Yet
the little that is known indicates trees are essential. They are the
planet's heat shield, cooling temperatures beneath them by 10C and
blocking cancer-causing ultraviolet rays. They are robust filters of
our air and water, and soak up climate-warming carbon dioxide.
Forests slow the runoff of rainfall. Many of the world's damaging
floods are really caused by deforestation.
These
functions are well known. But trees play many other critical roles
that we know little about. Katsuhiko Matsunaga, a marine chemist at
Hokkaido University in Japan, discovered that as the leaves from
trees decompose, humic acid leaches into the ocean and helps
fertilise plankton, critical food for many other forms of sea life.
Japanese fisherman began an award-winning campaign called Forests Are
the Lovers of the Sea, and planted trees along the coasts and rivers
that rejuvenated fish and oyster stocks.
Also
in Japan, researchers have long studied what they call "forest
bathing". Hiking through the forest has been shown to reduce
stress chemicals in the body and to increase NK or natural killer
cells in the immune system, that fight tumours and viruses. Elsewhere
researchers have demonstrated that anxiety, depression and even crime
are lower in neighbourhoods with trees in the picture.
Hundreds
of different kinds of chemicals are emitted by trees and forests,
many beneficial. Taxane from the Pacific yew tree is a powerful
anti-cancer drug. Many other tree compounds are proven to be
antibacterial, anti-fungal, anti-viral and even to prevent cancer.
The active ingredient of aspirin, acetylsalicylic acid, for example,
comes from willows. Recommended by doctors to prevent a range of
cancers, as well as heart attack and stroke, some believe this
chemical in the wild has a medicinal impact on the health of all
creatures as it is aerosolised into the air and water, and breathed
in and drunk. Yet, it hasn't been researched.
Trees
are greatly underused as an eco-technology – "working trees"
– to make natural systems, as well as the world's cities and rural
areas, more resilient. They are used here in the US to prevent soil
erosion and shade crops. In a neat bit of alchemy, trees can be used
to clean up the most toxic of wastes, including explosives, solvents
and organic wastes, because of a dense community of microbes as thick
as a finger around the tree's roots, a process known as
phytoremediation.
The
question is what to plant to withstand the challenges of a changing
world to assure a world with trees. In the UK a group called Future
Trees Trust is breeding more resilient trees. And a shade-tree farmer
from the US named David Milarch, a co-founder of the Archangel
Ancient Tree Archive, and whom I have written about, is making copies
of some of the world's oldest and largest trees, from California
redwoods to the oaks of Ireland – with proven survivor genetics –
to be part of a future forest mix. "These are the supertrees,"
he says, "and they have stood the test of time."
Before
I began this journey I felt planting trees was a feeble response to
the planet's problems. No longer. As the proverb asks: "When is
the best time to plant a tree?" Twenty years ago. "The
second-best time?" Today.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.