400 people in Auckland? Is that the sum total of people who care about liberty?
Prominent
NZers scathing of GCSB bill
More
than 400 people turned out in Auckland to hear a line-up of prominent
New Zealanders denounce the Government's spy agency bill.
26
July, 2013
The
Intelligence and Security Committee has reported the Government
Communications Security Bureau Bill back to Parliament with some
changes, but speakers at the meeting were scathing in their
criticism, describing it as a threat to democracy.
Anthropologist
and New Zealander of the Year Dame Anne Salmond spoke against the
bill at Thursday evening's meeting in Mt Albert War Memorial Hall.
Dame
Anne said her father's generation had fought for people's freedoms,
including the right to privacy, but said the Government's bill
defeats that by allowing the it to spy on its own citizens.
She
said the Government should remember it was elected to represent
people, not rule them, and any MP who lacks the backbone to vote
against the bill should in future stay home on Anzac Day.
Internet
businessman Kim Dotcom told the meeting he was a living example of
why the security service should not be given expanded powers.
Barrister
Rodney Harrison QC said the Government's bill was hopelessly broad
and changes negotiated by independent MP Peter Dunne are effectively
a "Dunne deal" that is no more than window dressing, and do
nothing to reduce the risks.
Opposition
not appeased by bill changes
Opposition
parties say their misgivings over the legislation are in no way
allayed by changes made to it. The main changes are an advisory panel
to sit alongside the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security,
and a set of guiding principles.
Labour
says the definition of private communications is too broad. It says
metadata is not seen as a communication, so details such as the time
a phone call was made and its length can be collected without a
warrant.
Labour
leader David Shearer says while Labour recognises that there are
security risks here, those need to be balanced with protecting New
Zealanders' privacy and human rights. He says amendments to the bill
negotiated by Mr Dunne only make a bad bill slightly less bad.
The
Green Party says the bill allows GCSB to share New Zealander's
information with overseas agencies.
Speaking out against the GCSB bill
Campbell
Live,
25
July, 2013
To
see the video GO
HERE
An otherwise passive public sides with Kim Dotcom
Public
sides with Dotcom in poll
It's
Dotcom versus Key - the showdown
Patrick
Gower
26
July, 2013
At
issue is whether the Prime Minister knew about Kim Dotcom before the
raid on his Coatesville mansion in February last year.
John
Key has always denied it, but Mr Dotcom says he has evidence to prove
it.
A
3 News Reid Research poll asked the public who they believe; 52
percent said they believe Dotcom, while 34 percent believe Mr Key.
The rest said they didn't know or care.
"Any
number of surveys taken during the year will show you that the public
are quite sceptical about what politicians actually say, and I
suspect there's a bit of that built into those poll numbers," Mr
Key said.
"Truthfully,
Kim Dotcom's been making these kinds of comments for 18 months and
has never actually managed to produce a shred of evidence. He comes
up with a lot of conspiracies, but nothing that actually proves that
he's right because he's not right."
Dotcom
had motivation to "string this thing out as long as he possibly
can", Mr Key said.
"At
the end of the day, he's facing an extradition trial and he's trying
to politicise that process.
"In
the end, he's trying to make sure he takes as long as he possibly can
before he ends up in the United States."
In
response to the poll, Dotcom said the result "put a smile on my
face".
"The
Prime Minister's subservient relationship with the United States, his
ongoing brain fades, the new spy laws that are incompatible with our
democracy, plus the ongoing political persecution against me, my
family and friends might have contributed to this poll result. The
truth will come out."
Dotcom
will attend an anti-spy law rally in Auckland tonight and he says he
will produce the evidence at his extradition hearing next year.
So
the public has sided with Dotcom, but it won't be decided until he
fronts up with the evidence. He's clearly waiting until election
year. Then everyone can judge who wins.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.