Posts
Facepalm
#3: John Key
Frank
McSkasy
4
July, 2013
On
TV3 News tonight
Acknowledgement:
TV3 – Did Key lie, or is Dotcom bluffing?
One
of the worst interviews from Key. His comments had to be heard to be
believed…
0:45 – “He makes so many claims that are just factually incorrect..”
.
Not
true.
In
fact, to date, every claim that Kim Dotcom made in regards to John
Banks has been proven to be true. Not one statement from Dotcom has
been disproven as a lie.
Either
Key was woefully ignorant of this fact – or once again he has
deceived the public.
0:56 “And to the best of all the records that we’ve checked and we’ve gone extensively through every record my office holds, there is no evidence that we can point to we’ve heard of the guy, prior to the 19th of January 2012.”
.
So why does Key have to go “through every record my office holds ” to answer a simple question whether or not he knew of Kim Dotcom much earlier than he has admitted? Surely he would know this without having to go through his office records?!
Why also is Key referring to “there is no evidence that we can point to we’ve heard of the guy” - when his own memory should be sufficient? Why does he need to check if evidence exists or not?
Evidence of what?
.
2:09: “The man is a conspiracy theorist. He makes things up.”
.
“He
makes things up“?!?!
Key
is accusing other people
of “making things up”?!?!
John
Key is perhaps the most dishonest Prime Minister we have seen. He
bends the truth to suit the situation. He is conveniently forgetful
to such a degree that the term “brain fade” has entered common
usage. His reputation for making it up as he goes along is now common
knowledge.
As
I wrote before; Kim Dotcom has been 100% up-front with the people of
New Zealand and has never been caught out lying or even bending the
truth.
The
same cannot be said of John Key or John Banks.
To hear the John Key comments GO HERE
0:45 – “He makes so many claims that are just factually incorrect..”
0:56 “And to the best of all the records that we’ve checked and we’ve gone extensively through every record my office holds, there is no evidence that we can point to we’ve heard of the guy, prior to the 19th of January 2012.”
So why does Key have to go “through every record my office holds ” to answer a simple question whether or not he knew of Kim Dotcom much earlier than he has admitted? Surely he would know this without having to go through his office records?!
Why also is Key referring to “there is no evidence that we can point to we’ve heard of the guy” - when his own memory should be sufficient? Why does he need to check if evidence exists or not?
Evidence of what?
2:09: “The man is a conspiracy theorist. He makes things up.”
For Kim Dotcom's full speech to the Select Committee GO HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.